Meta-analysis of pulsed-field ablation versus cryoablation for atrial fibrillation

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Hehua [1 ]
Zhang, Hua [2 ]
Lu, Heng [3 ]
Mao, Yinjun [4 ]
Chen, Jianxing [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Jiangle Gen Hosp Fujian Prov, Dept Anesthesiol, Sanming, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg Nursing, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Natl Reg Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, Binhai Campus, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Anesthesiol, Fuzhou Fuzhou350005, Peoples R China
[6] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Natl Reg Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Binhai Campus, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
atrial fibrillation; cryoballoon ablation; meta-analysis; procedural efficiency; pulsed-field ablation; PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION; CRYOBALLOON; RADIOFREQUENCY; RELEASE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/pace.14971
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeThe available data on the treatment strategy of pulsed field ablation (PFA) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited. This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of the efficacy, safety, and procedural efficiency between PFA and cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for AF.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of the EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify trials comparing PFA with CBA for AF from their inception until December 2023. The odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD), along with a 95% confidence interval (CI), were utilized as measures of treatment effect.ResultsThe analysis included 15 eligible trials with a total enrollment of 1880 patients. No significant differences were found in recurrent atrial arrhythmia (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.64, 1.07) or periprocedural complications (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.46, 1.30) between the two ablation techniques examined in this study. However, the PFA technique demonstrated a significantly shorter procedure time (MD -7.17, 95% CI -13.60, -0.73), but a longer fluoroscopy time (MD 2.53, 95% CI 0.87, 4.19). Similarly, PFA was found to be significantly associated with a decreased incidence of phrenic nerve palsy (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07, 0.59), but an increased incidence of cardiac tamponade (OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.15, 14.39). Moreover, there was a significantly higher release of troponin with PFA compared to CBA (MD 470.28, 95% CI 18.89, 921.67), while the increase in S100 protein and heart rate was significantly lower with PFA than with CBA (MD -64.41, 95% CI -105.46, -17.36), (MD -8.76, 95% CI -15.12, -2.40).ConclusionThe utilization of PFA provides a safer, time-saving, and tissue-specific procedure compared to CBA, while maintaining comparable success rates. This has the potential to enhance procedural efficiency and optimize resource utilization in clinical practice. These findings underscore the feasibility and promise of PFA as an alternative technique for PVI in patients with AF.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 613
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pulsed-field ablation versus thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis
    de Campos, Maria Clara Azzi Vaz
    Moraes, Vitor Ryuiti Yamamoto
    Daher, Rafael Ferreira
    Micheleto, Jose Pedro Cassemiro
    Campos, Luiza Azzi Vaz de
    Barros, Guilherme Fleury Alves
    de Oliveira, Heitor Martins
    Barros, Lorrany Pereira
    Menezes Jr, Antonio da Silva
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2024, 5 (06) : 385 - 395
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of pulsed-field versus conventional thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Amin, Ahmed Mazen
    Nazir, Abubakar
    Abuelazm, Mohamed T.
    Ibrahim, Ahmed A.
    Elbenawi, Hossam
    Aboutaleb, Aya
    Ellabban, Mohamed
    Arnaout, Moumen
    Turkmani, Mustafa
    Abdelazeem, Basel
    Volgman, Annabelle S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2024,
  • [3] PULSED FIELD ABLATION VERSUS THERMAL ABLATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Rivera, Andre
    Braga, Marcelo
    Bezerra, Gabriel
    Felix, Nicole S.
    Costa, Thomaz
    Clemente, Mariana
    Fernandes, Amanda
    Ternes, Caique M. P.
    Costa Fernandes Filho, Gilson M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 228 - 228
  • [4] Editorial to "Efficacy and safety of pulsed-field versus conventional thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis"
    Kuroki, Kenji
    Sato, Akira
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2024,
  • [5] Radiofrequency Ablation versus Cryoablation in the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis
    Hachem, Ali H.
    Marine, Joseph E.
    Tahboub, Housam A.
    Kamdar, Sana
    Kanjwal, Shaffi
    Soni, Ronak
    Kanjwal, Khalil
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2018, 2018
  • [6] A NETWORK META-ANALYSIS COMPARING PULSED-FIELD ABLATION (PFA) AND OTHER CURRENT ABLATION THERAPIES FOR PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
    Piccolo, S.
    Varotto, L.
    Borio, G.
    Paccanaro, M.
    Rossillo, A.
    Vittadello, S.
    Caprioglio, F.
    Bonanno, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2024, 26 : ii7 - ii7
  • [7] Pulsed-Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation The Future Is Now?
    Mathuria, Nilesh
    [J]. JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 7 (05) : 628 - 629
  • [8] Pulsed-field ablation: a breakthrough treatment for atrial fibrillation
    De Potter, Tom
    [J]. FUTURE CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 19 (07) : 371 - 373
  • [9] Pulsed-field ablation: a revolution in atrial fibrillation therapy
    Maizels, Leonid
    Kalman, Jonathan M.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 21 (08) : 519 - 520
  • [10] Pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation without the use of fluoroscopy
    Palmeri, Nicholas O.
    Alyesh, Daniel
    Keith, Madison
    Greenhaw, Erin
    Erickson, Cooper
    Choe, William
    Sundaram, Sri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024,