Infiltrative Growth Predicts the Risk of Recurrence After Surgery in Well-Differentiated Non-Functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

被引:5
|
作者
Lena, Marco Schiavo [1 ]
Partelli, Stefano [2 ]
Andreasi, Valentina [2 ]
Muffatti, Francesca [2 ]
Redegalli, Miriam [1 ]
Brunetto, Emanuela [1 ]
Maghini, Beatrice [1 ]
Falke, Monika [3 ]
Cangi, Maria Giulia [1 ]
Perren, Aurel [3 ]
Falconi, Massimo [2 ]
Doglioni, Claudio [1 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Pancreas Translat & Clin Res Ctr, ENETS Ctr Excellence, Pathol Unit, Via Olgettina 60, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS Osped San Raffaele, Pancreas Translat & Clin Res Ctr, ENETS Ctr Excellence, Pancreat Surg Unit, Via Olgettina 60, I-20132 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Bern, Inselspital, Inst Pathol, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; Infiltrative tumor growth; Vascular invasion; ENDOCRINE NEOPLASMS; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; GUIDELINES; CRITERIA; SYSTEM; CLASSIFICATION; PATTERN; AJCC;
D O I
10.1007/s12022-022-09745-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The incidence of well-differentiated non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNET) increased during the last decades. The risk of relapse after curative surgery, albeit low, is not negligible; moreover, adjuvant treatment is currently not an option and a reliable predictive model based on prognostic characteristics is urgently needed for tailoring a follow-up strategy. The histological classification of PanNET now relies only on the proliferative activity (mitosis and Ki67) and staging. In contrast to other endocrine neoplasms, the role of infiltrative growth pattern in NF-PanNET is not taken into consideration at present. In the current study, 247 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for a NF-PanNET were examined for the histological growth pattern of the tumor. Two distinct patterns (non-infiltrative vs. infiltrative) were described with the latter being further subclassified according to the type of structures invaded by the tumor (non-infiltrative: pattern 1; infiltration of adjacent pancreatic parenchyma and/or peripancreatic soft tissue: pattern 2; invasion of nearby organs and/or major vessels: pattern 3). The infiltrative growth resulted to be strongly associated with a poorer survival compared to a non-infiltrative growth (p < 0.001). In particular, the distinction between pancreatic parenchyma and/or peripancreatic soft tissue invasion versus adjacent organs and/or major vessels invasion was the most powerful predictor of recurrence after surgery at multivariate analysis (pattern 2 vs. pattern 1: HR 10.136, p = 0.028; pattern 3 vs. pattern 1: HR 15.775, p = 0.015). The infiltrative growth pattern could therefore provide additional prognostic information implementing the current grading and staging system.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 155
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Infiltrative Growth Predicts the Risk of Recurrence After Surgery in Well-Differentiated Non-Functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Marco Schiavo Lena
    Stefano Partelli
    Valentina Andreasi
    Francesca Muffatti
    Miriam Redegalli
    Emanuela Brunetto
    Beatrice Maghini
    Monika Falke
    Maria Giulia Cangi
    Aurel Perren
    Massimo Falconi
    Claudio Doglioni
    Endocrine Pathology, 2023, 34 : 142 - 155
  • [2] Analysis of recurrence after resection of well-differentiated non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Tan, Qing-quan
    Wang, Xing
    Yang, Le
    Chen, Yong-Hua
    Tan, Chun-lu
    Zhu, Xiao-mei
    Ke, Neng-wen
    Liu, Xu-Bao
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (24) : E20324
  • [3] Clinicopathological Characteristics and Risk Factors for Recurrence of Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors After Radical Surgery
    Zhang, Pan
    Li, Yuan-liang
    Qiu, Xu-dong
    Tan, Huang-ying
    PANCREAS, 2019, 48 (03) : 457 - 457
  • [4] Comparative analysis of international guidelines on the management of advanced non-functioning well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Panzuto, Francesco
    Lamarca, Angela
    Fazio, Nicola
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2024, 129
  • [5] Recurrence After Curative Resection for Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Kimura, H.
    Ohtsuka, T.
    Date, K.
    Fujimoto, T.
    Matsunaga, T.
    Watanabe, Y.
    Tamura, K.
    Miyasaka, Y.
    Yamada, D.
    Takahata, S.
    Igarashi, H.
    Ito, T.
    Oda, Y.
    Tanaka, M.
    PANCREAS, 2014, 43 (08) : 1379 - 1379
  • [6] Pattern of disease recurrence and treatment after surgery for nonfunctioning well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Partelli, Stefano
    Landoni, Luca
    Andreasi, Valentina
    Nessi, Chiara
    Muffatti, Francesca
    Crippa, Stefano
    Cingarlini, Sara
    Bassi, Claudio
    Falconi, Massimo
    SURGERY, 2020, 168 (05) : 816 - 824
  • [7] Clinical and Molecular Risk Factors for Recurrence Following Radical Surgery of Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Pulvirenti, Alessandra
    Pea, Antonio
    Chang, David K.
    Jamieson, Nigel B.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 7
  • [8] Values of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in well-differentiated non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a comparative study
    Huang, Xi-Tai
    Xie, Jin-Zhao
    Cai, Jian-Peng
    Fang, Peng
    Huang, Chen-Song
    Chen, Wei
    Liang, Li-Jian
    Yin, Xiao-Yu
    GASTROENTEROLOGY REPORT, 2022, 10
  • [9] Nodal recurrence after curative surgery for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A retrospective cohort study
    Peralta Ferreira, M.
    Andreasi, V
    Muffatti, F.
    Crippa, S.
    Tamburrino, D.
    Partelli, S.
    Falconi, M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 34 : 100 - 100
  • [10] ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Digestive Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Digestive System: Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Non-Functioning Tumors
    Falconi, Massimo
    Bartsch, Detlef Klaus
    Eriksson, Barbro
    Kloeppel, Guenter
    Lopes, Jose M.
    O'Connor, Juan M.
    Salazar, Ramon
    Taal, Babs G.
    Vullierme, Marie Pierre
    O'Toole, Dermot
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012, 95 (02) : 120 - 134