Socio-technical systems integration and design: a multi-objective optimisation method based on integrative preference maximisation

被引:0
|
作者
van Heukelum, H. J. [1 ]
Binnekamp, R. [2 ]
Wolfert, A. R. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Boskalis, Corp R&D, Papendrecht, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Dept Mat Mech Management & Design, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Dept Engn Struct, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Decision support systems; design optimisation; infrastructures; multi-objective; preference function modelling; socio-technical; systems engineering; systems integration;
D O I
10.1080/15732479.2023.2297891
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Current systems design optimisation methodologies are one-sided, as these ignore the socio-technical integration between stakeholder preferences ('what a human wants') and the capability of technical assets ('what a system can deliver'). Moreover, classical multi-objective optimisation methods contain fundamental mathematical flaws. Also, the often-used classical Pareto front does not provide a single best-fit design configuration, but rather a set of design alternatives. This leaves designers without a unique solution to their problems. Finally, current multi-objective optimisation processes are not well aligned with design practices, because they do not sufficiently involve decision makers and do not translate their interests into a single common preference domain to find an overall group optimum. This paper introduces a new Open Design Systems (Odesys) methodology and a new Integrative Maximisation of Aggregated Preferences (IMAP) method, implemented in the Preferendus tool. Its added value and use are exemplified in two infrastructure design applications, which show how to achieve the pure best-fit for common-purpose design results.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-objective optimisation-based software environment for control systems design
    Joos, HD
    2002 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED CONTROL SYSTEM DESIGN PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 7 - 14
  • [2] Multi-objective design optimisation of submarine electric drive systems
    Skinner, Benjamin A.
    Palmer, Patrick R.
    Parks, Geoffrey T.
    2007 IEEE ELECTRIC SHIP TECHNOLOGIES SYMPOSIUM, 2007, : 65 - +
  • [3] A Comparison of Preference Handling Techniques in Multi-Objective Optimisation for Water Distribution Systems
    Reynoso-Meza, Gilberto
    Alves Ribeiro, Victor Henrique
    Carreno-Alvarado, Elizabeth Pauline
    WATER, 2017, 9 (12):
  • [4] Multi-objective optimisation using surrogate models for the design of VPSA systems
    Beck, Joakim
    Friedrich, Daniel
    Brandani, Stefano
    Fraga, Eric S.
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 82 : 318 - 329
  • [5] A novel method for multi-objective design optimization based on fuzzy systems
    Setayandeh, M. R.
    Babaei, A. R.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 18 (05): : 181 - 198
  • [6] Implementing a highly adaptable method for the multi-objective optimisation of energy systems
    Finke, Jonas
    Bertsch, Valentin
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 332
  • [7] Fuzzy preference-based multi-objective optimization method
    Sivakumar Ramakrishnan
    Yahya Abu Hasan
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2013, 39 : 165 - 181
  • [8] Fuzzy preference-based multi-objective optimization method
    Ramakrishnan, Sivakumar
    Abu Hasan, Yahya
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2013, 39 (02) : 165 - 181
  • [9] Formalization of multi-dimensional responsibility - Taylorism versus socio-technical systems design
    Royakkers, Lamber
    Verkerk, Maarten
    DIS 2006: IEEE WORKSHOP ON DISTRIBUTED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS: COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 309 - +
  • [10] Multi-objective optimisation of technical wind turbines parameters based on multi-physical models
    Amoretti T.
    Huet F.
    Garambois P.
    Roucoules L.
    Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal, 2022, 20 : 696 - 701