Impact of DHCWs' Safety Perception on Vaccine Acceptance and Adoption of Risk Mitigation Strategies

被引:5
|
作者
Coker, M. O. [1 ,2 ]
Subramanian, G. [1 ]
Davidow, A. [2 ]
Fredericks-Younger, J. [1 ]
Gennaro, M. L. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fine, D. H. [1 ]
Feldman, C. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Sch Dent Med, 110 Bergen St, Newark, NJ 07101 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Sch Publ Hlth, Newark, NJ 07101 USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Publ Hlth Res Inst, Newark, NJ 07101 USA
[4] Rutgers State Univ, New Jersey Med Sch, Newark, NJ 07101 USA
关键词
COVID-19; dental offices; safety; infection control; vaccination hesitancy; Personal Protective Equipment; HEPATITIS-B VACCINE; UNITED-STATES; COVID-19; VACCINE; PREVALENCE; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1177/23800844211071111
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To estimate the association between safety perception on vaccine acceptance and adoptions of risk mitigation strategies among dental health care workers (DHCWs). Methods: A survey was emailed to DHCWs in the NewJersey area from December 2020 to January 2021. Perceived safety from regular SARS . CoV-2 testing of self,' coworkers, and patients and its association with vaccine hesitancy and risk mitigation were ascertained. Risk Mitigation Strategy (RIMS) scorns were computed from groupings of office measures: 1) physical distancing (reduced occupancy, traffic flow, donning of masks, minimal room crowding), 2) personal protective equipment (fitted for N95; donning N95 masks; use of face shields; coverings for head, body, and feet), and 3) environmental disinfection (suction, air filtration, ultraviolet, surface wiping). Results: SARS-00V-2 testing of dental professionals, coworkers, and patients were perceived to provide safety at 49%,55%, and 68%, respectively. While dentists were least likely to feel safe with regular self-testing for SARS-CoV-2 (P < 0.001) as compared with hygienists and assistants, they were more willing than hygienists (P = 0.004; odds ratio, 1.79 [95% Cl, 1.21 to 2.66]) and assistants (P < 0.001; odds ratio, 3.32 [95% CI, 1.93 to 5.711) to receive the vaccine. RIMS scores ranged from 0 to 19for 467 participants (mean [SD], 10.9 [2.91). RIMS scores did not significantly differ among groups of DHCWs; however, mean RIMS scores were higher among those who received or planned to receive the COVID-19 vaccine than those with who did not (P = 0.004). DHCWs who felt safer with regular testing had greater RIMS scores than those who did not (11.0 vs. 10.3, P = 0.01). Conclusions: Understanding IVICWs' perception of risk and safety is crucial, as it likely influences attitudes toward testing and implementation of office risk mitigation policies. Clinical studies that correlate risk perception and RIMS with SARS-CoV-2 testing are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of RiMS in dental care settings. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Educators, clinicians, and policy makers can use the results of this study when improving attitudes toward testing and implementation of risk mitigation policies within dental offices, for current and future pandemics.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 197
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Resistance or Acceptance? Mitigation Strategies in Risk Management
    Aud Solveig Nilsen
    Odd Einar Olsen
    Risk Management, 2007, 9 (4) : 255 - 270
  • [2] Impact of Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies in Oncology
    DeMartino, Jessica
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY BENEFITS, 2010, 2 (06) : 349 - 350
  • [3] The impact of climate risk valuation on the regional mitigation strategies
    Yang, Pu
    Mi, Zhifu
    Coffman, D'Maris
    Cao, Yun-Fei
    Yao, Yun-Fei
    Li, Jinkai
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 313
  • [4] Building risk mitigation strategies for circularity adoption in Indian textile supply chains
    Mishra, Ashutosh
    Soni, Gunjan
    Ramtiyal, Bharti
    Dhaundiyal, Mayank
    Kumar, Aalok
    Sarma, P. R. S.
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2023,
  • [5] Examination of risk evaluation and mitigation strategies and drug safety in the US
    Rodriguez-Monguio, Rosa
    Spielberger, Kerry
    Seoane-Vazquez, Enrique
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2014, 10 (01): : 232 - 238
  • [6] Dynamic Safety Evaluation and Risk Mitigation Strategies for Collaborative Kitting
    Lettera, Gaetano
    Bajrami, Albin
    Costa, Daniele
    Callegari, Massimo
    NEW TRENDS IN MECHANISM AND MACHINE SCIENCE, EUCOMES 2024, 2024, 165 : 286 - 293
  • [7] Acceptance rate and risk perception towards the COVID-19 vaccine in Botswana
    Tlale, Lebapotswe B.
    Gabaitiri, Lesego
    Totolo, Lorato K.
    Smith, Gomolemo
    Puswane-Katse, Orapeleng
    Ramonna, Eunice
    Mothowaeng, Basego
    Tlhakanelo, John
    Masupe, Tiny
    Rankgoane-Pono, Goabaone
    Irige, John
    Mafa, Faith
    Kolane, Samuel
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (02):
  • [8] The Impact of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Risk Perception on Adoption of Preventive Strategies in Women with a History of Gestational Diabetes
    Vu, Amanda V.
    Turk, Norman
    Duru, O. Kenrik
    Mangione, Carol
    Panchal, Hemali
    Amaya, Sarah A.
    Norris, Keith C.
    Moin, Tannaz
    DIABETES, 2020, 69
  • [9] Impact of safety climate on hazard recognition and safety risk perception
    Pandit, Bhavana
    Albert, Alex
    Patil, Yashwardhan
    Al-Bayati, Ahmed Jalil
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 113 : 44 - 53
  • [10] The impact of farmers' assessments of risk management strategies on their adoption willingness
    SHANG Yan
    XIONG Tao
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20 (12) : 3323 - 3338