Communication profiles and sport experiences of collegiate track and field athletes

被引:2
|
作者
Pacewicz, Christine E. [1 ,3 ]
Smith, Alan L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Miami Univ, Dept Sport Leadership & Management, Oxford, OH USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Kinesiol & Hlth Sci, Logan, UT USA
[3] Miami Univ, Dept Sport Leadership & Management, 551 East High St, Laws Hall, 219B, Oxford, OH 45056 USA
关键词
Athlete burnout; Athlete engagement; Motivation; Peers; INTRA-TEAM COMMUNICATION; CO-RUMINATION; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; SOCIAL IDENTITY; TASK COHESION; LATENT CLASS; COMMITMENT; SCALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102450
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objectives: Athletes often communicate with one another and exchange information, attitudes, and feelings that can influence their sport experiences. In an effort to better understand the sport communication context, the purpose of the current study was to (a) describe communication profiles of athletes (b) examine potential pre-dictors (i.e., team identity, sex) of profile membership, and (c) examine the salience of these profiles by assessing profile group differences on athletes' perceptions of burnout, engagement, satisfaction, and enjoyment.Design: Cross-sectional survey-based study.Method: Collegiate track and field athletes (N = 219) completed measures of demographic information, team communication, team identity, burnout, engagement, enjoyment, and satisfaction. Communication profiles were examined using latent profile analysis. Using the three-step method in Mplus, possible prediction of profile membership and profile differences in perceptions of sport experiences were examined.Results: Three profiles emerged: the Less Effective Communicators, the Supportive Communicators, and the Functional Communicators. Athletes with greater team identity were more likely to be in the Supportive Com-municators profile (p < 0.001), male participants were more likely to be in the Functional Communicators profile (p < 0.05) than the other profiles, and female participants were less likely to be in the Less Effective Commu-nicators profile than the Supportive Communicators profile (p < 0.05). The Less Effective Communicators had greater perceptions of burnout (ps < 0.01) and lower perceptions of engagement (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05), satisfaction (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001), and enjoyment (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05) than the Supportive and Functional Communicators. Supportive Communicators had greater satisfaction (p < 0.001) and enjoyment (p < 0.001) than the Functional Communicators.Conclusions: Different profiles of communication in track and field athletes may have implications for athletes' sport experiences and warrant continued study.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Collegiate Athletes' Expectations and Experiences With Mindful Sport Performance Enhancement
    Mistretta, Erin G.
    Glass, Carol R.
    Spears, Claire A.
    Perskaudas, Rokas
    Kaufman, Keith A.
    Hoyer, Dennis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 11 (03) : 201 - 221
  • [2] Nutrient Intake of Female Collegiate Track and Field Athletes
    Crotts, Lori M.
    Battista, Rebecca A.
    Benson, Marni
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2013, 45 (05): : 550 - 550
  • [3] Communication Profiles and Motivational Experiences of Athletes
    Pacewicz, Christine E.
    Smith, Alan L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 42 : S99 - S99
  • [4] Sport experiences of Division I collegiate athletes and their perceptions of the importance of specialization
    Martin, Eric M.
    Ewing, Martha E.
    Oregon, Evelyn
    [J]. HIGH ABILITY STUDIES, 2017, 28 (02) : 149 - 165
  • [5] A randomized controlled study of mindful sport performance enhancement and psychological skills training with collegiate track and field athletes
    Hut, Megan
    Minkler, Thomas O.
    Glass, Carol R.
    Weppner, Caroline H.
    Thomas, Hannah M.
    Flannery, Claire B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 35 (02) : 284 - 306
  • [6] MOOD PROFILES OF MASTERS TRACK AND FIELD ATHLETES
    UNGERLEIDER, S
    GOLDING, JM
    PORTER, K
    [J]. PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1989, 68 (02) : 607 - 617
  • [7] The Research on Sport Motivation of the College Track and Field Athletes
    Tie, Yu
    Xu, Yinghua
    [J]. 2011 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND SPORTS EDUCATION (ESE 2011), VOL II, 2011, : 279 - 281
  • [8] The Research on the Sport Motivation of the University Track and Field Athletes
    Liu Deming
    [J]. 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION INNOVATION (EBMEI 2013), VOL 18, 2013, 18 : 499 - 504
  • [9] PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF COLLEGIATE TRACK AND FIELD ATHLETES WITH LOW BACK PAIN
    Saito, Yoshinobu
    Iwai, Kazunori
    Nakazato, Koichi
    Irie, Kazunori
    Mizuno, Masuhiko
    Nakajima, Hiroyuki
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL FITNESS AND SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 58 (01) : 99 - 108
  • [10] Bone Metabolism Markers In Collegiate Female Track-and-field Athletes
    Wakamatsu, Kenta
    Sakuraba, Keishoku
    Fujita, Shinpei
    Sanomura, Manabu
    Mukaimoto, Takahiro
    Kubota, Atsushi
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2014, 46 (05): : 54 - 54