An efficient strategy to select head and neck cancer patients for adaptive radiotherapy

被引:5
|
作者
Gan, Yong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Langendijk, Johannes A. [1 ]
Schaaf, Arjen van der [1 ]
Bosch, Lisa van den [1 ]
Oldehinkel, Edwin [1 ]
Lin, Zhixiong [2 ]
Both, Stefan [1 ]
Brouwer, Charlotte L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Shantou Univ, Med Coll, Dept Radiotherapy, Canc Hosp, Shantou, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Radiat Oncol, POB 30001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Head and neck cancer; Adaptive radiotherapy; Organs at risk; Dosimetric changes; Normal Tissue Complication Probability; Patient selection; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RADIATION-THERAPY; TOXICITY; REGISTRATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109763
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is workload intensive but only benefits a subgroup of patients. We aimed to develop an efficient strategy to select candidates for ART in the first two weeks of head and neck cancer (HNC) radiotherapy. Materials and methods: This study retrospectively enrolled 110 HNC patients who underwent modern photon radiotherapy with at least 5 weekly in-treatment re-scan CTs. A semi auto-segmentation method was applied to obtain the weekly mean dose (Dmean) to OARs. A comprehensive NTCP-profile was applied to obtain NTCP's. The difference between planning and actual values of Dmean (ADmean) and dichotomized difference of clinical relevance (BIOANTCP) were used for modelling to determine the cut-off maximum ADmean of OARs in week 1 and 2 (maxADmean_1 and maxADmean_2). Four strategies to select candidates for ART, using cut-off maxADmean were compared. Results: The Spearman's rank correlation test showed significant positive correlation between maxADmean and BIOANTCP (p-value <0.001). For major BIOANTCP (>5%) of acute and late toxicity, 10.9% and 4.5% of the patients were true candidates for ART. Strategy C using both cut-off maxADmean_1(3.01 and 5.14 Gy) and cut-off maxADmean_2 (3.41 and 5.30 Gy) showed the best sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (0.92, 0.82, 0.38, 0.99 for acute toxicity and 1.00, 0.92, 0.38, 1.00 for late toxicity, respectively). Conclusions: We propose an efficient selection strategy for ART that is able to classify the subgroup of patients with >5% BIOANTCP for late toxicity using imaging in the first two treatment weeks. & COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Radiotherapy and Oncology 186 (2023) 1-7 This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simple strategy to select head and neck cancer patients for adaptive radiotherapy in the first week
    Gan, Y.
    Langendijk, J. A.
    van der Schaaf, A.
    van den Bosch, L.
    Oldehinkel, E.
    Lin, Z.
    Both, S.
    Brouwer, C. L.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S425 - S426
  • [2] Adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients
    Duma, M. N.
    Winkler, C.
    Kampfer, S.
    Jakob, V.
    Schill, S.
    Pigorsch, S.
    Molls, M.
    Geinitz, H.
    [J]. STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2009, 185 : 87 - 87
  • [3] Adaptive Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer
    Castadot, Pierre
    Lee, John A.
    Geets, Xavier
    Gregoire, Vincent
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2010, 20 (02) : 84 - 93
  • [4] Adaptive Radiotherapy for Head Neck Cancer
    Mali S.B.
    [J]. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2016, 15 (4) : 549 - 554
  • [5] Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer
    Castelli, J.
    Simon, A.
    Lafond, C.
    Perichon, N.
    Rigaud, B.
    Chajon, E.
    De Bari, B.
    Ozsahin, M.
    Bourhis, J.
    de Crevoisier, R.
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2018, 57 (10) : 1284 - 1292
  • [6] Strategy for adaptive proton therapy for patients with head and neck cancer
    Samsoe, E.
    Jensen, K.
    Hansen, C. R.
    Skyt, P. S.
    Friborg, J.
    Smulders, B.
    Bahij, I.
    Schouboe, A.
    Randers, P.
    Vestergaard, A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S896 - S897
  • [7] Evaluation of a Screening Method for Adaptive Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer Patients
    Gros, S.
    Roeske, J.
    Surucu, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [8] IS ADAPTIVE RADIOTHERAPY NECESSARY IN HEAD AND NECK CANCER PATIENTS UNDERGOING IMRT?
    Senkesen
    Tezcanli, E.
    Goksel, E.
    Garipagaoglu, M.
    Sengoz, M.
    Kucucuk, H.
    Aslay, I. S.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S447 - S447
  • [9] Selection of head and neck cancer patients for adaptive radiotherapy to decrease xerostomia
    Brouwer, Charlotte L.
    Steenbakkers, Roel J. H. M.
    van der Schaaf, Arjen
    Sopacua, Chantal T. C.
    van Dijk, Lisanne V.
    Kierkels, Roel G. J.
    Bijl, Hendrik P.
    Burgerhof, Johannes G. M.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Sijtsema, Nanna M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 (01) : 36 - 40
  • [10] Head and neck adaptive radiotherapy: A tool for the detection of patients requiring adaptive radiotherapy
    Huger, S.
    Graff, P.
    Marchesi, V.
    Vogin, G.
    Guinement, L.
    Serre, A. A.
    Peiffert, D.
    [J]. CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2015, 19 (6-7): : 463 - 470