Missile Threat Detection and Evasion Maneuvers With Countermeasures for a Low-Altitude Aircraft

被引:1
|
作者
Tian, Zijiao [1 ]
Danino, Meir [2 ]
Bar-Shalom, Yaakov [1 ]
Milgrom, Benny [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Bar Ilan Univ, Elect Engn Fac, IL-5290002 Ramat Gan, Israel
[3] Jerusalem Coll Technol, Elect Engn Fac, IL-91160 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
Missiles; Trajectory; Maximum likelihood estimation; Aerospace electronics; Turning; Azimuth; Propulsion; Collision avoidance; flares; guided missile; maximum likelihood estimation (MLE); proportional navigation; PROPORTIONAL NAVIGATION; POINT ESTIMATION; PASSIVE SENSOR; IDENTIFICATION; TRAJECTORIES; GUIDANCE; FIGHTER;
D O I
10.1109/TAES.2023.3287153
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This article investigates man-portable air defense systems (MANPAD) missile threat detection and an effective maneuvering strategy for aircraft (A/C) destruction avoidance. The 3-D trajectory of a multistage missile (boost and sustain phases) under pure proportional navigation is first estimated. The maximum likelihood estimator is used to estimate its motion parameters of the two-stage missile considered using only angle measurements from a low-altitude A/C. Missile threat detection is investigated based on two methods: 1) estimation-based as a baseline method and 2) threat-plane-based. The former can provide a miss distance between the A/C and the missile, but more measurements are required. The latter is shown to give a faster threat alert, allowing the A/C to start the evasive maneuver earlier. An efficient evasion maneuver for avoiding destruction is banking away from the missile by a turning maneuver in the horizontal plane due to its low altitude. The survivability probability of the A/C is evaluated with and without countermeasures (flares). There are two key factors that affect the evasion performance: 1) maneuver start time and 2) the maximum acceleration during the maneuver. Simulations show that the A/C can start maneuvering earlier using the threat-plane-based method compared with the estimation-based method. It can successfully evade the missile with the help of maneuvering. It is also shown that using flares, the necessary maneuver is less drastic (lower g's). Simulation results compare the necessary g's for obtaining a certain minimal distance from the missile.
引用
收藏
页码:7352 / 7362
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimation-based missile threat detection and evasion maneuver for a low-altitude aircraft
    Tian, Zijiao
    Danino, Meir
    Bar-Shalom, Yaakov
    Milgrom, Benny
    [J]. SIGNAL PROCESSING, SENSOR/INFORMATION FUSION, AND TARGET RECOGNITION XXXII, 2023, 12547
  • [2] Low-Altitude Aircraft Routing
    M. Yu. Petrov
    [J]. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, 2019, 58 : 467 - 473
  • [3] Low-Altitude Aircraft Routing
    Petrov, M. Yu.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND SYSTEMS SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 58 (03) : 467 - 473
  • [5] Low-altitude airbursts and the impact threat
    Boslough, M. B. E.
    Crawford, D. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING, 2008, 35 (12) : 1441 - 1448
  • [6] HORIZON PROFILE CHECKPOINTS FOR LOW-ALTITUDE AIRCRAFT
    CARLSON, GE
    BAIR, GL
    BENOIT, CM
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, 1976, 12 (02) : 152 - 161
  • [7] Low-altitude studies target big aircraft
    Nordwall, BD
    [J]. AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 144 (20): : 50 - 51
  • [8] AN ADJUNCT TRACKING SYSTEM FOR LOW-ALTITUDE SECTOR AIRCRAFT
    HERSHEY, JE
    HARRISON, DD
    PATTANAYAK, DN
    MURROW, DJ
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BROADCASTING, 1994, 40 (01) : 44 - 49
  • [9] Responses of caribou to overflights by low-altitude jet aircraft
    Maier, JAK
    Murphy, SM
    White, RG
    Smith, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1998, 62 (02): : 752 - 766
  • [10] Threat identification for low-altitude target track based on HMM
    Yu X.
    Wei S.
    Sheng J.
    Zhang L.
    [J]. Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2023, 45 (05): : 1399 - 1408