Artificial intelligence and co-authorship of scientific manuscripts: discussions about using ChatGPT in scientific research and writing

被引:1
|
作者
de Vasconcellos, Vinicius Gomes [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Goias, Goiania, Go, Brazil
[2] Inst Brasileiro Ensino Desenvolvimento & Pesquisa, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[3] Univ Catolica Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
editorial; co-authorship; artificial intelligence; ChatGPT; chatbots; scientific integrity; editing;
D O I
10.22197/rbdpp.v9i3.913
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This paper intends to analyze the use of artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, in scientific research and writing and its conflicts with integrity standards in co-authorship. Thus, we aim to problematize the theme and suggest criteria for defining co-authorship in scientific works in the perspective of using artificial intelligence tools. It is concluded that, considering the current scenario, scientific journals should introduce policies on the issue, recommending that: 1. artificial intelligence mechanisms (such as ChatGPT) do not satisfy the requirements for co-authorship; 2. Authors must declare (in the methodology or in the acknowledgments) the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms in the writing of the article and/or in the other stages of the scientific research; 3. Authors are responsible for errors, plagiarism and other misconducts that eventually occur in their research due to the use of artificial intelligence mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:1047 / 1057
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条