Real-World Biomarker Testing Patterns in Patients With Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in a US Community-Based Oncology Practice Setting

被引:4
|
作者
Sireci, Anthony N. [1 ,5 ]
Krein, Peter M. [1 ]
Hess, Lisa M. [2 ]
Khan, Taha [2 ]
Willey, Joanne [3 ]
Ayars, Michael [4 ]
Deyoung, Kathryn [3 ]
Bhaskar, Sandhya [4 ]
Mumuney, Ganiat [4 ]
Coutinho, Anna [3 ]
机构
[1] Loxo Lilly, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Xcenda, Carrollton, TX USA
[4] IntrinsiQ, Carrollton, TX USA
[5] Lilly Corporate Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
Community oncology practice; Real-world data; NGS; Treatment guidelines; Diagnostic testing; ASSOCIATION; GUIDELINES; ADHERENCE; SELECTION; COLLEGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cllc.2023.03.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
This real-world chart review study observed increases in biomarker testing after both targeted drug approvals and after inclusion in national treatment guidelines. Despite these improvements, approximately 10% of patients never received any biomarker testing, and more than one third of patients with positive biomarker tests do not receive targeted therapy. Further work is needed to understand barriers in patient care Introduction/Background: This study was designed to descr ibe real-wor ld changes in biomarker testing among patients with non-squamous, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) in a community oncology setting from 2015 to 2020. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study randomly selected 500 adult patients diagnosed with nonsquamous mNSCLC to undergo chart review and data extraction. Data were extracted and validated by 2 independent abstractors. Biomarker testing rates were described before and after national guideline updates and FDA approval of targeted agents. Results: At least 1 biomarker test was received by 89.4% of patients with mNSCLC. Of all patients, 46.6%, 34.6%, and 8.2% received both single-gene and next generation sequencing (NGS)-based testing, single-gene testing only, and NGS-based testing only, respectively. However, there were changes in testing rates at the time of drug approvals for targeted agents. Biomarker testing increased for ALK (45.0% before to 78.3% after ALK-targeted drug approval), BRAF (from 20.0% to 67.8%), EGFR (from 20.0% to 78.2%), NTRK (from 34.6% to 55.7%), and ROS1 (increased from 29.6% before approval to 74.2% after). Biomarker testing increased after changes were made to national guidelines for BRAF (from 18.8% before to 68.1% after inclusion in guidelines), NTRK (from 37.2% to 56.5%), and ROS1 (increased from 40.8% to 74.5% after guideline updates). Targeted therapy was received by 62.4% of patients with a positive biomarker. Conclusion: Increases in biomarker testing rates were observed relative to targeted agent approvals and national guideline updates. However, many patients with non-squamous mNSCLC did not receive full genotyping in accordance with national guidelines and represent an opportunity to identify reasons and solutions for barriers to care.Clinical Lung Cancer, Vol. 24, No. 5, 429-436 & COPY; 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 436
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] REAL-WORLD PATTERNS OF BIOMARKER TESTING IN METASTATIC NON-SQUAMOUS NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
    Roncadori, A.
    Massa, I
    Balzi, W.
    Danesi, V
    Rengucci, C.
    Gentili, N.
    Crino, L.
    Delmonte, A.
    Altini, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (01) : S255 - S255
  • [2] Biomarker testing patterns in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in US community-based oncology practice setting
    Sireci, Anthony
    Krein, Peter M.
    Hess, Lisa M.
    Khan, Taha
    Willey, Joanne P.
    Ayars, Michael
    Deyoung, Kathryn
    Bhaskhar, Sandya
    Mumuney, Ganiat
    Coutinho, Anna D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (28)
  • [3] Real-world patterns of biomarker testing and targeted therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) in the community oncology setting.
    Nadler, Eric S.
    Vasudevan, Anupama
    Davies, Kalatu
    Wang, Yunfei
    Gupta, Ravindra
    Ogale, Sarika
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [4] Real-world biomarker testing trends in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Clinton, Natasha
    Patel, Manish R.
    Ayars, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16) : E18728 - E18728
  • [5] Biomarker Testing for Patients with Advanced/Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in Academic and Community-Based Practices in the United States (US)
    Hess, L.
    Zhu, Y.
    Han, Y.
    Van Hook, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 22 (11): : S78 - S78
  • [6] REAL-WORLD TREATMENT PATTERNS IN STAGE IV NON-SQUAMOUS NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER IN ARGENTINA
    Novick, D.
    Hong, J.
    Sheffield, K. M.
    Mills, B. J.
    Gallino, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A881 - A881
  • [7] Real-world BRAF testing patterns for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), metastatic melanoma, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Edwards, Michelle L.
    Levin, Rebecca
    Abraham, Anup
    Amari, Diana T.
    Kelton, John M.
    Vieira, Maria Cecilia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [8] Testing patterns and outcomes of different EGFR-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in a Canadian real-world setting
    Boyne, D. J.
    Jarada, T.
    Yusuf, A.
    O'Sullivan, D. E.
    Hu, L. X. Y.
    Brenner, D. R.
    Abbie, E.
    Rose, J. B.
    Eaton, K.
    Ewara, E. M.
    Cheung, W. Y.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : S56 - S56
  • [9] Real-world treatment patterns and costs in a US Medicare population with metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer
    Davis, Keith L.
    Goyal, Ravi K.
    Able, Stephen L.
    Brown, Jacqueline
    Li, Li
    Kaye, James A.
    [J]. LUNG CANCER, 2015, 87 (02) : 176 - 185
  • [10] Maintenance chemotherapy in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
    Belalcazar, A.
    Santos, E. S.
    Gomez, J. E.
    Lopez, E.
    Raez, L. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)