How Long Do Runoff-Generated Debris-Flow Hazards Persist After Wildfire?

被引:6
|
作者
Graber, Andrew P. [1 ]
Thomas, Matthew A. [1 ]
Kean, Jason W. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Geol Hazards Sci Ctr, Golden, CO 80401 USA
关键词
postfire debris-flow hazard persistence; debris flows; vegetation recovery; western United States; MODIS leaf area index; recovery ratio; debris flows and landslides; geomorphology: general; time series analysis; remote sensing; LEAF-AREA; RECOVERY; FIRE; THRESHOLDS; VALIDATION; CALIFORNIA; PRODUCTS; WATER;
D O I
10.1029/2023GL105101
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Runoff-generated debris flows are a potentially destructive and deadly response to wildfire until sufficient vegetation and soil-hydraulic recovery have reduced susceptibility to the hazard. Elevated debris-flow susceptibility may persist for several years, but the controls on the timespan of the susceptible period are poorly understood. To evaluate the connection between vegetation recovery and debris-flow occurrence, we calculated recovery for 25 fires in the western United States using satellite-derived leaf area index (LAI) and compared recovery estimates to the timing of 536 debris flows from the same fires. We found that the majority (>98%) of flows occurred when LAI was less than 2/3 of typical prefire values. Our results show that total vegetation recovery is not necessary to inhibit runoff-generated flows in a wide variety of regions in the western United States. Satellite-derived vegetation data show promise for estimating the timespan of debris-flow susceptibility.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] The formation of runoff-generated debris flow in Southwestern of China: take Gangou as an example
    Yong Bo Tie
    Ru Ge Xu
    Ren Ji Ba
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014, 72 : 1479 - 1490
  • [2] Comprehensive modelling of runoff-generated debris flow from formation to propagation in a catchment
    Wei Liu
    Siming He
    [J]. Landslides, 2020, 17 : 1529 - 1544
  • [3] The formation of runoff-generated debris flow in Southwestern of China: take Gangou as an example
    Tie, Yong Bo
    Xu, Ru Ge
    Ba, Ren Ji
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2014, 72 (05) : 1479 - 1490
  • [4] Comprehensive modelling of runoff-generated debris flow from formation to propagation in a catchment
    Liu, Wei
    He, Siming
    [J]. LANDSLIDES, 2020, 17 (07) : 1529 - 1544
  • [5] The Use of Rain Gauge Measurements and Radar Data for the Model-Based Prediction of Runoff-Generated Debris-Flow Occurrence in Early Warning Systems
    Bernard, Martino
    Gregoretti, Carlo
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2021, 57 (03)
  • [6] Inundation and flow properties of a runoff-generated debris flow following successive high-severity wildfires in northern Arizona, USA
    Gorr, Alexander N.
    Mcguire, Luke A.
    Youberg, Ann M.
    Beers, Rebecca
    Liu, Tao
    [J]. EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2024, 49 (02) : 622 - 641
  • [7] Progress in simplifying hydrologic model parameterization for broad applications to post-wildfire flooding and debris-flow hazards
    Rengers, F. K.
    McGuire, L. A.
    Kean, J. W.
    Staley, D. M.
    Youberg, A. M.
    [J]. EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 2019, 44 (15) : 3078 - 3092
  • [8] Contribution of Excessive Supply of Solid Material to a Runoff-Generated Debris Flow during Its Routing Along a Gully and Its Impact on the Downstream Village with Blockage Effects
    Chen, Ming-liang
    Liu, Xing-nian
    Wang, Xie-kang
    Zhao, Tao
    Zhou, Jia-wen
    [J]. WATER, 2019, 11 (01):
  • [9] Estimating post-fire debris-flow hazards prior to wildfire using a statistical analysis of historical distributions of fire severity from remote sensing data
    Staley, Dennis M.
    Tillery, Anne C.
    Kean, Jason W.
    McGuire, Luke A.
    Pauling, Hannah E.
    Rengers, Francis K.
    Smith, Joel B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2018, 27 (09) : 595 - 608
  • [10] For how long after flexible cystoscopy do artifactual cytological changes of urine persist?
    Amiel, GE
    Lerner, SP
    [J]. NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2005, 2 (01): : 10 - 11