Clinician Perspectives Regarding the Impact of Information Technology on Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: A National Comprehensive Cancer Network Survey

被引:0
|
作者
Arafat, Waddah [1 ]
Fu, Paul, Jr. [2 ]
Wagner, Andrew J. [3 ]
Osterman, Travis [4 ]
Martin, Daniel B. [5 ]
Sugalski, Jessica [6 ]
Heinrichs, Tricia [6 ]
Racz, Jennifer [7 ]
Tevaarwerk, Amye J. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Simmons Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[2] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Duarte, CA USA
[3] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA USA
[4] Vanderbilt Ingram Canc Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Natl Comprehens Canc Network, Plymouth Meeting, PA USA
[7] Exact Sci Corp, Madison, WI USA
[8] Mayo Clin, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Rochester, MN USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1200/CCI.23.00056
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) support high-quality cancer care. Little is known about the impact of information technology (IT) tools on the operational and technical aspects of MTBs. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network EHR Oncology Advisory Group formed a workgroup to investigate the impact of IT tools such as EHRs and virtual conferencing on MTBs. METHODS The workgroup created a cross-sectional survey for oncology clinicians (eg, pathology, medical, surgical, radiation, etc) participating in MTBs at 31 National Comprehensive Cancer Network member institutions. A standard invitation e-mail was shared with each EHR Advisory Group Member with a hyperlink to the survey, and each member distributed the survey to MTB participants at their institution or identified the appropriate person at their institution to do so. The survey was open from February 26, 2022, to April 26, 2022. Descriptive statistics were applied in the analysis of responses, and a qualitative thematic analysis of open-ended responses was completed. RESULTS Individuals from 27 institutions participated. Almost all respondents (99%, n = 764 of 767) indicated that their MTBs had participants attending virtually. Most indicated increased attendance (69%, n = 514 of 741) after virtualization with the same or improved quality of discussion (75%, n = 557 of 741) compared with in-person MTBs. Several gaps between the current and ideal state emerged regarding EHR integration: 57% (n = 433 of 758) of respondents noted the importance of adding patients for MTB presentation via the EHR, but only 40% (n = 302 of 747) reported being able to do so most of the time. Similarly, 87% (n = 661 of 760) indicated the importance of documenting recommendations in the EHR, but only 53% (n = 394 of 746) reported this occurring routinely. CONCLUSION Major gaps include the lack of EHR integration for MTBs. Clinical workflows and EHR functionalities could be improved to further optimize EHRs for MTB management and documentation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinician Perspectives Regarding the Impact of Information Technology on Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: A National Comprehensive Cancer Network Survey
    Arafat, Waddah
    Fu Jr, Paul
    Wagner, Andrew J.
    Osterman, Travis
    Martin, Daniel B.
    Sugalski, Jessica
    Heinrichs, Tricia
    Racz, Jennifer
    Tevaarwerk, Amye J.
    [J]. JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2023, 7
  • [2] Oncologist Perspectives on Telemedicine for Patients With Cancer: A National Comprehensive Cancer Network Survey
    Tevaarwerk, Amye J.
    Chandereng, Thevaa
    Osterman, Travis
    Arafat, Waddah
    Smerage, Jeffrey
    Polubriaginof, Fernanda C. G.
    Heinrichs, Tricia
    Sugalski, Jessica
    Martin, Daniel B.
    [J]. JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 17 (09) : 572 - +
  • [3] Impact of multidisciplinary tumor boards on diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer
    Bumm, R.
    Feith, M.
    Lordick, F.
    Herschbach, P.
    Siewert, J. R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SURGERY-ACTA CHIRURGICA AUSTRIACA, 2007, 39 (03): : 136 - 140
  • [4] Impact of multidisciplinary tumor boards on clinical management of cancer patients
    Specchia, M. L.
    Frisicale, E. M.
    Cacciatore, P.
    Scattaglia, M.
    Carini, E.
    Pezzullo, A.
    Ricciardi, W.
    Damiani, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 28 : 393 - 394
  • [5] Impact of multidisciplinary tumor boards on patients with rectal cancer (Review)
    Ioannidis, Argyrios
    Konstantinidis, Michael
    Apostolakis, Sotirios
    Koutserimpas, Christos
    Machairas, Nikolaos
    Konstantinidis, Konstantinos M.
    [J]. MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 9 (02) : 135 - 137
  • [6] Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards: Facts and Satisfaction Analysis of an Indispensable Comprehensive Cancer Center Instrument
    Engelhardt, Monika
    Selder, Ricarda
    Pandurevic, Masa
    Moeller, Mandy
    Ihorst, Gabriele
    Waldschmidt, Johannes
    Herget, Georg
    Waesch, Ralph
    [J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2017, 142 (09) : E51 - E60
  • [7] IMPACT OF A NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK COMPLIANT MULTIDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE ON TREATMENT DECISIONS IN PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Hussein, Ahmed
    Samoni, Adeena
    Weber, Jesslyn
    Elsayed, Ahmed
    Khan, Amir
    Ramahi, Yousuf
    Smith, Semiah
    Toner, Zachary
    Kauffman, Eric
    Sullivan, Brian
    Kuettel, Michael
    Mohler, James
    Guru, Khurshid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1198 - E1198
  • [8] The impact of Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards on breast cancer care: results of a systematic review
    Castrini, F.
    Specchia, M. L.
    Spina, F.
    Carini, E.
    Di Pilla, A.
    Grieco, A.
    Frisicale, E.
    Ricciardi, W.
    Damiani, G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30
  • [9] Nationwide Survey of Patients' Perspectives Regarding Their Radiation and Multidisciplinary Cancer Treatment Experiences
    Shaverdian, Narek
    Yeboa, Debra N.
    Gardner, Liz
    Harari, Paul M.
    Liao, Kaiping
    McCloskey, Susan
    Tuli, Richard
    Vapiwala, Neha
    Jagsi, Reshma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2019, 15 (12) : 654 - +
  • [10] THE IMPACT OF A NATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY TUMOR BOARD FOR CANCER DURING PREGNANCY
    Heimovaara, J.
    Boere, I. A.
    De Haan, J.
    Van Calsteren, K.
    Amant, F.
    Van Zuylen, L.
    Lok, C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 : A144 - A145