Supported decision-making interventions in mental healthcare: A systematic review of current evidence and implementation barriers

被引:1
|
作者
Francis, Cathy J. [1 ,4 ]
Johnson, Amanda [2 ]
Wilson, Rhonda L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Nursing & Midwifery, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[3] Massey Univ, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[4] Care Of Wilson R, Univ Newcastle, Cent Coast Clin Sch, 77a Holden St, Gosford, NSW 2250, Australia
关键词
mental health; person-centred care; shared decision-making; supported decision-making; UNCRPD; PSYCHIATRIC ADVANCE DIRECTIVES; JOINT CRISIS PLANS; BORDERLINE PERSONALITY-DISORDER; SERVICE USER; PERSPECTIVES; EXPERIENCES; STATEMENTS; INDIVIDUALS; INVOLVEMENT; PSYCHOSIS;
D O I
10.1111/hex.14001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThere is a growing momentum around the world to foster greater opportunities for the involvement of mental health service users in their care and treatment planning. In-principle support for this aim is widespread across mental healthcare professionals. Yet, progress in mental health services towards this objective has lagged in practice.ObjectivesWe conducted a systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method research on interventions to improve opportunities for the involvement of mental healthcare service users in treatment planning, to understand the current research evidence and the barriers to implementation.MethodsSeven databases were searched and 5137 articles were screened. Articles were included if they reported on an intervention for adult service users, were published between 2008 and October 2023 and were in English. Evidence in the 140 included articles was synthesised according to the JBI guidance on Mixed Methods Systematic Reviews.ResultsResearch in this field remains exploratory in nature, with a wide range of interventions investigated to date but little experimental replication. Overarching barriers to shared and supported decision-making in mental health treatment planning were (1) Organisational (resource limitations, culture barriers, risk management priorities and structure); (2) Process (lack of knowledge, time constraints, health-related concerns, problems completing and using plans); and (3) Relationship barriers (fear and distrust for both service users and clinicians).ConclusionsOn the basis of the barriers identified, recommendations are made to enable the implementation of new policies and programs, the designing of new tools and for clinicians seeking to practice shared and supported decision-making in the healthcare they offer.Patient or Public ContributionThis systematic review has been guided at all stages by a researcher with experience of mental health service use, who does not wish to be identified at this point in time. The findings may inform organisations, researchers and practitioners on implementing supported decision-making, for the greater involvement of people with mental ill health in their healthcare.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital Shared Decision-Making Interventions in Mental Healthcare: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Vitger, Tobias
    Korsbek, Lisa
    Austin, Stephen F.
    Petersen, Lone
    Nordentoft, Merete
    Hjorthoj, Carsten
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 12
  • [2] Supported decision-making in mental health treatment planning: A systematic, integrative review
    Francis, Cathy
    Wilson, Rhonda
    Johnson, Amanda
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2023, 32 : 16 - 16
  • [3] Supported Decision-Making for Persons with Mental Illness: A Review
    Pathare, Soumitra
    Shields, Laura S.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS, 2012, 34 (02)
  • [4] Neuropsychological Interventions for Decision-Making in Addiction: a Systematic Review
    Verdejo-Garcia, Antonio
    Alcazar-Corcoles, Miguel A.
    Albein-Urios, Natalia
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2019, 29 (01) : 79 - 92
  • [5] Neuropsychological Interventions for Decision-Making in Addiction: a Systematic Review
    Antonio Verdejo-García
    Miguel A. Alcázar-Córcoles
    Natalia Albein-Urios
    [J]. Neuropsychology Review, 2019, 29 : 79 - 92
  • [6] DECISION-MAKING AMONG CALD ADULTS WITH CHRONIC DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF BARRIERS, FACILITATORS, AND INTERVENTIONS
    Muscat, D.
    Kanagaratnam, R.
    Shepherd, H.
    Sud, K.
    Mccaffery, K.
    Webster, A.
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 22 : 47 - 47
  • [7] A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to and interventions for proxy decision-making by family carers of people with dementia
    Lord, Kathryn
    Livingston, Gill
    Cooper, Claudia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2015, 27 (08) : 1301 - 1312
  • [8] Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review
    Laura Boland
    Ian D. Graham
    France Légaré
    Krystina Lewis
    Janet Jull
    Allyson Shephard
    Margaret L. Lawson
    Alexandra Davis
    Audrey Yameogo
    Dawn Stacey
    [J]. Implementation Science, 14
  • [9] Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review
    Boland, Laura
    Graham, Ian D.
    Legare, France
    Lewis, Krystina
    Jull, Janet
    Shephard, Allyson
    Lawson, Margaret L.
    Davis, Alexandra
    Yameogo, Audrey
    Stacey, Dawn
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [10] Healthcare professionals' behaviour regarding the implementation of shared decision-making in screening programmes: A systematic review
    Hernandez-Leal, Maria Jose
    Perez-Lacasta, Maria Jose
    Feijoo-Cid, Maria
    Ramos-Garcia, Vanesa
    Carles-Lavila, Misericordia
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (08) : 1933 - 1944