Strategies to enhance remote monitoring adherence among patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices

被引:1
|
作者
Rotering, Thomas L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hysong, Sylvia J. [4 ,5 ]
Williams, Katherine E. [1 ,6 ]
Raitt, Merritt H. [7 ,8 ]
Whooley, Mary A. [1 ,3 ,9 ]
Dhruva, Sanket S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,10 ]
机构
[1] San Francisco Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, San Francisco, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco Sch Med, Dept Med, Sect Cardiol, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Philip R Lee Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Ctr Innovat Qual Effectiveness & Safety, Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[5] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Med, Sect Hlth Serv Res, Houston, TX USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[7] Portland Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, Portland, OR USA
[8] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Knight Cardiovasc Inst, Portland, OR USA
[9] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, San Francisco, CA USA
[10] 4150 Clement St,Bldg 203,111C, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
来源
HEART RHYTHM O2 | 2023年 / 4卷 / 12期
关键词
Cardiovascular implantable electronic device; Pace-maker; Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Remote monitoring; Patient adherence; HEALTH-CARE UTILIZATION; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; PACEMAKERS; SATISFACTION; EXPERIENCES; PREFERENCES; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; ICD;
D O I
10.1016/j.hroo.2023.11.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Remote monitoring (RM) of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) (pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators) has a Class 1, Level of Evidence A Heart Rhythm Society recommendation. Yet RM adherence varies widely across settings, and factors associated with variation are not understood.OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to identify strategies for supporting RM across Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities. METHODS In a national evaluation, we surveyed and interviewed 27 nurses, medical instrument technicians, and advanced practice providers across 26 VHA facilities (following approximately 15,000 CIED patients). Participants were selected based on overall patient adherence by facility, which ranged from 46%-96%. Questions covered RM adherence strategies, manufacturer resources, organizational characteristics, and workflows for optimizing adherence. RESULTS All clinicians reported that RM adherence was extremely important (53.8%), very important (34.6%), or important (11.5%) for improving patient outcomes. High performing facilities prioritized consistent patient education about RM and evaluated nonadherence using dashboards and manufacturer web sites. High performing facilities instituted clear standard operating procedures that defined staff responsibilities and facilitated efficient contact with nonadherent patients and then family members by phone and then mail. Clinicians based at high performing facilities spent twice as many hours per week (9.1) on average managing RM adherence compared to other facilities (4.5). Effective communication (internally and with non-VHA care partners) and use of CIED manufacturer resources were essential. Facilities that were not high performing rarely used these strategies.CONCLUSION Clinicians can support high RM adherence by emphasizing patient education, regularly assessing and addressing nonadherence using staff protocols, and engaging CIED manufacturers.
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 804
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Factors associated with remote monitoring adherence for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices
    Muniyappa, Anoop N.
    Raitt, Merritt H.
    Judson, Gregory L.
    Shen, Hui
    Tarasovsky, Gary
    Whooley, Mary A.
    Dhruva, Sanket S.
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2022, 19 (09) : 1499 - 1507
  • [2] Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices
    Sticherling, Christian
    Kuehne, Michael
    Schaer, Beat
    Altmann, David
    Osswald, Stefan
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2009, 139 (41-42) : 596 - 601
  • [3] Remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in Japan
    Okamura, Hideo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2014, 30 (06) : 421 - 427
  • [4] What is the optimal remote monitoring schedule in pediatric patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices?
    Tsao, Sabrina
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (07): : 963 - 964
  • [5] Utilization and Adherence to Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients Comparable to Adults
    Patel, Akash
    Davis, Kevin
    Connolly, Allision T.
    Prillinger, Julie B.
    Nabutovsky, Yelena
    Tanel, Ronn E.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [6] PATIENT ADHERENCE IN REMOTE FOLLOW-UP OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMPLANTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES
    Ren, Xiushui
    Apostolakos, Christina
    Thuy-Hong Vo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (13) : E645 - E645
  • [7] A Review on Remote Monitoring Technology Applied to Implantable Electronic Cardiovascular Devices
    Costa, Paulo Dias
    Rodrigues, Pedro Pereira
    Reis, Antonio Hipolito
    Costa-Pereira, Altamiro
    [J]. TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2010, 16 (10): : 1042 - 1050
  • [8] System dynamics in remote monitoring service for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices
    Leung, Lisa W.S.
    Roudsari, Abdul
    Kuo, Alex
    Courtney, Karen L.
    [J]. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 2019, 257 : 277 - 282
  • [9] Remote monitoring for active cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a European survey
    Halimi, Franck
    Cantu, Francesco
    [J]. EUROPACE, 2010, 12 (12): : 1778 - 1780
  • [10] Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices: New Questions Raised
    Joglar, Jose A.
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 32 (12): : 1489 - 1491