Seismicity induced by geological CO2 storage: A review

被引:12
|
作者
Cheng, Yuxiang [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Wenna [1 ]
Xu, Tianfu [1 ]
Zhang, Yanjun [3 ]
Zhang, Xinwen [1 ,4 ]
Xing, Yunyan [5 ]
Feng, Bo [1 ]
Xia, Yi [6 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Key Lab Groundwater Resource & Environm, Minist Educ, Changchun, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Engn Res Ctr Geothermal Resources Dev Technol & Eq, Minist Educ, Changchun 130026, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Univ, Construct Engn Coll, Ximinzhu St, Changchun, Peoples R China
[4] Shuangyang Dist Procuratorate Changchun City, Changchun, Peoples R China
[5] Jingyu Cty Dev & Reform Bur, Bai Shan City, Jingyu County, Peoples R China
[6] Northeast Elect Power Design Inst, Changchun, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Carbon capture and storage; Injection induced seismicity; CO2; injection; THMC coupling; Seismic magnitude prediction; INJECTION-INDUCED SEISMICITY; PORE PRESSURE DIFFUSION; OTWAY PROJECT SITE; COGDELL OIL-FIELD; RISK-ASSESSMENT; GEOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; FAULT REACTIVATION; FLUID INJECTION; ILLINOIS BASIN; RESERVOIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104369
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Geological storage is a valuable strategy for reducing CO2 emissions to the atmosphere, although seismicity induced by CO2 injection can be a serious hazard that also becomes an obstacle to the development of CO2 geological storage. The most important challenge in this field is fault systems that are difficult to detect and that have complex activation mechanisms, making the evaluation, prediction and control of CO2 injection induced seismicity extremely difficult. It is also challenging to determine the triggering mechanism of injection induced seismicity. To promote the solution of these problems, we first review the experience and lessons learned from recent induced seismicity monitored in CO2 geological storage (CGS) projects, and summarize the mechanisms that can be used to analyze CO2 injection induced seismicity, including critical pressure theory, Biot's incre-mental strain theory, rate-and state-dependent frictional theory and fracture potential theory. We then discuss the theory and modeling of thermo-hydro-mechanical-chemical (THMC) coupling in CGS-induced seismicity. Knowledge of THMC coupling is an efficient way to improve the prediction of fault activation and seismic ac-tivity and enables characterization of pore pressure perturbation, temperature changes, and stress and geochemical effects. Through THMC simulation, we can more accurately characterize the change process of stress field, analyze and speculate the triggering and spatio-temporal evolution of induced earthquakes. We also summarize the advantages and disadvantages of maximum magnitude prediction based on statistical and physical models. The statistical method is easy to use, but ignores the physical characteristics of the reservoir. Although physical method overcomes this deficiency, obtaining sufficient modeling input parameters is always an challenging work. Finally, we analyze the challenges involved in the seismicity forecasting, including the quantification of stress state, the identification and characterization of complex fault system, the seismic miti-gation injection scheme design, and reasonable seismic risk analysis model selection. This paper focuses on the scientific function of THMC coupling in the studies of CO2 injection induced seismicity, so as to provide reference and guidance for the researches on the mechanism analysis and forecasting of such induced seismicity.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Geomechanical modeling of CO2 geological storage:A review
    Pengzhi Pan
    Zhenhua Wu
    Xiating Feng
    Fei Yan
    [J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 8 (06) : 936 - 947
  • [2] A Review of Laboratory Experiments for CO2 Geological Storage
    Oh, Jun-Ho
    Kim, Kue-Young
    Vim, Taehee
    Kim, Jeong-Chan
    [J]. ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2010, 43 (03): : 291 - 304
  • [3] Geomechanical modeling of CO2 geological storage: A review
    Pan, Pengzhi
    Wu, Zhenhua
    Feng, Xiating
    Yan, Fei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 8 (06) : 936 - 947
  • [4] Induced seismicity and its implications for CO2 storage risk
    Nicol, A.
    Carne, R.
    Gerstenberger, M.
    Christophersen, A.
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 3699 - 3706
  • [5] CO2/brine interfacial tension for geological CO2 storage: A systematic review
    Zhang, Cheng
    Wang, Milei
    [J]. GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 220
  • [6] A review of numerical simulation methods for geomechanical problems induced by CO2 geological storage
    Li Xiao-chun
    Yuan Wei
    Bai Bing
    [J]. ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2016, 37 (06) : 1762 - 1772
  • [7] CO2 geological storage: A review on present and future prospects
    Zahid, Umer
    Lim, Youngsub
    Jung, Jaeheum
    Han, Chonghun
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 28 (03) : 674 - 685
  • [8] Environmental considerations for subseabed geological storage of CO2: A review
    Carroll, A. G.
    Przeslawski, R.
    Radke, L. C.
    Black, J. R.
    Picard, K.
    Moreau, J. W.
    Haese, R. R.
    Nichol, S.
    [J]. CONTINENTAL SHELF RESEARCH, 2014, 83 : 116 - 128
  • [9] Geomechanical challenges during geological CO2 storage: A review
    Song, Youngsoo
    Jun, Sungjun
    Na, Yoonsu
    Kim, Kyuhyun
    Jang, Youngho
    Wang, Jihoon
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 456
  • [10] CO2 geological storage: A review on present and future prospects
    Umer Zahid
    Youngsub Lim
    Jaeheum Jung
    Chonghun Han
    [J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2011, 28 : 674 - 685