Assessment of a Decision-Making Model for Monitoring the Success of a Project for Smart Buildings

被引:4
|
作者
Amhaimedi, Serag [1 ]
Naimi, Sepanta [1 ]
Alsallami, Sura [1 ]
机构
[1] Altinbas Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN | 2023年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
Intelligent Building; Multi-Criteria Decision Maker; MCDM; MATLAB Code; CONSTRUCTION; BIM; MANAGEMENT; MCDM;
D O I
10.28991/CEJ-2023-09-01-010
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Objective: To express the usage of intelligent concepts in the architectural building construction field that are primarily concerned with reducing building energy use. Improved energy-saving methods and the use of environmentally friendly design principles are essential in this field. This type of managerial decision-making is necessary for the success of these types of projects. Methods: monitoring the performance of intelligent buildings use the cost variance (CV) and schedule variation as standard metrics to track the progress of a project based on the save energy concept. Also, this research conducted a comparative study on Building Information Modelling (BIM) and (MCDM) decision-making limitations as presented in the article. Analysis: the conventional technique, on the other hand, is unable to offer data on variance from typical performance levels. The main point based on Delphi results of construction cost variables has been observed 19 effective factors. Finding and Novelty: The RII observed that the most effective aspects of an intelligent building are the number of floors in the building, the kind of structural design, and the size of the shadow cast on the surface of the building. The Multi-Criteria Decision Maker (MCDM) observed significant differences in planned value (PV) and actual value (AC) results. In addition, as a result of the current approach, it is possible to track project costs and timelines more precisely.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 142
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ASSESSMENT OF PROJECT SUCCESS RELATED TO THE TRIPLE CONSTRAINTS APPROACH IN MANAGERIAL DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES
    Louters, Exley
    Edoun, E. Innocents
    GLOBAL AND NATIONAL BUSINESS THEORIES AND PRACTICE: BRIDGING THE PAST WITH THE FUTURE, 2017, : 873 - 890
  • [2] DevOps project management success factors: A decision-making framework
    Akbar, Muhammad Azeem
    Khan, Arif Ali
    Islam, Najmul
    Mahmood, Sajjad
    SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2024, 54 (02): : 257 - 280
  • [3] BOT for Green Buildings: a Decision-making Model for Government
    Wu, Di
    Wang, Shouqing
    Hu, Yishi
    Liu, Ting
    FRONTIERS OF GREEN BUILDING, MATERIALS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING III, PTS 1-3, 2013, 368-370 : 1148 - 1153
  • [4] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AS A PROJECT DECISION-MAKING TOOL
    Quintana, A.
    Guillen-Guillamon, I
    REACTIVE PROACTIVE ARCHITECTURE, 2018, : 244 - 248
  • [5] A Decision-Making Model for Predicting Technology Adoption Success
    Tahriri, Farzad
    Mousavi, Maryam
    Galavi, Hadi
    Sorooshian, Shahryar
    PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (11)
  • [6] Noise Monitoring Networks as Tools for Smart City Decision-Making
    Sanchez-Sanchez, Rafael
    Carlos Fortes-Garrido, Juan
    Pedro Bolivar, Juan
    ARCHIVES OF ACOUSTICS, 2018, 43 (01) : 103 - 112
  • [7] Decision-making and firm success
    Ireland, RD
    Miller, CC
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2004, 18 (04): : 8 - 12
  • [8] Artificial Intelligence Project Success Factors: Moral Decision-Making with Algorithms
    Miller, Gloria J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 16TH CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS), 2021, : 379 - 390
  • [9] The role of big data analytics and decision-making in achieving project success
    Ahmed, Riaz
    Shaheen, Sumayya
    Philbin, Simon P.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2022, 65
  • [10] Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners
    Lill, Jordan D.
    Shriver, Mark D.
    Allen, Keith D.
    BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IN PRACTICE, 2021, 14 (04) : 1144 - 1156