A Chink in the Armour? - "Good Surgical Practice" Audit of Operative Notes

被引:0
|
作者
Lokesh, M. N. [1 ]
Shetty, Risha [1 ]
Kulkarni, Srikanth [1 ]
Doddasamiah, Sreenivas Murthy [1 ]
机构
[1] BGS Global Inst Med Sci, Dept Gen Surg, Bengaluru, India
关键词
Audit; Operative notes; RCSEng guidelines; Good Surgical Practice; QUALITY; SURGERY; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.1007/s12262-023-03878-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
A thorough and accurate operative note is an essential part of a good surgeon's armamentarium. It serves as a crucial guide for postoperative patient care and has medico-legal ramifications. To assess the quality and completeness of operative notes in comparison with Royal College of England (RCSEng) guidelines, we, in a tertiary care hospital, conducted a closed-loop audit analysis of 100 random operative notes, for completeness and accuracy. The major deficiencies were details of operative findings, estimated blood loss, identification of prosthesis, and mention of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. After highlighting these lacunae, we educated surgeons and surgical trainees on the "Good Surgical Practice" recommendations by RCSEng. After the implementation of a new proforma for operative notes, a reaudit was done of 100 random operative notes after 3 months, to check for compliance. The overall quality of operative notes improved particularly with respect to date and time of surgery, operative findings, estimated blood loss, identification of prosthesis, and mention of thromboembolism prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 379
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Electronic or Hand-Written? An Audit Comparing Compliance of Operative Notes to Good Surgical Practice Standards
    Batten, T. J.
    Patel, N. G.
    Ricketts, M. K.
    Davis, J.
    Wansbrough, G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 89 - 90
  • [2] Electronic operative notes in emergency surgery - audit against RCS 2014 Good Surgical Practice guidelines
    Gordon, A.
    McAuley, C.
    Farkas, N.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 : 131 - 132
  • [3] Audit of Operation Notes in ENT: Improving Documentation in line with 'Good Surgical Practice 2014'
    Donaldson, G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 71 - 71
  • [4] Operative Notes Audit
    Woo, A.
    McMillian, T.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 101 - 101
  • [5] Comparing the quality of handwritten versus computerised operative notes using the "Good Surgical Practice" guidelines
    Soobrah, R.
    Mallappa, S.
    Shenouda, M.
    Warusavitarne, J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 99 : 197 - 197
  • [6] 374Are Operative Notes Adhering to the Standards of Good Practice?
    Lipski, C.
    Bleibeh, S.
    Hanif, U.
    Sinha, M.
    Waites, M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109
  • [7] An audit on the quality of operative notes
    Lutfi, A.
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 188 : S106 - S106
  • [8] An audit to identify adherence of laparoscopic appendicectomy operation notes to Royal College of Surgeons Good Surgical Practice standards
    Sachi Shah
    Andrew Refalo
    Husam Ebied
    Ahmed Hammad
    [J]. Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2022, 191 : 825 - 830
  • [9] An audit to identify adherence of laparoscopic appendicectomy operation notes to Royal College of Surgeons Good Surgical Practice standards
    Shah, Sachi
    Refalo, Andrew
    Ebied, Husam
    Hammad, Ahmed
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 191 (02) : 825 - 830
  • [10] An audit of post-operative notes
    Mahomed, H.
    Carroll, P.
    Cleary, M.
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 186 : S268 - S269