Efficacy of Low-dose Ketamine for Control of Acute Pain in the Emergency Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:3
|
作者
Ying, Mengyao [1 ]
Zuo, Yuetun [1 ]
机构
[1] Changxing Peoples Hosp China, Dept Emergency Med, Huzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
MU-OPIOID RECEPTOR; DOUBLE-BLIND; MORPHINE; MANAGEMENT; RELIEF;
D O I
10.5811/westjem.2023.2.58368
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Ketamine can be particularly helpful in situations where the clinician is not able to administer opioids and require an alternate analgesic, such as for patients who are already on high-dose opioids, have a history of addiction, or for opioid-naive children and adults. In this review, our goal was to obtain a comprehensive estimate of the efficacy and safety of low-dose ketamine (dose less than 0.5 milligrams per kilogram or equivalent) compared to opiates for the control of acute pain in the emergency setting. Methods: We conducted systematic searches in PubMed Central, EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar from inception until November 2021. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to assess the quality of included studies. Results: We carried out a meta-analysis with a random-effects model and reported pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals depending on the type of the outcome. We analyzed a total of 15 studies with 1,613 participants. Half of them had high risk of bias and were conducted in the United States of America. The pooled SMD for pain score was -0.12 (95% CI -0.50-0.25; I2=68.8%) within 15 minutes, -0.45 (95% CI -0.84- -0.07; I2=83.3%) within 30 minutes, -0.05 (95% CI -0.41-0.31; I2=86.9%) within 45 minutes, -0.07 (95% CI -0.41-0.26; I2=82%) within 60 minutes, and after 60 minutes the pooled SMD was 0.17 (95% CI -0.07-0.42; I2=64.8%). The pooled RR for need of rescue analgesics was 1.35 (95% CI 0.73-2.50; I2=82.2%). The pooled RRs were as follows: 1.18 (95% CI 0.76-1.84; I2=28.3%) for gastrointestinal side effects; 1.41 (95% CI 0.96-2.06; I2=29.7%) for neurological side effects; 2.83 (95% CI 0.98-8.18; I2=47%) for psychological side effects; and 0.58 (95% CI 0.23-1.48; I2=36.1%) for cardiopulmonary side effects. Conclusion: Low-dose ketamine might have higher or equivalent efficacy and safety when compared to opioids for managing acute pain among patients presenting to the emergency setting. However, further studies are required to establish conclusive evidence, owing to the heterogeneity and poor quality of existing studies.
引用
收藏
页码:644 / 653
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Effects of Low-Dose Ketamine on Acute Pain in an Emergency Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lee, Eun Nam
    Lee, Jae Hoon
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (10):
  • [2] Low-dose Ketamine For Acute Pain Control in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Balzer, Nathan
    McLeod, Shelley L.
    Walsh, Chris
    Grewal, Keerat
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 28 (04) : 444 - 454
  • [3] "Low-dose ketamine versus morphine in the treatment of acute pain in the emergency department: A meta-analysis of 15" randomized controlled trials
    Guo, Juan
    Zhao, Fei
    Bian, Jinglan
    Hu, Yunlong
    Tan, Jixiang
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 76 : 140 - 149
  • [4] Perioperative Low-Dose Ketamine for Postoperative Pain Management in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhou, Lijin
    Yang, Honghao
    Hai, Yong
    Cheng, Yunzhong
    [J]. PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 2022
  • [5] Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Ketamine for Acute Pain Management in the Emergency Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Seak, Yee Sin
    Nor, Junainah
    Tuan Kamauzaman, Tuan Hairulnizam
    Arithra, Ariff
    Islam, Md Asiful
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (17)
  • [6] Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine in the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Pereira, Jose Eduardo Guimaraes
    Pereira, Lucas Ferreira Gomes
    Linhares, Rafael Mercante
    Bersot, Carlos Darcy Alves
    Aslanidis, Theodoros
    Ashmawi, Hazem Adel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 15 : 1011 - 1037
  • [7] Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Orhurhu, Vwaire
    Orhurhu, Mariam Salisu
    Bhatia, Anuj
    Cohen, Steven P.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 129 (01): : 241 - 254
  • [8] Systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events of low-dose aspirin and clopidogrel in randomized controlled trials
    McQuaid, Kenneth R.
    Laine, Loren
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 119 (08): : 624 - 638
  • [9] The effects of low-dose aspirin on preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Saeed Baradwan
    Afaf Tawfiq
    Ghaidaa Farouk Hakeem
    Alya Alkaff
    Bandr Hafedh
    Yaser Faden
    Khalid Khadawardi
    Sahar H. Abdulghani
    Hanin Althagafi
    Ahmed Abu-Zaid
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2024, 309 : 1775 - 1786
  • [10] The effects of low-dose aspirin on preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Baradwan, Saeed
    Tawfiq, Afaf
    Hakeem, Ghaidaa Farouk
    Alkaff, Alya
    Hafedh, Bandr
    Faden, Yaser
    Khadawardi, Khalid
    Abdulghani, Sahar H.
    Althagafi, Hanin
    Abu-Zaid, Ahmed
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2024, 309 (05) : 1775 - 1786