Valorization for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the Agri-Food Value Chain

被引:1
|
作者
Voglhuber-Slavinsky, Ariane [1 ,2 ]
Lemke, Nahleen [3 ]
MacPherson, Joseph [3 ]
Doenitz, Ewa [1 ]
Olbrisch, Mathias [4 ]
Schoebel, Philipp [4 ]
Moller, Bjoern [1 ]
Bahrs, Enno [2 ]
Helming, Katharina [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Syst & Innovat Res ISI, Competence Ctr Foresight, Breslauer Str 48, D-76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Farm Management, Schwerzstr 44, D-70599 Stuttgart, Baden Wurttembe, Germany
[3] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[4] European Univ Viadrina Frankfurt Oder, Chair Publ Law Adm European Environm Agr & Food La, Res Ctr Digital Law, Grosse Scharrnstr 59, D-15230 Frankfurt, Germany
[5] Univ Sustainable Dev HNEE, Fac Landscape Management & Nat Conservat, Schickler Str 5, D-16225 Eberswalde, Germany
关键词
Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Valorization; Value chain; Foresight; Private valorization options; ECONOMIC VALUATION; GOVERNANCE; CHALLENGES; INSTRUMENTS; FRAMEWORK; MARKETS; ACTORS;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-023-01860-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article defines the term valorization of biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES) measures, as distinguished from their valuation, and underpins it with an assessment of private valorization examples along the agri-food value chain. Valorization incentivizes measures for promoting BES, while valuation refers to its quantification. Valuation can be a step of valorization but is not indispensable. In scientific literature, the terms valorization and valuation are often used interchangeably. In addition, there is a lack of research on private options versus conventional, public policy options. Therefore, we searched for private valorization options primarily in public sources (gray literature and websites). This led to the identification of four clusters (markets for voluntary services, labeling, and certification, environmental management/CSR, and tradable permits and quotas). Based on these clusters the options were assessed from a legal and systems dynamics perspective. In addition, the viability of selected valorization options in different future scenarios was examined. The analysis revealed a wide range of private valorization options, which in contrast to public policy options that focus almost entirely on the production stage, are spread across the agri-food value chain. Their suitability differs under different future scenarios, legal and systems conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1188
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Valorization for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the Agri-Food Value Chain
    Ariane Voglhuber-Slavinsky
    Nahleen Lemke
    Joseph MacPherson
    Ewa Dönitz
    Mathias Olbrisch
    Philipp Schöbel
    Björn Moller
    Enno Bahrs
    Katharina Helming
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2023, 72 : 1163 - 1188
  • [2] Value adding in the agri-food value chain
    Cucagna, Maria Emilia
    Goldsmith, Peter D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FOOD AND AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2018, 21 (03): : 293 - 316
  • [3] Value chain partnerships and farmer entrepreneurship as balancing ecosystem services: Implications for agri-food systems resilience
    Manyise, Timothy
    Dentoni, Domenico
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2021, 49
  • [4] INNOVATIVE AGRI-FOOD VALUE CHAIN MANAGEMENT THROUGH A UNIQUE URBAN ECOSYSTEM
    Constantin, Marius
    Strat, Georgiana
    Deaconu, Madalina Elena
    Patarlageanu, Simona Roxana
    [J]. MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 13 (03): : 5 - 22
  • [5] Localized Agri-Food Systems and Biodiversity
    Bele, Bolette
    Norderhaug, Ann
    Sickel, Hanne
    [J]. AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2018, 8 (02):
  • [6] Needs of the agri-food chain
    不详
    [J]. FOOD AUSTRALIA, 2006, 58 (03): : 70 - 70
  • [7] Agri-Food Chain Relationships
    van Trijp, Hans C. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 38 (01) : 168 - 170
  • [8] Safety in the agri-food chain
    Kvam, Gunn-Turid
    Haukenes, Anne
    Magnus, Trine
    [J]. RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2007, 72 (04) : 648 - 651
  • [9] Agri-food value chains and the global food dollar: The role of trade and services
    Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano
    Jelliffe, Jeremy
    Hoekman, Bernard
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2024, 127
  • [10] Ecosystem services and biodiversity appraisals by means of life cycle tools: state-of-art in agri-food and forestry field
    Soldati C.
    De Luca A.I.
    Iofrida N.
    Spada E.
    Gulisano G.
    Falcone G.
    [J]. Agriculture & Food Security, 12 (1):