Exergetic analysis and optimization of process variables in xylitol production: Maximizing efficiency and sustainability in biotechnological processes

被引:0
|
作者
Silva, Suzimara Reis [1 ]
da Costa Jr, Esly Ferreira [1 ]
Sarrouh, Boutros [2 ]
da Costa, Andrea Oliveira Souza [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Engn Quim, BR-31270901 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Joao Del Rei, Dept Quim Biotecnol & Engn Bioproc, BR-36420000 Ouro Branco, MG, Brazil
关键词
Exergetic analysis; Xylitol production; Biotech processes sustainability; Multi-objective optimization; LACTIC-ACID; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLYCEROL; ESTERIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; BIOREACTOR; PARAMETERS; GLUCOSE; REACTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129910
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
This study presents an exergetic analysis of xylitol fermentative production from hemicellulose hydrolysate, aiming to optimize operational conditions in a fluidized bed bioreactor. The aerobic fermentation conditions evaluated in this study (gas flow rate -x1, hydrolysate concentration factor -x2, and recirculation flow rate -x3) were optimized using various exergetic parameters and xylitol yield as objective functions. Four objective functions were defined for the mono-objective optimization process: rational exergetic efficiency, normalized destroyed exergy, thermodynamic sustainability index, and xylitol yield factor. The results reveal that the optimization problem involves conflicting objectives when considering both yield-based and exergy-based approaches. Thus, the bioreactor's performance was formulated as a multi-objective problem, where the yield factor and thermodynamic sustainability index were simultaneously maximized. For the multi-objective optimization, the ideal operational variable ranges were found to be: 594 <= x1 <= 619 mL/min, x2 = 7 e 37 <= x3 <= 57 L/h.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Maximizing the Efficiency of Vanillin Production by Biocatalyst Enhancement and Process Optimization
    Luziatelli, Francesca
    Brunetti, Lorenza
    Ficca, Anna Grazia
    Ruzzi, Maurizio
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 7
  • [2] Sustainability assessment of microalgal biodiesel production processes: an exergetic analysis approach with Aspen Plus
    Ofari-Boateng, Cynthia
    Lee, Keat Teong
    Lim, JitKang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2012, 10 (04) : 400 - 416
  • [3] Exergetic analysis of combustion processes including chemical variables
    Bouras, Fethi
    Khaldi, Fouad
    Agoudji, Boudjemaa
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 51 : 2096 - 2104
  • [5] Biotechnological production of xylitol by mutant Candida tropicalis OMV5:: Process optimization using statistical approach
    Rao, Ravella Sreenivas
    Jyothi, Cherukuri Pavana
    Rao, Linga Venkateswar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2008, 7 (02): : 218 - 224
  • [6] Maximizing the Efficiency of Multienzyme Process by Stoichiometry Optimization
    Dvorak, Pavel
    Kurumbang, Nagendra P.
    Bendl, Jaroslav
    Brezovsky, Jan
    Prokop, Zbynek
    Damborsky, Jiri
    CHEMBIOCHEM, 2014, 15 (13) : 1891 - 1895
  • [7] Eco-Efficiency Analysis of biotechnological processes
    Peter Saling
    Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2005, 68 : 1 - 8
  • [8] Ethanol production from biomass: Analysis of process efficiency and sustainability
    Bastianoni, S
    Marchettini, N
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1996, 11 (05): : 411 - 418
  • [9] From by- to bioproducts: selection of a nanofiltration membrane for biotechnological xylitol purification and process optimization
    Cerceau Alves, Yara Pereira
    Fernandes Antunes, Felipe Antonio
    da Silva, Silvio Silverio
    Soares Forte, Marcus Bruno
    FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING, 2021, 125 : 79 - 90
  • [10] Biotechnological Production of Xylitol: Evaluation of Detoxification Process with Residual Lignin Using Response Surface Methodology
    Lima, Flavia C. S.
    Silva, Flavio L. H.
    Gomes, Josivanda P.
    Muniz, Marcelo B.
    Santiago, Angela M.
    Silva, Clovis G.
    IBIC2014: 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 38 : 415 - 420