International judicial symposium on family court reform: Final report

被引:0
|
作者
Babb, Barbara A. [1 ,3 ]
Applegate, Amy G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Baltimore, Sch Law Emerita, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] IU Maurer Sch Law, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[3] Univ Baltimore, Sch Law Emerita, 1420 N Charles St, Baltimore, MA 21202 USA
关键词
family court problems; family court reform; improving family law outcomes; international judicial symposium;
D O I
10.1111/fcre.12780
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
On May 30, 2023, the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC) and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ) co-sponsored an international symposium to explore the subject of family court reform. Twenty-eight judges representing eight countries and including numerous North American states and provinces met in Los Angeles, California, to identify the most pressing challenges facing family courts and to document promising approaches to improve practice and outcomes in family court cases. They focused on domestic relations cases, as opposed to child welfare and juvenile justice matters. Prior to the symposium, participants responded to a survey about family court reform efforts in each participant's jurisdiction. Judicial officers attending the symposium represented diverse legal systems with some common and many different practices and challenges. After a day filled with small and large group discussions, participants identified key takeaways and made recommendations emanating from the day's discussions. Family court systems face tremendous challenges, including recruitment and retention of judges, high caseloads and backlog, increased numbers of self-represented litigants, heightened parent-child contact problems, many high conflict cases, and a lack of financial support to meet families' and children's needs for various services. Changes to family courts are necessary to improve outcomes for families and children and to inspire public trust and confidence in the family justice system. Eliminating the adversarial nature of family courts must be an overarching goal of family court reform. Existing judicial resources must be utilized more effectively. Efforts must be undertaken to enhance respect for the institution of the family court, including the need for cultural competence among judges and for awareness of unconscious and implicit bias. Appellate judges must have prior family law experience in order to render the most appropriate appellate decisions. Case management processes, such as early case conferencing, triage, binding settlement conferences, virtual conferences, focused hearings, chambers hearings, digitizing court processes, and hearing officers, can help alleviate some of the problems facing family courts. Family courts should use empirically validated court procedures and family law interventions, with the specific goal of helping families and children in court achieve outcomes that improve their lives as a result of family court involvement.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 289
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SYMPOSIUM ON JUDICIAL REFORM - INTRODUCTION
    DUBOIS, PL
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 1982, 10 (04) : 663 - 668
  • [2] THE FAMILY LAW EDUCATION REFORM PROJECT FINAL REPORT
    O'Connell, Mary E.
    DiFonzo, J. Herbie
    FAMILY COURT REVIEW, 2006, 44 (04) : 524 - 570
  • [3] JUDICIAL REFORM - SENATORIAL OPINION - SYMPOSIUM
    YOUNG, MR
    CURTIS, CT
    SPARKMAN, J
    PROXMIRE, W
    TOWER, JG
    STEVENS, T
    MILLER, J
    GURNEY, EJ
    MCGEE, GW
    DOLE, B
    RANDOLPH, J
    HARTKE, V
    MONDALE, WF
    TUNNEY, JV
    ALLOTT, G
    FORENSIC QUARTERLY, 1971, 45 (02): : 75 - 100
  • [4] The 2007 Judicial Reform and Court Performance in Egypt
    El Bialy, Nora
    REVIEW OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2016, 12 (01) : 95 - 117
  • [5] Court finance and floundering judicial reform in China
    Yang, Zhenjie
    Li, Linda Chelan
    CHINA INFORMATION, 2023, 37 (02) : 278 - 298
  • [6] COURT REFORM AND JUDICIAL LEADERSHIP - A THEORETICAL DISCUSSION
    WICE, PB
    JUSTICE SYSTEM JOURNAL, 1995, 17 (03) : 309 - 321
  • [7] The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Function
    Kolb, Robert
    NETHERLANDS INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW, 2016, 63 (01) : 75 - 83
  • [8] THE PLACE OF THE FAMILY COURT IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM
    POUND, R
    CRIME & DELINQUENCY, 1964, 10 (04) : 532 - 545
  • [9] Priorities for family court reform
    Gans, Louise Gruner
    COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF LAW AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 2007, 40 (04): : 629 - 635
  • [10] The High Court and Judicial Appointment Reform Comparatively Recast
    Dixon, Rosalind
    Lidbetter, John
    PUBLIC LAW REVIEW, 2023, 34 (01): : 61 - 77