Differences in Biofilm Formation by Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Strains

被引:7
|
作者
Hernandez-Cuellar, Eduardo [1 ]
Tsuchiya, Kohsuke [2 ]
Valle-Rios, Ricardo [3 ,4 ]
Medina-Contreras, Oscar [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Aguascalientes, Dept Morfol, Lab Biol Celular & Tisular, Aguascalientes 20100, Mexico
[2] Kanazawa Univ, Canc Res Inst, Div Immunol & Mol Biol, Kakuma Machi, Kanazawa 9201192, Japan
[3] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Med, Res Div, Mexico City 04360, Mexico
[4] Federico Gomez Childrens Hosp Mexico, Lab Res Immunol & Prote, Mexico City 06720, Mexico
[5] Mexico Childrens Hosp HIMFG, Epidemiol Endocrinol & Nutr Res Unit, Mexico City 06720, Mexico
关键词
MRSA; MSSA; biofilms; PIA (polysaccharide intercellular adhesin); icaADBC operon; Agr; SarA; FIBRONECTIN-BINDING PROTEINS; ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; METICILLIN-RESISTANT; GENE-EXPRESSION; SARA; AGR; POLYSACCHARIDE; SIGMA(B); LOCUS;
D O I
10.3390/diseases11040160
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a common pathogen involved in community- and hospital-acquired infections. Its biofilm formation ability predisposes it to device-related infections. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains are associated with more serious infections and higher mortality rates and are more complex in terms of antibiotic resistance. It is still controversial whether MRSA are indeed more virulent than methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains. A difference in biofilm formation by both types of bacteria has been suggested, but how only the presence of the SCCmec cassette or mecA influences this phenotype remains unclear. In this review, we have searched for literature studying the difference in biofilm formation by MRSA and MSSA. We highlighted the relevance of the icaADBC operon in the PIA-dependent biofilms generated by MSSA under osmotic stress conditions, and the role of extracellular DNA and surface proteins in the PIA-independent biofilms generated by MRSA. We described the prominent role of surface proteins with the LPXTG motif and hydrolases for the release of extracellular DNA in the MRSA biofilm formation. Finally, we explained the main regulatory systems in S. aureus involved in virulence and biofilm formation, such as the SarA and Agr systems. As most of the studies were in vitro using inert surfaces, it will be necessary in the future to focus on biofilm formation on extracellular matrix components and its relevance in the pathogenesis of infection by both types of strains using in vivo animal models.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DNA POLYMORPHISMS IN METHICILLIN-SUSCEPTIBLE AND METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STRAINS OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS
    CARLESNURIT, MJ
    CHRISTOPHLE, B
    BROCHE, S
    GOUBY, A
    BOUZIGES, N
    RAMUZ, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (08) : 2092 - 2096
  • [2] Prevalence of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in the community
    Shopsin, B
    Mathema, B
    Martinez, J
    Ha, E
    Campo, ML
    Fierman, A
    Krasinski, K
    Kornblum, J
    Alcabes, P
    Waddington, M
    Riehman, M
    Kreiswirth, BN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 182 (01): : 359 - 362
  • [3] Salt tolerance of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus
    Bruins, Marjan J.
    Juffer, Petra
    Wolfhagen, Maurice J. H. M.
    Ruijs, Gijs J. H. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 45 (02) : 682 - 683
  • [4] AUTOLYSIS OF METHICILLIN-RESISTANT AND METHICILLIN-SUSCEPTIBLE STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS
    GUSTAFSON, JE
    BERGERBACHI, B
    STRASSLE, A
    WILKINSON, BJ
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1992, 36 (03) : 566 - 572
  • [5] Is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus replacing methicillin-susceptible S. aureus?
    Mostofsky, Elizabeth
    Lipsitch, Marc
    Regev-Yochay, Gili
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2011, 66 (10) : 2199 - 2214
  • [6] Environmental regulation of biofilm development in methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates
    Fitzpatrick, F
    Humphreys, H
    O'Gara, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2006, 62 (01) : 120 - 122
  • [7] Nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia among nasal carriers of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible strains
    Pujol, M
    Pena, C
    Pallares, R
    Ariza, J
    Ayats, J
    Dominguez, MA
    Gudiol, F
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 100 (05): : 509 - 516
  • [8] Are methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus carriers protected from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections?
    Regev-Yochay, G.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2019, 25 (01) : 4 - 5
  • [9] Clinical and prognostic differences between methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis
    Hidalgo-Tenorio, Carmen
    Galvez, Juan
    Martinez-Marcos, Francisco Javier
    Plata-Ciezar, Antonio
    De La Torre-Lima, Javier
    Eduardo Lopez-Cortes, Luis
    Noureddine, Mariam
    Reguera, Jose M.
    Vinuesa, David
    Victoria Garcia, Maria
    Ojeda, Guillermo
    Luque, Rafael
    Manuel Lomas, Jose
    Antonio Lepe, Jose
    de Alarcon, Aristides
    [J]. BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [10] Clinical and prognostic differences between methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis
    Carmen Hidalgo-Tenorio
    Juan Gálvez
    Francisco Javier Martínez-Marcos
    Antonio Plata-Ciezar
    Javier De La Torre-Lima
    Luis Eduardo López-Cortés
    Mariam Noureddine
    José M. Reguera
    David Vinuesa
    Maria Victoria García
    Guillermo Ojeda
    Rafael Luque
    José Manuel Lomas
    Jose Antonio Lepe
    Arístides de Alarcón
    [J]. BMC Infectious Diseases, 20