How to Identify your Design Science Research Artifact

被引：1

作者：

Weigand, Hans ^{[1
]}

Johannesson, Paul ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Tilburg Univ, TiSEM, Dept Management, Tilburg, Netherlands

[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Comp & Syst Sci, Stockholm, Sweden

来源：

2023 IEEE 25TH CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS INFORMATICS, CBI | 2023年

关键词：

Design Science; artifact ontology; research methodology;

D O I：

10.1109/CBI58679.2023.10187511

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

Design Science Research (DSR) is about the development and investigation of artifacts in context. However, in many articles that subscribe to a DSR approach, the artifact is not clearly classified and identified. Very little attention has been given in the DSR literature on this topic, so guidelines are lacking. Based on artifact ontology, this paper proposes guidelines for design researchers in the IS domain on how to specify both the artifact and the research objective. For validation, the guidelines have been applied to a range of DSR papers. Our results show that the artifact definition guidelines can add to the precision of the research object specification.

引用

页码：133 / 142

页数：10

共 50 条

[1] An artifact ontology for design science research
Weigand, Hans
Johannesson, Paul
Andersson, Birger
[J]. DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2021, 133
[2] Pragmatizing the Normative Artifact: Design Science Research in Scandinavia and Beyond
Agerfalk, Par J.
Wiberg, Mikael
[J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 43 (43): : 68 - 77
[3] Clustering Design Science Research Based on the Nature of the Designed Artifact
Laine, Joakim
Zimmer, Markus Philipp
Minkkinen, Matti
Salmela, Hannu
Mäntymäki, Matti
[J]. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 2022, 13454 LNCS : 254 - 266
[4] Clustering Design Science Research Based on the Nature of the Designed Artifact
Laine, Joakim
Zimmer, Markus Philipp
Minkkinen, Matti
Salmela, Hannu
Mantymaki, Matti
[J]. ROLE OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN SHAPING THE POST-PANDEMIC WORLD, 2022, 13454 : 254 - 266
[5] Design Science Research Contributions: Finding a Balance between Artifact and Theory
Baskerville, Richard
Baiyere, Abayomi
Gregor, Shirley
Hevner, Alan
Rossi, Matti
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 19 (05): : 358 - 376
[6] Unpacking the Artifact Knowledge: Secondary Data Analysis in Design Science Research
Dolata, Mateusz
Kilic, Mehmet
Schwabe, Gerhard
[J]. NEW HORIZONS IN DESIGN SCIENCE: BROADENING THE RESEARCH AGENDA, 2015, 9073 : 327 - 342
[7] DEMYSTIFYING SCIENCE COMMUNICATION: HOW TO INCREASE THE IMPACT OF YOUR RESEARCH
Buscemi, Joanna
Shen, Megan J.
Krukowski, Rebecca
Goldstein, Carly M.
[J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2022, 56 (SUPP 1) : S210 - S210
[8] How to optimise patient and public involvement in your research Doing science
Hardavella, Georgia
Bjerg, Anders
Saad, Neil
Jacinto, Tiago
Powell, Pippa
[J]. BREATHE, 2015, 11 (03) : 223 - 227
[9] Design science research application in medical radiation science education: A case study on the evaluation of a developed artifact
Mdletshe, Sibusiso
Motshweneng, Oupa Steven
Oliveira, Marcus
Twala, Bhekisipho
[J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2023, 54 (01) : 206 - 214
[10] How to identify the most suitable questionnaires and rating scales for your clinical practice or research?
Shoman, Yara
Majery, Nicole
Otelea, Marina
Lambreghts, Charlotte
Canu, Irina Guseva
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 75 (12)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →