Integrating environmental and satellite data to estimate county-level cotton yield in Xinjiang Province

被引:8
|
作者
Lang, Ping [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Lifu [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Changping [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Jiahua [1 ,2 ]
Kang, Xiaoyan [1 ]
Zhang, Ze [3 ]
Tong, Qingxi [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Shihezi Univ, Coll Agr, Xinjiang Prod & Construct Crops Oasis Ecoagr Key L, Shihezi, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
remote sensing; climate variables; GEE; deep learning; yield estimation; cotton; VEGETATION INDEX; TIME-SERIES; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; CLIMATE DATA; CROP YIELD; SELECTION; WEATHER; SYSTEM; IMPACT; IMAGES;
D O I
10.3389/fpls.2022.1048479
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Accurate and timely estimation of cotton yield over large areas is essential for precision agriculture, facilitating the operation of commodity markets and guiding agronomic management practices. Remote sensing (RS) and crop models are effective means to predict cotton yield in the field. The satellite vegetation indices (VIs) can describe crop yield variations over large areas but can't take the exact environmental impact into consideration. Climate variables (CVs), the result of the influence of spatial heterogeneity in large regions, can provide environmental information for better estimation of cotton yield. In this study, the most important VIs and CVs for estimating county-level cotton yield across Xinjiang Province were screened out. We found that the VIs of canopy structure and chlorophyll contents, and the CVs of moisture, were the most significant factors for cotton growth. For yield estimation, we utilized four approaches: least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO), support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR) and long short-term memory (LSTM). Due to its ability to capture temporal features over the long term, LSTM performed best, with an R-2 of 0.76, root mean square error (RMSE) of 150 kg/ha and relative RMSE (rRMSE) of 8.67%; moreover, an additional 10% of the variance could be explained by adding CVs to the VIs. For the within-season yield estimation using LSTM, predictions made 2 months before harvest were the most accurate (R-2 = 0.65, RMSE = 220 kg/ha, rRMSE = 15.97%). Our study demonstrated the feasibility of yield estimation and early prediction at the county level over large cotton cultivation areas by integrating satellite and environmental data.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrating climate and satellite remote sensing data for predicting county-level wheat yield in China using machine learning methods
    Zhou, Weimo
    Liu, Yujie
    Ata-Ul-Karim, Syed Tahir
    Ge, Quansheng
    Li, Xing
    Xiao, Jingfeng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2022, 111
  • [2] Combining Optical, Fluorescence, Thermal Satellite, and Environmental Data to Predict County-Level Maize Yield in China Using Machine Learning Approaches
    Zhang, Liangliang
    Zhang, Zhao
    Luo, Yuchuan
    Cao, Juan
    Tao, Fulu
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [3] Mid-season county-level corn yield forecast for US Corn Belt integrating satellite imagery and weather variables
    Schwalbert, Rai
    Amado, Telmo
    Nieto, Luciana
    Corassa, Geomar
    Rice, Charles
    Peralta, Nahuel
    Schauberger, Bernhard
    Gornott, Christoph
    Ciampitti, Ignacio
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2020, 60 (02) : 739 - 750
  • [4] COUNTY-LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND ASSOCIATIONS WITH INDIVIDUAL- AND COUNTY-LEVEL PRETERM BIRTH.
    Messer, Lynne
    Rappazzo, Kristen
    Jagai, Jyotnsa
    Lobdell, Danelle
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 177 : S156 - S156
  • [5] Deriving comprehensive county-level crop yield and area data for US cropland
    Lokupitiya, Erandathie
    Breidt, F. Jay
    Lokupitiya, Ravindra
    Williams, Steve
    Paustian, Keith
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2007, 99 (03) : 673 - 681
  • [6] Study on the county-level economic spatial-temporal disparity in Xinjiang
    Chen Xuegang
    Yang Zhaoping
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE CHINA ASSOCIATION FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL 4, NO 3, 2008, : 163 - 167
  • [7] Integrating County-Level Socioeconomic Data for COVID-19 Forecasting in the United States
    Lucic, Michael C.
    Ghazzai, Hakim
    Lipizzi, Carlo
    Massoud, Yehia
    [J]. IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 2 : 235 - 248
  • [8] Measurement error in county-level UCR data
    Lott, JR
    Whitley, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2003, 19 (02) : 185 - 198
  • [9] PARTNERING TO DEVELOP COUNTY-LEVEL DATA PROFILES
    Phillips, Karon
    Wolfe, Megan
    [J]. INNOVATION IN AGING, 2022, 6 : 570 - 570
  • [10] Measurement Error in County-Level UCR Data
    John R. Lott
    John Whitley
    [J]. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2003, 19 : 185 - 198