Secondary formation and influencing factors of WSOC in PM2.5 over Urumqi, NW China

被引:7
|
作者
Zhang, Xiaohui [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xiaoxiao [1 ,2 ]
Talifu, Dilinuer [1 ,2 ]
Ding, Xiang [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Xinming [3 ,4 ]
Abulizi, Abulikemu [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Qilong [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Bowen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xinjiang Univ, Sch Chem Engn & Technol, State Key Lab Chem & Utilizat Carbon Based Energy, Urumqi 830017, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Univ, Coll Chem Engn, Xinjiang Key Lab Coal Clean Convers & Chem Engn, Urumqi 830017, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Guangzhou Inst Geochem, State Key Lab Organ Geochem, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
[4] Guangdong Hong Kong Macao Joint Lab Environm Poll, Guangzhou 510640, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PM2; 5; WSOC; LWC; Acidity; Urumqi; SOLUBLE ORGANIC-CARBON; AEROSOL FORMATION; CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS; ATMOSPHERIC PARTICLES; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; COARSE PARTICLES; ACIDITY; WINTER; HETEROGENEITY; DROPLETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119450
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Exploring the secondary formation of water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) and its influencing factors is critical to understand the impact of WSOC on climate change and air quality. In this study, PM2.5 samples were collected from Sep.2017 to Aug.2018 in Urumqi, Northwest China. These samples were analyzed for WSOC, organic and element carbon (OC, EC), and water-soluble ions. The levels of WSOC ranged from 0.57 to 19.7 mu g C/m3 with an annual mean of 6.08 +/- 3.50 mu g C/m3, accounting for 53% of OC. The observed ratios of WSOC to OC (0.35-0.77) were within the range of those for biomass burning and secondary organic aerosol (SOA). In addition, WSOC was positively correlated with the biomass burning tracer (K+) and secondary species (sulfate, nitrate, and ammo-nium). All of these observational evidences indicated that atmospheric WSOC over Urumqi were mainly from biomass burning and SOA. Based on a K-tracer approach, we estimated WSOC from biomass burning (WSOCBB) and SOA (WSOCsec). Our results suggested that WSOCsec was dominated over WSOCBB in four seasons with the highest level in winter (8.22 +/- 3.82 mu g C/m3) and the lowest in summer (2.91 +/- 1.63 mu g C/m3). The WSOCsec concentrations and WSOCsec fractions in OC were high under the conditions of high relative humidity, low temperature and wind speed. WSOCsec was positively correlated with liquid water content (LWC) but exhibited no dependence on aerosol acidity (in-situ pH). This indicated that the heterogeneous formation of WSOCsec in the air of Urumqi was largely associated with LWC rather than acidity.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Factors Influencing PM2.5 Value
    Xu, Jiannan
    [J]. 2017 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND SPORTS EDUCATION (ESE 2017), VOL 2, 2017, 75 : 453 - 457
  • [2] Seasonal changes of carbonaceous speeies in PM2.5, PM2.5~10 in Urumqi
    Wang, Guo
    Dilnur, Talip
    Mailikezhati, Maihemuti
    Abulikemu, Abulizi
    Wang, Xin-Ming
    Ding, Xiang
    [J]. Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2016, 36 (02): : 356 - 362
  • [3] The socioeconomic factors influencing the PM2.5 levels of 160 cities in China
    Li, Wenli
    Yang, Guangfei
    Qian, Xiangyu
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 84
  • [4] Spatiotemporal variations and influencing factors of PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing, China
    Zhang, Licheng
    An, Ji
    Liu, Mengyang
    Li, Zhiwei
    Liu, Yue
    Tao, Lixin
    Liu, Xiangtong
    Zhang, Feng
    Zheng, Deqiang
    Gao, Qi
    Guo, Xiuhua
    Luo, Yanxia
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2020, 262
  • [5] Exploring PM2.5 Environmental Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors in China
    Ma, Dongdong
    Li, Guifang
    He, Feng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (22)
  • [6] Infiltration of outdoor PM2.5 and influencing factors
    Zahed, Fatemeh
    Pardakhti, Alireza
    Motlagh, Majid Shafiepour
    Kari, Behrouz Mohammad
    Tavakoli, Azadeh
    [J]. AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2022, 15 (12): : 2215 - 2230
  • [7] Infiltration of outdoor PM2.5 and influencing factors
    Fatemeh Zahed
    Alireza Pardakhti
    Majid Shafiepour Motlagh
    Behrouz Mohammad Kari
    Azadeh Tavakoli
    [J]. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2022, 15 : 2215 - 2230
  • [8] Autumn and Wintertime Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in PM2.5 and PM2.5-10 from Urumqi, China
    Limu, Yi Li Mire A. Bu Da
    Lifu, Di Li Nuer Ta
    Miti, A. Bu Lizi Yi
    Wang, Xinming
    Ding, Xiang
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2013, 13 (01) : 407 - 414
  • [9] PM2.5 Concentration Influencing Factors in China Based on the Random Forest Model
    Xia, Xiao-Sheng
    Chen, Jing-Jing
    Wang, Jia-Jia
    Cheng, Xian-Fu
    [J]. Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2020, 41 (05): : 2057 - 2065
  • [10] Spatial patterns of the diurnal variations of PM2.5 and their influencing factors across China
    Liu, Junli
    Wang, Siyuan
    Zhu, Kemin
    Hu, Jinghao
    Li, Runkui
    Song, Xianfeng
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 318