Overcoming barriers to knowledge co-production in academic-practitioner research collaboration

被引:10
|
作者
McCabe, Angela [1 ]
Parker, Rachel [2 ]
Osegowitsch, Tom [3 ]
Cox, Stephen [4 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, La Trobe Business Sch, Dept Management & Mkt, Melbourne, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, UQ Global Change Inst, Brisbane, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Management & Mkt, Melbourne, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol, QUT Business Sch, Brisbane, Australia
关键词
Knowledge co-production; Academic-practitioner research collaboration; University-industry collaboration; Research collaboration; Theory-practice gap; Research impact; MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; ENGAGED SCHOLARSHIP; RELEVANCE GAP; UNIVERSITY; INNOVATION; BUSINESS; SCIENCE; CLIMATE; DEBATE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.emj.2021.11.009
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Knowledge co-production involving collaborating academics and practitioners is a recognized vehicle for stim-ulating innovation. However, co-production is hampered by a number of significant barriers, including structural differences between the partners, the mismanagement of conflict, and a traditional outlook on knowledge. We explore academic-practitioner research collaborations to document the specific practices allowing collaborators to address co-production barriers. The primary data for this study were collected from semi-structured interviews with academics and practitioners working on 24 Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage projects. The main contribution of this investigation is the identification of 'academic cultivation' in overcoming barriers to knowledge co-production. Academic cultivation denotes a situation where practitioner behavior designed to overcome one or other of the co-production barriers is prompted through prior actions by the academic.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 222
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Knowledge co-production in academic-practitioner research collaboration: An expanded perspective on power
    McCabe, Angela.
    Osegowitsch, Tom
    Parker, Rachel
    Cox, Stephen
    [J]. MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2021, 52 (05) : 604 - 629
  • [2] Reflexivity in the co-production of academic-practitioner research
    Orr, Kevin
    Bennett, Mike
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONS AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 4 (01): : 85 - 102
  • [3] The #NotTheCost Campaign: An Academic-Practitioner Collaboration
    Pepera, Sandra
    Krook, Mona Lena
    [J]. POLITICS & GENDER, 2023, 19 (03) : 956 - 961
  • [4] Academic-practitioner collaboration in the neoliberal university
    McGiffin, Emily
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-REVUE CANADIENNE D ETUDES DU DEVELOPPEMENT, 2021, 42 (03): : 306 - 325
  • [5] Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration
    Amabile, TM
    Patterson, C
    Mueller, J
    Wojcik, T
    Odomirok, PW
    Marsh, M
    Kramer, SJ
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 44 (02): : 418 - 431
  • [6] Collaborating for policy impact: Academic-practitioner collaboration in industrial relations research
    McGrath-Champ, Susan
    Gavin, Mihajla
    Stacey, Meghan
    Wilson, Rachel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2022, 64 (05) : 759 - 784
  • [7] Practitioner research: collaboration and knowledge production
    Lunt, Neil
    Shaw, Ian
    Fouche, Christa
    [J]. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (04) : 235 - 242
  • [8] The Technical Communication Body of Knowledge Initiative: An Academic-Practitioner Partnership
    Coppola, Nancy W.
    [J]. TECHNICAL COMMUNICATION, 2010, 57 (01) : 11 - 25
  • [9] Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Toward a relational scholarship of integration
    Bartunek, Jean M.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 50 (06): : 1323 - 1333
  • [10] Effective academic-practitioner collaboration on gender research in federal law enforcement: the value of a coproduction process
    Yu, Helen H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2020, 86 (03) : 567 - 581