System Identification of Enterprise Innovation Factor Combinations-A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis Method

被引:1
|
作者
Dou, Zixin [1 ]
Sun, Yanming [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Management, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
来源
SYSTEMS | 2024年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
system identification; corporate governance; institutional pressure; enterprise innovation; fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis; INCENTIVES; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.3390/systems12020053
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
High-tech manufacturing enterprises, as innovative entities, are a key focus of national attention. Currently, such enterprises are facing both internal governance pressure and external institutional pressure. Unlike traditional studies that mostly use regression equations, this article uses the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis method to examine how high-tech manufacturing enterprises can coordinate their internal governance mechanisms and external institutional pressures to achieve optimal innovation. This improves the complex mechanism of the multiple factors jointly explaining corporate innovation, and also helps to elucidate the nonlinear relationship between internal governance factors, external institutional factors, and corporate innovation, effectively enriching research methods and results. However, there has not been any research on the issue of enterprise innovation from the perspective of coordinating the two, which urgently needs to be addressed. This article examines how high-tech manufacturing enterprises can reconcile their internal governance mechanisms with external institutional pressures to achieve optimal innovation. The results showed that (1) a single factor cannot constitute the necessary conditions for innovation in high-tech manufacturing enterprises, but executive and shareholder governance have universality in the innovation in high-tech manufacturing enterprises; (2) in the absence of political advantages, high-tech manufacturing enterprises should focus on the coordinated development of internal governance, making board, executive, and shareholder governance the core conditions for innovative development; (3) with political advantages as the main focus and market attention as a supplement, high-tech manufacturing enterprises promote innovative development by combining executive and shareholder governance. This finding indicates a significant substitution effect between government legitimacy and board governance, and confirms that the importance of obtaining government legitimacy for high-tech manufacturing innovation is higher than market legitimacy. This article enriches the research on enterprise innovation by linking internal corporate governance with external institutional pressure, expands the research on the coordination relationship between institutional pressure and corporate governance, and has enlightening significance in revealing the collaborative path for innovation in high-tech manufacturing enterprises.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method
    Sascha Kraus
    Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano
    Miriam Schüssler
    [J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2018, 14 : 15 - 33
  • [2] Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research - the rise of a method
    Kraus, Sascha
    Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo
    Schussler, Miriam
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 14 (01) : 15 - 33
  • [3] Innovation performance and the role of clustering at the local enterprise level: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis approach
    Pickernell, David
    Jones, Paul
    Beynon, Malcolm J.
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 31 (1-2): : 82 - 103
  • [4] Using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
    Lee, Sophia Seung-yoon
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH, 2014, 36
  • [5] Identifying the configurational paths to innovation in SMEs: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
    Poorkavoos, Meysam
    Duan, Yanqing
    Edwards, John S.
    Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 (12) : 5843 - 5854
  • [6] Research on Innovation Capability of Regional Innovation System Based on Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Evidence from China
    Huang, Zhenyu
    [J]. SYSTEMS, 2022, 10 (06):
  • [7] Prerequisites for the Innovation Performance of Artificial Intelligence Laboratory: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis
    Shi, Jincheng
    Wang, Yingchun
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 71 : 5341 - 5356
  • [8] A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Publications on the Fuzzy Sets Theory
    Castello-Sirvent, Fernando
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (08)
  • [9] Key account managers' identification profiles and effectiveness: A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
    Peters, Leonore
    Ivens, Bjoern Sven
    Pardo, Catherine
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 107 : 253 - 265
  • [10] Knowledge, innovation, and outcomes in craft beer: Theoretical framework and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
    Cabrera-Flores, Mayer R.
    Peris-Ortiz, Marta
    Leon-Pozo, Alicia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 38 (05) : 5369 - 5378