Discontinuation of Contact Precautions for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Pediatric Healthcare System

被引:0
|
作者
Most, Zachary M. [1 ,2 ]
Phillips, Bethany [2 ]
Sebert, Michael E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Infect Dis, Dallas, TX USA
[2] Childrens Med Ctr Dallas, Infect Prevent & Control Dept, Childrens Hlth Syst Texas, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
healthcare-associated infections; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; multidrug-resistant organisms; pediatrics; transmission-based precautions; ENTEROCOCCUS; INFECTIONS; ORGANISMS; IMPACT; MRSA; VRE;
D O I
10.1093/jpids/piae001
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background Many hospitals caring for adult patients have discontinued the requirement for contact precautions (CP) for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection or colonization without reported negative effects. It is not clear whether this experience can be extrapolated to pediatric facilities.Methods CP for MRSA were discontinued in all locations except the neonatal intensive care unit at a 3-hospital pediatric healthcare system in September 2019. All hospitalized patients underwent surveillance for LabID healthcare facility-onset MRSA infections. Analysis was done using interrupted time series (ITS) from September 2017 through August 2023 and aggregate before-and-after rate ratios.Results There were 234 incident healthcare facility-onset MRSA infections during 766 020 patient days of surveillance. After discontinuation of CP for MRSA there was no change in the ITS slope (0.06, 95% CI: -0.35 to 0.47, P = .78) or intercept (0.21, 95% CI: -0.36 to 0.78, P = .47) of the LabID healthcare facility-onset MRSA infection incidence density rate. Additionally, there was no change in the aggregate incidence density rate of these MRSA LabID events (aggregate rate ratio = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.28). MRSA nasal colonization among patients being screened before cardiac surgery did not change (aggregate rate ratio = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.48). The prevalence rate of contact isolation days decreased by 14.0%.Conclusions Discontinuation of CP for pediatric patients with MRSA was not associated with increased MRSA infection over 4 years. Our experience supports considering discontinuation of CP for MRSA in similar pediatric healthcare settings in the context of good adherence to horizontal infection prevention measures. The requirement for contact precautions when caring for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was discontinued in all locations within the 3 hospitals of a pediatric healthcare system except the neonatal intensive care unit. No increase in MRSA infection or colonization was subsequently observed.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 128
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of rapid screening for discontinuation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contact precautions
    Shenoy, Erica S.
    Lee, Hang
    Cotter, Jessica A.
    Ware, Winston
    Kelbaugh, Douglas
    Weil, Eric
    Walensky, Rochelle P.
    Hooper, David C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2016, 44 (02) : 215 - 221
  • [2] Discontinuation of Contact Precautions for Patients No Longer Colonized with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Vikram, Holenarasipur R.
    Dumigan, Diane G.
    Kohan, Cynthia
    Havill, Nancy L.
    Tauman, Allison
    Boyce, John M.
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 31 (05): : 541 - 543
  • [3] Modeling relaxed policies for discontinuation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contact precautions
    Cui, Jiaming
    Heavey, Jack
    Lin, Leo
    Klein, Eili Y.
    Madden, Gregory R.
    Sifri, Costi D.
    Lewis, Bryan
    Vullikanti, Anil K.
    Prakash, B. Aditya
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL & HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 45 (07) : 833 - 838
  • [4] Journal Club: Impact of rapid screening for discontinuation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contact precautions
    Gase, Kathleen A.
    Reese, Sara M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2016, 44 (04) : 475 - 476
  • [5] Are Contact Precautions "Essential" for the Prevention of Healthcare-associated Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus?
    Diekema, Daniel J.
    Nori, Priya
    Stevens, Michael P.
    Smith, Matthew W.
    Coffey, K. C.
    Morgan, Daniel J.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 78 (05) : 1289 - 1294
  • [6] Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Are They Still Valuable?
    Jennifer Brown
    [J]. Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports, 2014, 2 (4) : 189 - 195
  • [7] Contact Precautions for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Are They Still Valuable?
    Brown, Jennifer
    [J]. CURRENT EMERGENCY AND HOSPITAL MEDICINE REPORTS, 2014, 2 (04): : 189 - 195
  • [8] Degowning the controversies of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A review
    Kullar, Ravina
    Vassallo, Angela
    Turkel, Sarah
    Chopra, Teena
    Kaye, Keith S.
    Dhar, Sorabh
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2016, 44 (01) : 97 - 103
  • [9] Contact precautions for Clostridium difficile and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
    Prieto, Jacqui
    Clark, Jill Macleod
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN NURSING, 2005, 10 (05) : 511 - 526
  • [10] Contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization: Costly and unnecessary?
    Spence, Michael R.
    Dammel, Tereal
    Courser, Shari
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2012, 40 (06) : 535 - 538