Scholarly rumors: Citation analysis of vast misinformation regarding parental alienation theory

被引:4
|
作者
Bernet, William [1 ,3 ]
Xu, Shenmeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Nashville, TN USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Jean & Alexander Heard Lib, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, 1313 Twenty-First Ave South, 209 Oxford House, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
citation analysis; disinformation; misinformation; parental alienation theory; retraction; CHILDREN; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1002/bsl.2605
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Misinformation is widespread in political discourse, mental health literature, and hard science. This article describes recurrent publication of the same misinformation regarding parental alienation (PA), that is, variations of the statement: "PA theory assumes that the favored parent has caused PA in the child simply because the child refuses to have a relationship with the rejected parent, without identifying or proving alienating behaviors by the favored parent. " Ninety-four examples of the same misinformation were identified and subjected to citation analysis using Gephi software, which displays the links between citing material and cited material. The recurrent misinformation reported here is not trivial; these statements are significant misrepresentations of PA theory. Plausible explanations for this trail of misinformation are the psychological mindset of the authors (i.e., confirmation bias) and the authors' writing skills (e.g., sloppy research practices such as persistent use of secondary sources for their information). The authors of this article recommend that publications containing significant misinformation should be corrected or retracted.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 245
页数:15
相关论文
共 3 条