Blockchain and Smart Contracts for Telecommunications: Requirements vs. Cost Analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Afraz, Nima [1 ]
Wilhelmi, Francesc [2 ]
Ahmadi, Hamed [3 ]
Ruffini, Marco [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, CONNECT Ctr, Sch Comp Sci, Dublin 4, Ireland
[2] Nokia Bell Labs, Radio Syst Res, D-70435 Stuttgart, Germany
[3] Univ York, Sch Phys Engn & Technol, York YO10 5DD, England
[4] Trinity Coll Dublin, CONNECT Ctr, Sch Comp Sci & Stat, Dublin 2, Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
5G network slicing; blockchain for telecom; blockchained federated learning; blockchain scalability; cloud-native distributed ledger; cost analysis; permissioned blockchain; smart contracts; 5G;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3309423
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Blockchain technology offers solutions to numerous network problems by leveraging distributed record-keeping and collaborative decision-making features. However, deployment considerations such as blockchain infrastructure cost, performance requirements, and scalability are often overlooked. This paper provides an in-depth perspective on deploying blockchain-based solutions for telecommunications networks, estimating costs, comparing infrastructure options (on-premises, IaaS, BaaS), and choosing a suitable blockchain platform. To that end, we identify the performance limitations of the proposed solution under various deployment infrastructures by studying two prominent use cases: one proposing a distributed marketplace solution for 5G slice brokering and another one on the decentralization of federated learning (FL) through blockchain. For the slice brokering use case, our experiments showed that sub-second latency could be achieved for a maximum transaction throughput in the range of 10 to 200 transactions per second (TPS), whereas use cases requiring a higher throughput (300 to 400 TPS) would need more computational resources. Meanwhile, the FL use case provided insights into the achievable accuracy of distributed learning under various blockchain settings (public, consortium, and private), which led to the understanding that private and consortium blockchains can achieve acceptable accuracy in significantly lower training times compared to public blockchains.
引用
收藏
页码:95653 / 95666
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HRM smart contracts on the blockchain: emulated vs native
    Neiheiser, Ray
    Inacio, Gustavo
    Rech, Luciana
    Fraga, Joni
    CLUSTER COMPUTING-THE JOURNAL OF NETWORKS SOFTWARE TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 23 (03): : 2105 - 2122
  • [2] HRM smart contracts on the blockchain: emulated vs native
    Ray Neiheiser
    Gustavo Inácio
    Luciana Rech
    Joni Fraga
    Cluster Computing, 2020, 23 : 2105 - 2122
  • [3] Blockchain and Smart Contracts
    Abdelhamid, Manar
    Hassan, Ghada
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2019 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE AND INFORMATION ENGINEERING (ICSIE 2019), 2019, : 91 - 95
  • [4] Analysis of Blockchain Smart Contracts: Techniques and Insights
    Kim, Shinhae
    Ryu, Sukyoung
    2020 IEEE SECURE DEVELOPMENT (SECDEV 2020), 2020, : 65 - 73
  • [5] Smart contracts on the blockchain - A bibliometric analysis and review
    Ante, Lennart
    TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2021, 57
  • [6] A Cost Analysis of Internet of Things Sensor Data Storage on Blockchain via Smart Contracts
    Peker, Yesem Kurt
    Rodriguez, Xavier
    Ericsson, James
    Lee, Suk Jin
    Perez, Alfredo J.
    ELECTRONICS, 2020, 9 (02)
  • [7] ExplanaSC: A Framework for Determining Information Requirements for Explainable Blockchain Smart Contracts
    Al Ghanmi, Hanouf
    Bahsoon, Rami
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2024, 50 (08) : 1984 - 2004
  • [8] Smart contracts vs incomplete contracts: A transaction cost economics viewpoint
    Vatiero, Massimiliano
    COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 2022, 46
  • [9] Intelligent contracts: Making smart contracts smart for blockchain intelligence
    Ouyang, Liwei
    Zhang, Wenwen
    Wang, Fei-Yue
    COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 104
  • [10] Performance Analysis of Blockchain Networks through Smart Contracts
    Pflanzner, Tamas
    Bodnar, Peter Lajos
    Kertesz, Attila
    2022 IEEE 8TH WORLD FORUM ON INTERNET OF THINGS, WF-IOT, 2022,