Who is responsible for 'responsible AI'?: Navigating challenges to build trust in AI agriculture and food system technology

被引:4
|
作者
Alexander, Carrie S. [1 ]
Yarborough, Mark [2 ]
Smith, Aaron [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, AI Inst Food Syst AIFS, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Bioeth Program, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Precision agriculture; AI ethics; Trustworthy AI; Food policy; Technology adoption; CO-INNOVATION APPROACH; METAPHORS; SECURITY; RESOURCE; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11119-023-10063-3
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This article presents findings from interviews that were conducted with agriculture and food system researchers to understand their views about what it means to conduct 'responsible' or 'trustworthy' artificial intelligence (AI) research. Findings are organized into four themes: (1) data access and related ethical problems; (2) regulations and their impact on AI food system technology research; (3) barriers to the development and adoption of AI-based food system technologies; and (4) bridges of trust that researchers feel are important in overcoming the barriers they identified. All four themes reveal gray areas and contradictions that make it challenging for academic researchers to earn the trust of farmers and food producers. At the same time, this trust is foundational to research that would contribute to the development of high-quality AI technologies. Factors such as increasing regulations and worsening environmental conditions are stressing agricultural systems and are opening windows of opportunity for technological solutions. However, the dysfunctional process of technology development and adoption revealed in these interviews threatens to close these windows prematurely. Insights from these interviews can support governments and institutions in developing policies that will keep the windows open by helping to bridge divides between interests and supporting the development of technologies that deserve to be called "responsible" or "trustworthy" AI.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 185
页数:40
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Who is responsible for ‘responsible AI’?: Navigating challenges to build trust in AI agriculture and food system technology
    Carrie S. Alexander
    Mark Yarborough
    Aaron Smith
    [J]. Precision Agriculture, 2024, 25 : 146 - 185
  • [2] Build Back Better with Responsible AI
    Lars Kunze
    [J]. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 2021, 35 : 1 - 3
  • [3] Build Back Better with Responsible AI
    Kunze, Lars
    [J]. KUNSTLICHE INTELLIGENZ, 2021, 35 (01): : 1 - 3
  • [4] Responsible AI: requirements and challenges
    Malik Ghallab
    [J]. AI Perspectives, 1 (1):
  • [5] Responsible media technology and AI: challenges and research directions
    Christoph Trattner
    Dietmar Jannach
    Enrico Motta
    Irene Costera Meijer
    Nicholas Diakopoulos
    Mehdi Elahi
    Andreas L. Opdahl
    Bjørnar Tessem
    Njål Borch
    Morten Fjeld
    Lilja Øvrelid
    Koenraad De Smedt
    Hallvard Moe
    [J]. AI and Ethics, 2022, 2 (4): : 585 - 594
  • [6] Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI Challenges
    Wang, Qiaosi
    Madaio, Michael
    Kane, Shaun
    Kapania, Shivani
    Terry, Michael
    Wilcox, Lauren
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2023), 2023,
  • [7] Responsible AI Systems: Who are the Stakeholders?
    Deshpande, Advait
    Sharp, Helen
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 AAAI/ACM CONFERENCE ON AI, ETHICS, AND SOCIETY, AIES 2022, 2022, : 227 - 236
  • [8] The role and challenges of education for responsible AI
    Dignum, Virginia
    [J]. LONDON REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2021, 19 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [9] Generative AI Meets Responsible AI: Practical Challenges and Opportunities
    Kenthapadi, Krishnaram
    Lakkaraju, Himabindu
    Rajani, Nazneen
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH ACM SIGKDD CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, KDD 2023, 2023, : 5805 - 5806
  • [10] Who is responsible? US Public perceptions of AI governance through the lenses of trust and ethics
    David, Prabu
    Choung, Hyesun
    Seberger, John S.
    [J]. PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2024, 33 (05) : 654 - 672