Circular life cycle sustainability assessment: An integrated framework

被引:21
|
作者
Luthin, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Traverso, Marzia [1 ]
Crawford, Robert H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Sustainabil Civil Engn, Mies van der Rohe Str 1, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Melbourne, Fac Architecture Bldg & Planning, Parkville, Australia
关键词
circular economy; circularity assessment; framework; industrial ecology; life cycle sustainability assessment; sustainability; RESOURCE EFFICIENCY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; ECONOMY INDICATORS; CLOSED-LOOP; DESIGN; MANAGEMENT; PRODUCTS; TOOL; LEVEL; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.13446
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Robust monitoring and assessment methods are required to assess circular economy (CE) concepts in terms of their degree of circularity and their contribution to sustainability. This research aimed to develop an integrated framework for the CE context-considering both the technical circularity and the complexity of the three dimensions of sustainability (environment, economy, and social). Two existing methods were identified as an appropriate foundation: CE indicators and life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA), combining life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC), and social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). The developed circular life cycle sustainability assessment (C-LCSA) framework added circularity assessment (CA) as an additional dimension to LCSA (C-LCSA = LCA + LCC + S-LCA + CA). The abundance of CE indicators required a systematic selection process to identify the most appropriate indicators for the framework which was built on criteria levels, performance, loops, unit, dimension, and transversality. The material circularity indicator, product circularity indicator, and longevity indicator were identified as most suited for C-LCSA. Being developed for a single life cycle, the traditional life cycle approaches needed refinements for application to CE concepts, derived from discussions and proposed adaptions presented in the academic literature. The cut-off approach was identified as the most suitable end-of-life allocation method for C-LCSA, being in line with the technical system boundaries. C-LCSA can be used by LCA practitioners to identify trade-offs between an improved circularity and resulting impacts on the environmental, economic, and social pillars to provide a basis for decision making in industrial ecology.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 58
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Advancing Integrated Systems Modelling Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment
    Halog, Anthony
    Manik, Yosef
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2011, 3 (02) : 469 - 499
  • [2] A framework for implementing holistic and integrated life cycle sustainability assessment of regional bioeconomy
    Zeug, Walther
    Bezama, Alberto
    Thran, Daniela
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (10): : 1998 - 2023
  • [3] A framework for implementing holistic and integrated life cycle sustainability assessment of regional bioeconomy
    Walther Zeug
    Alberto Bezama
    Daniela Thrän
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 1998 - 2023
  • [4] Assessing the circularity and sustainability of circular carpets - a demonstration of circular life cycle sustainability assessment
    Luthin, Anna
    Crawford, Robert H.
    Traverso, Marzia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (10): : 1945 - 1964
  • [5] A new quantitative life cycle sustainability assessment framework: Application to integrated energy systems
    Moslehi, Salim
    Reddy, T. Agami
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 239 : 482 - 493
  • [6] Integrated Sustainability Assessment: Exergy, Emergy, Life Cycle Assessment
    Cano-Londono, Natalia
    Heriberto, Cabezas
    Krisztian, Baracza
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 3
  • [7] Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Additive Manufacturing
    Ribeiro, Ines
    Matos, Florinda
    Jacinto, Celeste
    Salman, Hafiz
    Cardeal, Goncalo
    Carvalho, Helena
    Godina, Radu
    Pecas, Paulo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [8] An integrated life cycle inventory for demolition processes in the context of life cycle sustainability assessment
    Bozhilova-Kisheva, Kossara P.
    Hu, Mingming
    van Roekel, Eric
    Olsen, Stig I.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION: CIVIL ENGINEERING AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 86 : 327 - 335
  • [9] An integrated life cycle sustainability assessment of electricity generation in Turkey
    Atilgan, Burcin
    Azapagic, Adisa
    ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 93 : 168 - 186
  • [10] Framework for integrating animal welfare into life cycle sustainability assessment
    Laura Scherer
    Brian Tomasik
    Oscar Rueda
    Stephan Pfister
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 1476 - 1490