Understanding social network support, composition, and structure among cancer caregivers

被引:6
|
作者
Bouchard, Elizabeth G. [1 ,9 ]
Prince, Mark A. [2 ]
McCarty, Christopher [3 ]
Vincent, Paula C. [1 ]
Patel, Hital [1 ]
LaValley, Susan A. [1 ]
Collins, R. Lorraine [4 ]
Sahler, Olle Jane Z. [5 ]
Krenz, Till [6 ]
Kelly, Kara M. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Roswell Park Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Canc Prevent & Control, Buffalo, NY USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Psychol, Ft Collins, CO USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Anthropol, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Buffalo, Dept Community Hlth & Hlth Behav, Buffalo, NY USA
[5] Univ Rochester, Dept Pediat, Rochester, NY USA
[6] UHealth Informat Technol, Sylvester Comprehens Canc Ctr, Miami, FL USA
[7] Roswell Park Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Pediat Oncol, Buffalo, NY USA
[8] Univ Buffalo, Dept Pediat, Buffalo, NY USA
[9] Roswell Park Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Canc Prevent & Control, Elm & Carlton St, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
关键词
cancer; caregiving; oncology; social network; social support; PEDIATRIC CANCER; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS; PARENTS; MOTHERS; HEALTH; CHILDREN; TIES; ACTIVATION; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1002/pon.6087
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveWe examined the social network support, composition, and structure of pediatric cancer caregivers. MethodsWe used a self-report survey to collect egocentric social network data from 107 caregivers of pediatric cancer patients and calculated descriptive statistics to examine cancer-related support network composition, function, and structure. We then ran logistic regressions to examine the relationships between network characteristics and overall satisfaction with social support. ResultsFamily members were the most common source of emotional support and logistical support, and health care providers were the most common source of informational support. Participants perceived the "most helpful" forms of support as being: (1) emotional support from family and health care providers; (2) informational support from health care providers and other cancer caregivers; and (3) logistical support from family. Overall, caregivers wished that 9.8% of their network ties had provided more support, with family members being the most common alter type to disappoint caregivers and offer less support than needed/expected. Caregivers who reported higher network disappointment (having network members who offered less support than needed/expected) were significantly less satisfied with emotional support than those with lower network disappointment (Odds Ratio = 0.18, p = 0.02), and caregivers with higher network disappointment were significantly less satisfied with logistical support compared to those with lower network disappointment (Odds Ratio = 0.14, p = 0.01). ConclusionOur results show differences in the nature of social support provided by different types of network members. These findings have implications for tailoring social network interventions to improve caregiver and family outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 417
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条