A combined statistical and machine learning approach for spatial prediction of extreme wildfire frequencies and sizes

被引:5
|
作者
Cisneros, Daniela [1 ]
Gong, Yan [1 ]
Yadav, Rishikesh [1 ]
Hazra, Arnab [1 ,2 ]
Huser, Raphael [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol KAUST, Elect & Math Sci & Engn CEMSE Div, Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia
[2] Indian Inst Technol Kanpur, Dept Math & Stat, Kanpur 208016, India
关键词
Approximate Bayesian inference; Extreme wildfire frequencies and sizes; Gaussian Markov random field; Random Forests; Stochastic partial differential equation; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s10687-022-00460-8
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Motivated by the Extreme Value Analysis 2021 (EVA 2021) data challenge, we propose a method based on statistics and machine learning for the spatial prediction of extreme wildfire frequencies and sizes. This method is tailored to handle large datasets, including missing observations. Our approach relies on a four-stage, bivariate, sparse spatial model for high-dimensional zero-inflated data that we develop using stochastic partial differential equations (SPDE), allowing sparse precision matrices for the latent processes. In Stage 1, the observations are separated in zero/nonzero categories and modeled using a two-layered hierarchical Bayesian sparse spatial model to estimate the probabilities of these two categories. In Stage 2, we first obtain empirical estimates of the spatially-varying mean and variance profiles across the spatial locations for the positive observations and smooth those estimates using fixed rank kriging. This approximate Bayesian inference method is employed to avoid the high computational burden of large spatial data modeling using spatially-varying coefficients. In Stage 3, we further model the standardized log-transformed positive observations from the second stage using a sparse bivariate spatial Gaussian process. The Gaussian distribution assumption for wildfire counts developed in the third stage is computationally effective but erroneous. Thus, in Stage 4, the predicted exceedance probabilities are post-processed using Random Forests. We draw posterior inference for Stages 1 and 3 using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. We then create a cross-validation scheme for the artificially generated gaps and compare the EVA 2021 prediction scores of the proposed model to those obtained using some competitors.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 330
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A combined statistical and machine learning approach for spatial prediction of extreme wildfire frequencies and sizes
    Daniela Cisneros
    Yan Gong
    Rishikesh Yadav
    Arnab Hazra
    Raphaël Huser
    [J]. Extremes, 2023, 26 : 301 - 330
  • [2] Soil Property Prediction: An Extreme Learning Machine Approach
    Masri, Dina
    Woon, Wei Lee
    Aung, Zeyar
    [J]. NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, PT II, 2015, 9490 : 18 - 27
  • [3] Machine Learning Approach for the Prediction of Nuclear Quadrupole Resonance Frequencies
    Iwase, Fumitatsu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2021, 90 (09)
  • [4] Crop Type Prediction: A Statistical and Machine Learning Approach
    Bhuyan, Bikram Pratim
    Tomar, Ravi
    Singh, T. P.
    Cherif, Amar Ramdane
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [5] An extreme learning machine approach for slope stability evaluation and prediction
    Zaobao Liu
    Jianfu Shao
    Weiya Xu
    Hongjie Chen
    Yu Zhang
    [J]. Natural Hazards, 2014, 73 : 787 - 804
  • [6] An extreme learning machine approach for slope stability evaluation and prediction
    Liu, Zaobao
    Shao, Jianfu
    Xu, Weiya
    Chen, Hongjie
    Zhang, Yu
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2014, 73 (02) : 787 - 804
  • [7] California Wildfire Prediction using Machine Learning
    Pham, Kaylee
    Ward, David
    Rubio, Saulo
    Shin, David
    Zlotikman, Lior
    Ramirez, Sergio
    Poplawski, Tyler
    Jiang, Xunfei
    [J]. 2022 21ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS, ICMLA, 2022, : 525 - 530
  • [8] An Integrated Statistical-Machine Learning Approach for Runoff Prediction
    Singh, Abhinav Kumar
    Kumar, Pankaj
    Ali, Rawshan
    Al-Ansari, Nadhir
    Vishwakarma, Dinesh Kumar
    Kushwaha, Kuldeep Singh
    Panda, Kanhu Charan
    Sagar, Atish
    Mirzania, Ehsan
    Elbeltagi, Ahmed
    Kuriqi, Alban
    Heddam, Salim
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [9] An Extreme Learning Machine Model Approach on Airbnb Base Price Prediction
    Priambodo, Fikri Nurqahhari
    Sihabuddin, Agus
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 11 (11) : 179 - 185
  • [10] Spatial Prediction of Wildfire Susceptibility Using Field Survey GPS Data and Machine Learning Approaches
    Ghorbanzadeh, Omid
    Kamran, Khalil Valizadeh
    Blaschke, Thomas
    Aryal, Jagannath
    Naboureh, Amin
    Einali, Jamshid
    Bian, Jinhu
    [J]. FIRE-SWITZERLAND, 2019, 2 (03): : 1 - 23