Outcomes of Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Cancer on Initial Versus Confirmatory Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance

被引:2
|
作者
Perera, Marlon [1 ]
Jibara, Ghalib [1 ]
Tin, Amy L. [2 ]
Haywood, Samuel [1 ]
Sjoberg, Daniel D. [2 ]
Benfante, Nicole E. [2 ]
Carlsson, Sigrid, V [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Eastham, James A. [1 ]
Laudone, Vincent [1 ]
Touijer, Karim A. [1 ]
Fine, Samson [4 ]
Scardino, Peter T. [1 ]
Vickers, Andrew J. [2 ]
Ehdaie, Behfar [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, New York, NY USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Inst Clin Sci, Sahlgrenska Acad, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Serv, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2023年 / 9卷 / 04期
关键词
Gleason pattern; Oncological outcomes; Prognosis; Prostate cancer; Active surveillance; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PREOPERATIVE RISK; MEN; RECLASSIFICATION; INTERMEDIATE; PROGRESSION; PATHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Active surveillance (AS) is recommended as the preferred treatment for men with low-risk disease. In order to optimize risk stratification and exclude undiagnosed higher-grade disease, most AS protocols recommend a confirmatory biopsy.Objective: We aimed to compare outcomes among men with grade group (GG) 2/3 prostate cancer on initial biopsy with those among men whose disease was initially GG1 but was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy.Design, setting, and participants: We reviewed patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) in two cohorts: "immediate RP group,"with GG2/3 cancer on diagnostic biopsy, and "AS group,"with GG1 cancer on initial biopsy that was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy.Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Probabilities of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and salvage therapy were determined using multivariable Cox regression models with risk adjustment. Risks of adverse pathology at RP were also compared using logistic regression.Results and limitations: The immediate RP group comprised 4009 patients and the AS group comprised 321 patients. The AS group had lower adjusted rates of adverse pathology (27% vs 35%, p = 0.003). BCR rates were lower in the AS group, although this did not reach conventional significance (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-1.06, p = 0.10) compared with the immediate RP group. Risk-adjusted 1- and 5yr BCR rates were 4.6% (95% CI 3.0-6.5%) and 10.4% (95% CI 6.9-14%), respectively, for the AS group compared with 6.3% (95% CI 5.6-7.0%) and 20% (95% CI 19-22%), respectively, in the immediate RP group. A nonsignificant association was observed for salvage treatment-free survival favoring the AS group (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.42, 1.06, p = 0.087).Conclusions: We found that men with GG1 cancer who were upgraded on confirmatory biopsy tend to have less aggressive disease than men with the same grade found at initial biopsy. These results must be confirmed in larger series before recommendations can
引用
收藏
页码:662 / 668
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OUTCOMES OF GRADE GROUP 2 AND 3 PROSTATE CANCER ON INITIAL VERSUS CONFIRMATORY BIOPSY: IMPLICATIONS FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Perera, Marlon
    Jibara, Ghalib
    Tin, Amy
    Sjoberg, Daniel
    Benfante, Nicole
    Carlsson, Sigrid
    Eastham, James
    Laudone, Vincent
    Fine, Samson
    Scardino, Peter
    Vickers, Andrew
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E525 - E525
  • [2] COMPARATIVE OUTCOMES OF GLEASON GRADE 2 AND 3 PROSTATE CANCER ON INITIAL VERSUS CONFIRMATORY BIOPSY: IMPLICATIONS FOR ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Haywood, Samuel
    Tin, Amy
    Eastham, James
    Laudone, Vincent
    Touijer, Karim
    Scardino, Peter
    Vickers, Andrew
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E698 - E698
  • [3] Outcomes of Active Surveillance after Initial Surveillance Prostate Biopsy
    Kovac, Evan
    Lieser, Gregory
    Elshafei, Ahmed
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Klein, Eric A.
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (01): : 84 - 89
  • [4] Grade Group Underestimation in Prostate Biopsy: Predictive Factors and Outcomes in Candidates for Active Surveillance
    Audenet, Francois
    Rozet, Francois
    Resche-Rigon, Matthieu
    Bernard, Remy
    Ingels, Alexandre
    Prapotnich, Dominique
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Galiano, Marc
    Barret, Eric
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    [J]. CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2017, 15 (06) : E907 - E913
  • [5] EFFECTS OF INITIAL GLEASON GRADE ON OUTCOMES DURING ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Masic, Selma
    Cowan, Janet
    Hao Nguyen
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Cooperberg, Matthew
    Carroll, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E135 - E135
  • [6] EFFECTS OF INITIAL GLEASON GRADE ON OUTCOMES DURING ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE FOR PROSTATE CANCER
    Masic, Selma
    Washington, Samuel
    Cowan, Janet
    Hao Nguyen
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Cooperberg, Matthew
    Carroll, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E522 - E522
  • [7] Effects of Initial Gleason Grade on Outcomes during Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer
    Masic, Selma
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Washington, Samuel L.
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (05): : 386 - 394
  • [8] TIMING OF THE CONFIRMATORY BIOPSY IN PROSTATE CANCER ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE: ANALYSIS OF THE CANARY PROSTATE CANCER ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE STUDY (PASS)
    Macleod, Liam C.
    Ellis, William J.
    Newcomb, Lisa F.
    Zheng, Yingye
    Brooks, James D.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Gleave, Martin E.
    Lance, Raymond S.
    Nelson, Peter S.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Wagner, Andrew A.
    Wei, John T.
    Yang, Hui-Yu
    Lin, Daniel W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E755 - E755
  • [9] OUTCOMES OF SCHEDULED VERSUS FOR CAUSE BIOPSY REGIMENS FOR PROSTATE CANCER ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Altartir, Tareq
    Murekeyisoni, Christine
    Mehedint, Diana
    Kauffman, Eric
    Mohler, James
    Attwood, Kristopher
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E721 - E721
  • [10] TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSY IMPROVES THE DETECTION OF GRADE GROUP 3 OR HIGHER PROSTATE CANCER AMONG MEN ON ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE
    Meyer, Alexa
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Winoker, Jared
    Landis, Patricia
    Allaf, Mohamad
    Gorin, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E951 - E951