Nursing students' critical thinking and associated factors in Vietnam: A multicenter cross-sectional study

被引:3
|
作者
V. Nguyen, Trung [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Mei-Fen [3 ,4 ]
Kuo, Shu-Yu [2 ]
Hu, Sophia H. [5 ]
Ngoc, Thanh D. T. [6 ]
Chuang, Yeu-Hui [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Tra Vinh Univ, Ward 5, Fac Med, Nursing Dept, 126 Nguyen Thien Thanh St, Tra Vinh 87000, Vietnam
[2] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Nursing, Sch Nursing, 250 Wu Xing St, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Med Univ, Wan Fang Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, 111 Xinglong Rd,Sect 3, Taipei 11696, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Med Univ, Wan Fang Hosp, Res Ctr Nursing Clin Practice, 111 Xinglong Rd,Sect 3, Taipei 11696, Taiwan
[5] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Coll Nursing, Dept Nursing, 155 Linong St,Sect 2, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[6] Pham Ngoc Thach Univ Med, Fac Nursing & Med Technol, 2 Duong Quang Trung St,Dist 10, Ho Chi Minh City 72713, Vietnam
关键词
Critical thinking; Thinking skills; Nursing students; VALIDATION; DISPOSITION; STRATEGIES; EDUCATION; NURSES; SKILLS; IRAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103823
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the critical thinking abilities of senior nursing students in Vietnam and determine factors associated with their critical thinking disposition and skills.Background: Assessing critical thinking competence is crucial for determining senior nursing students' preparedness for entering the healthcare workforce and can be used to examine current nursing education's ability to cultivate nursing students' critical thinking. However, little research was found on critical thinking among Vietnamese nursing students.Design: A multicenter cross-sectional research design.Methods: A convenience sample of 533 senior nursing students from six universities in Vietnam participated in this study. All participants completed the online questionnaires, including basic information, a subscale of the Motivated Strategy for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), Critical Thinking Disposition Scale (CTDS), and Critical Thinking Self-Assessment Scale (CTSAS).Results: The mean score for the CTDS was 42.81 (standard deviation (SD) = 5.29), while the mean score for the CTSAS was 168.29 (SD = 44.43). Results of the multiple linear-regression analysis showed that an increase in self-study hours per day (B = 0.41, p = 0.007), higher self-efficacy in learning and performance (B = 0.26, p < 0.001), and a more-supportive environment (B = 0.97, p < 0.001) were predictors of critical thinking disposition. Moreover, an increase in self-study hours per day (B = 4.09, p = 0.001), higher self-efficacy in learning and performance (B = 2.65, p < 0.001), a more-supportive environment (B = 7.74, p < 0.001), and more experience with research (B = 7.03, p = 0.03) were predictors of critical thinking skills.Conclusions: This study revealed that senior nursing students in Vietnam possess a moderate level of critical thinking abilities. Those students who dedicate more hours to self-study, demonstrate higher self-efficacy in learning and performance, experience a supportive environment, and engage in more research activities exhibit better critical thinking disposition and skills. The findings highlight the ongoing need to enhance critical thinking disposition and skills of nursing students in Vietnam. It is suggested that nursing faculty members should develop the appropriate strategies to improve nursing students' critical thinking disposition and skills.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Cross-Sectional Study Examining Factors Related to Critical Thinking in Nursing
    Lang, Gary Morris
    Beach, Nick Lee
    Patrician, Patricia A.
    Martin, Cheryl
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR NURSES IN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 29 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [2] Factors influencing critical thinking skills among nursing students: Reports from a cross-sectional study
    Sacgaca, Lailani
    Dagdagui, Rolly
    Alrashedi, Nojood
    Buta, Joyce
    Maestrado, Richard
    Villareal, Sandro
    Alshammari, Salman Amish
    Alrashedi, Maha Sanat
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2022, 9 (11): : 93 - 98
  • [3] Brazilian undergraduate nursing students' critical thinking need to be increased: a cross-sectional study
    Nes, Andrea Aparecida Goncalves
    Riegel, Fernando
    Martini, Jussara Gue
    Zlamal, Jaroslav
    Bresolin, Paula
    Mohallem, Andrea Gomes da Costa
    Steindal, Simen Alexander
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2023, 76 (01)
  • [4] Happiness among university students and associated factors: A cross-sectional study in Vietnam
    Nam, Pham Tien
    Tung, Pham Thanh
    Linh, Bui Phuong
    Dung, Nguyen Hanh
    Minh, Hoang Van
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (03)
  • [5] Factors associated with the critical thinking ability of professional nurses: A cross-sectional study
    Nguyen, Tuan Van
    Liu, Hsueh-Erh
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2021, 8 (04): : 1970 - 1980
  • [6] Levels of Nursing Students' Exposure to Colleague Violence and Affecting Factors: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
    Gungor, Serap
    Tosunoz, Ipek kose
    [J]. MEDICINA DEL LAVORO, 2024, 115 (04):
  • [7] Nursing Students' Attitudes Toward Technology: Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
    Dallora, Ana Luiza
    Andersson, Ewa Kazimiera
    Palm, Bruna Gregory
    Bohman, Doris
    Bjorling, Gunilla
    Marcinowicz, Ludmila
    Stjernberg, Louise
    Anderberg, Peter
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 10
  • [8] Insomnia in nursing students and related factors: A cross-sectional study
    Gunes, Zeynep
    Arslantas, Hulya
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2017, 23 (05)
  • [9] Senior nursing students' ageism and its associated factors: A national cross-sectional study
    Wang, Chih-Yu
    Huang, Pei-Jing
    Chuang, Yeu-Hui
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2024, 141
  • [10] Critical Thinking and Digital Competence in College Students: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Oliva, Herberth Alexander
    Perez-Moran, Graciela
    Epifania-Huerta, Andres
    Temoche-Palacios, Liliana
    lparraguirre-Villanueva, Orlando
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING PEDAGOGY, 2024, 14 (02): : 92 - 99