Development and psychometric testing of a Chinese version of the postnatal care experience scale for postpartum women

被引:1
|
作者
Sun, Liping [1 ]
Wang, Xiaojiao [1 ]
Gao, Hua [1 ]
Li, Zhaorun [2 ]
Chen, Meiyi [2 ]
Qian, Xu [2 ,3 ]
Gu, Chunyi [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Nursing, Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Maternal Child & Adolescent Hlth, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Global Hlth Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Experience; Measurement; Postnatal care; Psychometrics; Scale; SOCIAL SUPPORT; HEALTH-CARE; SELF-CARE; SATISFACTION; PERCEPTIONS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-023-06187-z
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Postnatal period is a critical transitional phase in the lives of mothers and newborn babies. In recent years the importance on promoting a positive experience of care following childbirth is increasingly emphasized. Yet published evidence of the methodological and psychometric quality of instruments to evaluate women's experience of comprehensive postnatal care is still lacking.Objective This study aimed to develop and validate a unique scale (the Chinese version of the Postnatal Care Experience Scale, PCES) to measure women's overall experience of care during postnatal periods.Methods The PCES instrument was developed and validated over three phases, including item development, scale development, and scale evaluation. The item pool of the PCES was generated through existing literature and in-depth semi-structured interviews, followed by assessment of content validity and rating of importance and feasibility of items through two-round Delphi surveys. Psychometric properties were examined in a convenience sample of 736 postpartum women. Both exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted to assess the construct validity of the developed PCES. The relationship between the total PCES score and the global item construct was estimated using Pearson product-moment coefficient. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and Spearman Brown coefficients.Results The content validity index of the Chinese version PCES was 0.867. Following item reduction analysis, this instrument consisted of 30 five-point Likert items. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin statistic was 0.964 and the chi-square value of the Bartlett spherical test was 11665.399 (P < .001). The scale explained 75.797% of the total variance and consisted of three subscales, including self-management, social support, and facility- and community-based care. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the total PCES score and the global item construct was 0.909. The CFA showed that the 3-factor model had suitable fitness for the data. Cronbach's alpha value and Spearman-Brown Split-half reliability for the total scale were 0.979 and 0.941, respectively.Conclusions The newly developed 30-item PCES is a psychometrically reliable and valid instrument that assesses women's overall experience of postnatal care. Future research should aim to use the PCES in various populations to obtain further evidence for its validity and reliability.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and psychometric testing of a Chinese version of the postnatal care experience scale for postpartum women
    Liping Sun
    Xiaojiao Wang
    Hua Gao
    Zhaorun Li
    Meiyi Chen
    Xu Qian
    Chunyi Gu
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23
  • [2] The Care Dependency Scale: psychometric testing of the Chinese version
    Shu-Qi Zhang
    Hong-Mei Wang
    Xiao-Yuan Yang
    Wen-Qin Ye
    [J]. Frontiers of Nursing, 2016, 3 (02) : 62 - 65
  • [3] Scale for Measuring Role Strain in Women With Diabetes Development and Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version
    Huang, Chiu-Ling
    Chen, Shi-Yu
    Hsu, Hui-Chun
    Wang, Ruey-Hsia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2020, 35 (05) : 483 - 490
  • [4] Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Perceived Maternal Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale among postpartum women
    Zhong, Xiaoying
    Barnes, Christopher R.
    Adamson-Macedo, Elvidina N.
    Li, Xixi
    Guo, Xiujing
    He, Tingting
    Li, Dehua
    Li, Zuowei
    Wang, Bangjun
    Wu, Hongjin
    [J]. CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 50 (03)
  • [5] Diabetes Empowerment Process Scale: development and psychometric testing of the Chinese version
    Chen, Mei-Fang
    Wang, Ruey-Hsia
    Cheng, Chung-Ping
    Chin, Chi-Chun
    Stocker, Joel
    Tang, Shan-Mei
    Chen, Shu-Wen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2011, 67 (01) : 204 - 214
  • [6] Development and psychometric testing of the Chinese Postnatal Risk Factors Questionnaire (CPRFQ) for postpartum depression
    Yan, Xiaoyu
    Lu, Jun
    Shi, Shenxun
    Wang, Ximei
    Zhao, Rui
    Yan, Yuan
    Chen, Gang
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2015, 18 (02) : 229 - 237
  • [7] Development and psychometric testing of the Chinese Postnatal Risk Factors Questionnaire (CPRFQ) for postpartum depression
    Xiaoyu Yan
    Jun Lu
    Shenxun Shi
    Ximei Wang
    Rui Zhao
    Yuan Yan
    Gang Chen
    [J]. Archives of Women's Mental Health, 2015, 18 : 229 - 237
  • [8] Professional Practice Environment Scale-Chinese Version: Development and Psychometric Testing
    Teng, Ching-I
    Chang, Hao-Yuan
    Lu, Jui-fen Rachel
    Chou, Chia-Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2016, 24 (01) : 21 - 30
  • [9] Development and psychometric testing of a Chinese version of the Fatigue Scale-Children in Taiwan
    Chiang, Yi-Chien
    Hinds, Pamela S.
    Yeh, Chao-Hsing
    Yang, Chao-Ping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2008, 17 (09) : 1201 - 1210
  • [10] Development and psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the Resilience Scale for Southeast Asian immigrant women who divorced in Taiwan
    Kuo, Shu-Fen
    Hou, Wen-Hsuan
    Chang, Chia-Chi
    Liao, Yuan-Mei
    Cheng, Sue-Yueh
    Chou, Yu-Hua
    Yeh, Yueh-Chen
    Lin, Yen-Kuang
    Chen, I-Hui
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (02):