Multiple ecosystem services of informal green spaces: A literature review

被引:23
|
作者
Luo, Sitong [1 ,2 ]
Patuano, Agnes [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Landscape Architecture & Spatial Planning Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Amsterdam Inst Adv Metropolitan Solut, AMS Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Informal green space; Ecosystem service; Landscape architecture; ES trade-offs; ES synergies; Urban green infrastructure; PUBLIC-HEALTH; URBAN; BIODIVERSITY; WILD; INFRASTRUCTURES; ASSESSMENTS; STORMWATER; LANDSCAPES; WILDERNESS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127849
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Informal green spaces (IGS) such as overgrown vacant lots and urban brownfields constitute a considerable amount of green resources in the city. Given that the increasingly competitive land use of the urban area, enhancing the potential ecosystem services (ES) of IGS through design and management practices is of critical importance. This literature review paper provides an overview of ES delivered by urban IGS: What types of IGS have been discussed? Which ES have been identified in IGS, what interrelationships among different types of ES have been identified, and how can the potential of IGS be enhanced by urban design practices? 112 scientific papers were analyzed for their 1) IGS terms applied, 2) ES studied, 3) current or potential ES discussed, 4) ES trade-offs, and 5) ES assessment methods. Through the review, we found that although different types of ES have been identified in IGS, most studies did not consider ES synergies and trade-offs. The few studies assessing trade-offs of ES in IGS mostly focused on large-scale IGS such as urban brownfields rather than on small-scale IGS such as vacant lands/lots. The literature review highlights two knowledge gaps for future research: the first one is to explore the design and management knowledge that integrate multiple ES in small-scale IGS based on the assessment of potential ES trade-offs and synergies; the second one is to develop the spatial assessment of ES trade-offs and synergies, which is the key to envision design and management interventions that optimize the benefits of IGS. The literature review promotes the acknowledgement of the term IGS through highlighting their value in ES provisioning and further outlines future research directions on small-scale IGS such as vacant lands/ lots and patches of spontaneous vegetation.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The value of doing nothing - How informal green spaces can provide comparable ecosystem services to cultivated urban parks
    Sikorski, Piotr
    Gawryszewska, Beata
    Sikorska, Daria
    Chormanski, Jaroslaw
    Schwerk, Axel
    Jojczyk, Agata
    Ciezkowski, Wojciech
    Archicinski, Piotr
    Lepkowski, Maciej
    Dymitryszyn, Izabela
    Przybysz, Arkadiusz
    Winska-Krysiak, Marzena
    Zajdel, Barbara
    Matusiak, Jaroslaw
    Laszkiewicz, Edyta
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 50
  • [2] Effect of ecosystem services provided by urban green infrastructure on indoor environment: A literature review
    Wang, Yafei
    Bakker, Frank
    de Groot, Rudolf
    Wortche, Heinrich
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 77 : 88 - 100
  • [3] Adaptive governance to promote ecosystem services in urban green spaces
    Olivia Odom Green
    Ahjond S. Garmestani
    Sandra Albro
    Natalie C. Ban
    Adam Berland
    Caitlin E. Burkman
    Mary M. Gardiner
    Lance Gunderson
    Matthew E. Hopton
    Michael L. Schoon
    William D. Shuster
    [J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2016, 19 : 77 - 93
  • [4] Multidisciplinary approaches for programming ecosystem services of urban green spaces
    Bortolini, L.
    Semenzato, P.
    Almasi, B.
    Csizmadia, D.
    Kowalski, P.
    Racon-Leja, K.
    Aarrevaara, E.
    Scherzer, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GREENER CITIES FOR MORE EFFICIENT ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN A CLIMATE CHANGING WORLD, 2018, 1215 : 411 - 414
  • [5] Valuing Ecosystem Services and Disservices across Heterogeneous Green Spaces
    Klimas, Christie
    Williams, Allison
    Hoff, Megan
    Lawrence, Beth
    Thompson, Jennifer
    Montgomery, James
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (09)
  • [6] Adaptive governance to promote ecosystem services in urban green spaces
    Green, Olivia Odom
    Garmestani, Ahjond S.
    Albro, Sandra
    Ban, Natalie C.
    Berland, Adam
    Burkman, Caitlin E.
    Gardiner, Mary M.
    Gunderson, Lance
    Hopton, Matthew E.
    Schoon, Michael L.
    Shuster, William D.
    [J]. URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2016, 19 (01) : 77 - 93
  • [7] Cultural Heritage and Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review
    Holleland, Herdis
    Skrede, Joar
    Holmgaard, Sanne Bech
    [J]. CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES, 2017, 19 (03) : 210 - 237
  • [8] Governance of ecosystem services: a review of empirical literature
    Winkler, Klara Johanna
    Garcia Rodrigues, Joao
    Albrecht, Eerika
    Crockett, Erin T. H.
    [J]. ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2021, 17 (01) : 306 - 319
  • [9] Ecosystem services and well-being dimensions related to urban green spaces-A systematic review
    Pinto, Luis Valenca
    Inacio, Miguel
    Ferreira, Carla Sofia Santos
    Ferreira, Antonio Dinis
    Pereira, Paulo
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 85
  • [10] A systematic review on the ecosystem services provided by green infrastructure
    Jato-Espino, Daniel
    Capra-Ribeiro, Fabio
    Moscardo, Vanessa
    Mayor-Vitoria, Fernando
    Gallardo, Laura O.
    Carracedo, Patricia
    Dietrich, Kristin
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2023, 86