Acceptability of Personalized Lung Cancer Screening Program Among Primary Care Providers

被引:0
|
作者
Resong, Paul J. [1 ,2 ]
Niu, Jiangong [1 ]
Duhon, Gabrielle F. [1 ]
Foxhall, Lewis E. [3 ]
Shete, Sanjay [4 ,5 ]
Volk, Robert J. [1 ]
Toumazis, Iakovos [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Reno Sch Med, Reno, NV USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Clin Canc Prevent, Div OVP Canc Prevent & Populat Sci, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
RISK PREDICTION MODEL; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-23-0359
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Personalized LCS facilitated by a risk model and/or a biomarker test is proposed as an alternative to existing programs. Acceptability of personalized approach among PCPs is unknown. The goal of this study is to assess the acceptability of personalized LCS among PCPs. Current lung cancer screening (LCS) guidelines rely on age and smoking history. Despite its benefit, only 5%-15% of eligible patients receive LCS. Personalized screening strategies select individuals based on their lung cancer risk and may increase LCS's effectiveness. We assess current LCS practices and the acceptability of personalized LCS among primary care providers (PCP) in Texas. We surveyed 32,983 Texas-based PCPs on an existing network (Protocol 2019-1257; PI: Dr. Shete) and 300 attendees of the 2022 Texas Academy of Family Physicians (TAFP) conference. We analyzed the responses by subgroups of interest. Using nonparametric bootstrap, we derived an enriched dataset to develop logistic regression models to understand current LCS practices and acceptability of personalized LCS. Response rates were 0.3% (n = 91) and 15% (n = 60) for the 2019-1257 and TAFP surveys, respectively. Most (84%) respondents regularly assess LCS in their practice. Half of the respondents were interested in adopting personalized LCS. The majority (66%) of respondents expressed concerns regarding time availability with the personalized LCS. Most respondents would use biomarkers as an adjunct to assess eligibility (58%), or to help guide indeterminate clinical findings (63%). There is a need to enhance the engagement of Texas-based PCPs in LCS. Most of the respondents expressed interest in personalized LCS. Time availability was the main concern related to personalized LCS. Findings from this project highlight the need for better education of Texas-based PCPs on the benefits of LCS, and the development of efficient decision tools to ensure successful implementation of personalized LCS.Prevention Relevance: Personalized LCS facilitated by a risk model and/or a biomarker test is proposed as an alternative to existing programs. Acceptability of personalized approach among PCPs is unknown. The goal of this study is to assess the acceptability of personalized LCS among PCPs.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 58
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Primary care providers' views on a future lung cancer screening program
    O'Brien, Mary Ann
    Llovet, Diego
    Sullivan, Frank
    Paszat, Lawrence
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2019, 36 (04) : 501 - 505
  • [2] ATTITUDES ABOUT LUNG CANCER SCREENING AMONG PRIMARY CARE PROVIDERS
    Doshi, Dhvani
    Rosenberg, Alexandra
    Wisnivesky, Juan P.
    Lin, Jenny
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 : S109 - S109
  • [3] Primary Care Providers' Views On Lung Cancer Screening
    Kanodra, N. M.
    Pope, C.
    Rice, L. J.
    Halbert, C. Hughes
    Tanner, N. T.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 193
  • [4] Lung cancer screening knowledge and beliefs among primary care providers and pulmonologists.
    Marsh, Katie
    Greenwood-Hickman, Mikael Anne
    Jones, Laura
    Rivera, M. Patricia
    Bowling, J. Michael
    Molina, Paul
    Maygarden, Susan
    Birchard, Katherine
    Reuland, Dan
    Henderson, Louise
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (07)
  • [5] Assessing Knowledge, Barriers, And Facilitators To Lung Cancer Screening Among Primary Care And Pulmonary Providers
    Triplette, M.
    Kross, E. K.
    Mann, B.
    Elmore, J. G.
    Slatore, C. G.
    Shahrir, S.
    Fredenck, P. D.
    Romine, P. E.
    Crothers, K. A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 195
  • [6] Understanding primary care providers' role preferences in a future lung cancer screening program: a qualitative inquiry
    O'Brien, Mary Ann
    Llovet, Diego
    Sullivan, Frank
    Paszat, Lawrence
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2015, 24 : 34 - 34
  • [7] Lung cancer screening primer Key information for primary care providers
    Wilkinson, Anna N.
    Lam, Stephen
    [J]. CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2021, 67 (11) : 817 - 822
  • [8] BC Cancer Lung Screening Program: Insights on a risk model-based approach for primary care providers
    Lam, Stephen
    Sam, Janette
    Lui, Javis
    Zhang, Yue
    Mayo, John
    [J]. BRITISH COLUMBIA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 65 (03): : 84 - 87
  • [9] Lung Cancer Screening Program via Primary Care Clinics
    Cuvi, D.
    Flowers, R.
    Hue, L.
    Balbin, E.
    Holt, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [10] Attitudes About Lung Cancer Screening: Primary Care Providers Versus Specialists
    Rajupet, Sritha
    Doshi, Dhvani
    Wisnivesky, Juan P.
    Lin, Jenny J.
    [J]. CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2017, 18 (06) : E417 - E423