Eating smart: Free-ranging dogs follow an optimal foraging strategy while scavenging in groups

被引:4
|
作者
Sarkar, Rohan [1 ]
Bhowmick, Anirban [1 ,2 ]
Dasgupta, Debsruti [1 ,3 ]
Banerjee, Rounak [1 ,3 ]
Chakraborty, Poushali [1 ,4 ]
Nayek, Abhijit [1 ,5 ]
Sreelekshmi, R. [1 ,6 ]
Roy, Aritra [1 ,7 ]
Sonowal, Rituparna [1 ]
Mondal, Amartya Baran [1 ,8 ]
Bhadra, Anindita [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci Educ & Res Kolkata, Dept Biol Sci, Behav & Ecol Lab, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
[2] Indian Inst Sci Educ & Res Berhampur, Dept Biol Sci, Berhampur, Orissa, India
[3] St Xaviers Coll Autonomous, Dept Biotechnol, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
[4] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Life Sci & Biotechnol, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
[5] Univ Delhi, Acharya Narendra Dev Coll, Dept Biomed Sci, New Delhi, Delhi, India
[6] Hyderabad Cent Univ, Ctr Syst & Computat Biol, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
[7] TERI Sch Adv Studies, Dept Energy & Environm, New Delhi, Delhi, India
[8] Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda Centenary Coll, Dept Zool, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
来源
关键词
scavengers; group foraging; optimal foraging theory; food selection; competition; GROUP-SIZE; CROSS-VALIDATION; FOOD PREFERENCE; VIGILANCE; BEHAVIOR; GREAT; DEER; DIET;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2023.1099543
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Foraging and acquiring of food is a delicate balance between managing the costs (both energy and social) and individual preferences. Previous research on solitarily foraging free-ranging dogs showed that they prioritise the nutritionally highest valued food, but do not ignore other less valuable food either, displaying typical scavenger behaviour. We conducted a similar experiment on 136 groups of dogs with the same set-up to see the change in foraging strategies, if any, under the influence of social cost like intra-group competition. We found multiple differences between the strategies of dogs foraging alone versus in groups with competition playing an implicit role in the dogs' decision making when foraging in groups. Dogs continually assessed and evaluated the available resources in a "patch," transitioning from random foraging to systematic foraging with time and more information. Dogs in groups used an, "eat first, sample afterwards" strategy whereas individual dogs sampled thoroughly before eating. Additionally, dogs in groups were quicker and more likely to respond to the experimental set-up and eat from it. The dogs adjusted their behaviour in terms of effort and time allocated according to the quality of the "patch." Foraging in groups also provided benefits of reduced individual vigilance. The various decisions and choices made lend support to the optimal foraging theory wherein the dogs harvested the nutritionally richest patch possible with the least risk and cost involved but were willing to compromise if that was not possible. This underscores the cognitive, quick decision-making abilities and adaptable behaviour of these dogs, which is likely to have influenced the process of dog domestication.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] To be or not to be social: foraging associations of free-ranging dogs in an urban ecosystem
    Majumder, Sreejani Sen
    Bhadra, Anandarup
    Ghosh, Arjun
    Mitra, Soumitra
    Bhattacharjee, Debottam
    Chatterjee, Jit
    Nandi, Anjan K.
    Bhadra, Anindita
    ACTA ETHOLOGICA, 2014, 17 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [2] To be or not to be social: foraging associations of free-ranging dogs in an urban ecosystem
    Sreejani Sen Majumder
    Anandarup Bhadra
    Arjun Ghosh
    Soumitra Mitra
    Debottam Bhattacharjee
    Jit Chatterjee
    Anjan K. Nandi
    Anindita Bhadra
    acta ethologica, 2014, 17 : 1 - 8
  • [3] Free-ranging dogs match a human's preference in a foraging task
    Cimarelli, Giulia
    Juskaite, Magdelena
    Range, Friederike
    Marshall-Pescini, Sarah
    Mazza, Valeria
    CURRENT ZOOLOGY, 2024, 70 (03) : 343 - 349
  • [4] 'Bolder' together - response to human social cues in groups of free-ranging dogs
    Bhattacharjee, Debottam
    Sau, Shubhra
    Bhadra, Anindita
    BEHAVIOUR, 2020, 157 (3-4) : 363 - 384
  • [5] Pattern of individual participation and cheating in conflicts between groups of free-ranging dogs
    Bonanni, Roberto
    Valsecchi, Paola
    Natoli, Eugenia
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2010, 79 (04) : 957 - 968
  • [6] Differential foraging strategies: motivation, perception and implementation in urban free-ranging dogs, Canis familiaris
    Mangalam, Madhur
    Singh, Mewa
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 85 (04) : 763 - 770
  • [7] EATING WELL ON THE ROAD: SPATIAL STRUCTURE AND FORAGING IN FREE-RANGING CHACMA BABOONS (PAPIO HAMADRYAS URSINUS)
    Dostie, M. J.
    Lusseau, D.
    Bonnell, T.
    Kienzle, S.
    Barrett, L.
    Henzi, P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2015, 77 : 134 - 134
  • [8] Free-ranging dogs show age related plasticity in their ability to follow human pointing
    Bhattacharjee, Debottam
    Dev, Nikhil N.
    Gupta, Shreya
    Sau, Shubhra
    Sarkar, Rohan
    Biswas, Arpita
    Banerjee, Arunita
    Babu, Daisy
    Mehta, Diksha
    Bhadra, Anindita
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07):
  • [9] THE SOCIAL-ORGANIZATION OF FREE-RANGING URBAN DOGS .2. ESTROUS GROUPS AND THE MATING SYSTEM
    DANIELS, TJ
    APPLIED ANIMAL ETHOLOGY, 1983, 10 (04): : 365 - 373
  • [10] Nitrogen Depletion and Redistribution by Free-Ranging Cattle in the Restoration Process of Mosaic Landscapes: The Role of Foraging Strategy and Habitat Proportion
    Van Uytvanck, Jan
    Milotic, Tanja
    Hoffmann, Maurice
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2010, 18 : 205 - 216