共 50 条
Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec vs Once-Daily Insulin Degludec in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes The ONWARDS 3 Randomized Clinical Trial
被引:71
|作者:
Lingvay, Ildiko
[1
,2
]
Asong, Marisse
[3
]
Desouza, Cyrus
[4
]
Gourdy, Pierre
[5
,6
]
Kar, Soumitra
[7
]
Vianna, Andre
[8
]
Vilsboll, Tina
[9
,10
]
Vinther, Siri
[3
]
Mu, Yiming
[11
]
机构:
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Div Endocrinol, Dept Internal Med, Dallas, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Peter ODonnell Jr Sch Publ Hlth, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Novo Nordisk AS, Soborg, Denmark
[4] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE USA
[5] Univ Toulouse 3, CHU Toulouse, Inserm, Toulouse, France
[6] Univ Toulouse 3, UMR1297, Inserm, I2MC, Toulouse, France
[7] Novo Nordisk Serv Ctr India Private Ltd, Bangalore, India
[8] Hosp Nossa Senhora Gracas, Curitiba Diabet Ctr, Dept Endocrine Dis, Curitiba, Brazil
[9] Univ Copenhagen, Steno Diabet Ctr Copenhagen, Clin Res, Herlev, Denmark
[10] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[11] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Med Ctr 1, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源:
关键词:
GLYCEMIC CONTROL;
GLARGINE;
HYPOGLYCEMIA;
MANAGEMENT;
PEOPLE;
D O I:
10.1001/jama.2023.11313
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
IMPORTANCE Once-weekly insulin icodec could provide a simpler dosing alternative to daily basal insulin in people with type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly icodec vs once-daily insulin degludec in people with insulin-naive type 2 diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, double-masked, noninferiority, treat-to-target, phase 3a trial conducted from March 2021 to June 2022 at 92 sites in 11 countries in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with any noninsulin glucose-lowering agents with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7%-11% (53-97 mmol/mol). INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either once-weekly icodec and once-daily placebo (icodec group; n = 294) or once-daily degludec and once-weekly placebo (degludec group; n = 294). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end pointwas change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26 (noninferiority margin, 0.3% percentage points). Secondary end points included change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 26, mean weekly insulin dose during the last 2 weeks of treatment, body weight change from baseline to week 26, and number of level 2 (clinically significant; glucose level <54mg/dL) and level 3 (severe; requiring external assistance for recovery) hypoglycemic episodes. RESULTS Among 588 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 58 [10] years; 219 [37%] women), 564 (96%) completed the trial. Mean HbA1c level decreased from 8.6%(observed) to 7.0% (estimated) at 26 weeks in the icodec group and from 8.5%(observed) to 7.2% (estimated) in the degludec group (estimated treatment difference [ETD], -0.2 [95% CI, -0.3 to -0.1] percentage points), confirming noninferiority (P <.001) and superiority (P =.002). There were no significant differences between the icodec and degludec groups for fasting plasma glucose change from baseline to week 26 (ETD, 0 [95% CI, -6 to 5] mg/dL; P =.90), mean weekly insulin dose during the last 2 weeks of treatment, or body weight change from baseline to week 26 (2.8 kg vs 2.3 kg; ETD, 0.46 [95% CI, -0.19 to 1.10] kg; P =.17). Combined level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia rates were numerically higher in the icodec group than the degludec group from week 0 to 31 (0.31 vs 0.15 events per patient-year exposure; P =.11) and statistically higher in the icodec group from week 0 to 26 (0.35 vs 0.12 events per patient-year exposure; P =.01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among people with insulin-naive type 2 diabetes, once-weekly icodec demonstrated superior HbA1c reduction to once-daily degludec after 26 weeks of treatment, with no difference in weight change and a higher rate of combined level 2 or 3 hypoglycemic events in the context of less than 1 event per patient-year exposure in both groups.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 237
页数:10
相关论文