Beyond the Social Mission: How Social Responsibility in Nonprofit Organizations May Stimulate Positive Employee Outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Kluijtmans, Tom [1 ]
Crucke, Saskia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Mkt Innovat & Org, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Ghent, Belgium
来源
VOLUNTAS | 2024年 / 35卷 / 04期
关键词
Social responsibility; Organizational citizenship behaviour; Leadership integrity; Perceived organizational support; Societal impact potential; PUBLIC-SERVICE MOTIVATION; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; FOR-PROFIT; AFFECTIVE COMMITMENT; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; JOB-SATISFACTION; LEADERSHIP; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11266-024-00644-9
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Building on social exchange theory and self-determination theory, this paper studies how commitment to social responsibility in nonprofit organizations (NPOs) affects their employees. Social responsibility concerns NPOs' voluntary engagement into ethical behaviour extending beyond the narrow mandate of their social mission and legal responsibilities. Given the prosocial motivation of nonprofit employees, it is argued that contributing to the well-being of stakeholders beyond the social mission by engaging in social responsibility may result in favourable employee outcomes. The results of our study, using a sample of 1335 employees of healthcare NPOs in Flanders, confirm that social responsibility positively relates to employees' organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) as commitment to social responsibility enhances perceptions of organizational support and social impact potential among nonprofit employees. The results further indicate that the consistent display of integrity and moral values by leaders by demonstrating leadership integrity positively influences the relationship between social responsibility and OCB.
引用
收藏
页码:780 / 791
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hypocritical organizations: Implications for employee social responsibility
    Babu, Nishat
    De Roeck, Kenneth
    Raineri, Nicolas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 114 : 376 - 384
  • [2] Examining Collaboration Among Nonprofit Organizations for Social Responsibility Programs
    Zeimers, Geraldine
    Anagnostopoulos, Christos
    Zintz, Thierry
    Willem, Annick
    [J]. NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2019, 48 (05) : 953 - 974
  • [3] Mission-first social enterprises: A case study of how three nonprofit organizations avoided mission drift when forming and operating social enterprises
    Jones, Jennifer A.
    Krasynska, Svitlana
    Donmoyer, Robert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR MARKETING, 2020,
  • [4] Modeling Employee Social Responsibility as an Antecedent to Competitiveness Outcomes
    Cheruiyot, Thomas Kimeli
    Tarus, Daniel Kipkirong
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2015, 5 (01):
  • [5] Corporate social responsibility in nonprofit organizations: The brokerage role of community housing mutuals
    Phillips, Steve
    Taylor, Dan
    [J]. STRATEGIC CHANGE-BRIEFINGS IN ENTREPRENEURIAL FINANCE, 2020, 29 (04): : 425 - 434
  • [6] Corporate social responsibility and employee outcomes: considering employee perspectives on the role of business
    DeGhetto, Kaitlyn
    Russell, Zachary A.
    McAllister, Charn P.
    [J]. SOCIETY AND BUSINESS REVIEW, 2024, 19 (02) : 266 - 285
  • [7] Supererogation: Beyond Positive Deviance and Corporate Social Responsibility
    Mazutis, Daina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2014, 119 (04) : 517 - 528
  • [8] Supererogation: Beyond Positive Deviance and Corporate Social Responsibility
    Daina Mazutis
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2014, 119 : 517 - 528
  • [9] Information, Community, and Action: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media
    Lovejoy, Kristen
    Saxton, Gregory D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, 2012, 17 (03): : 337 - 353
  • [10] Corporate social responsibility and employee outcomes: The role of country context
    McNamara, Tay K.
    Carapinha, Rene
    Pitt-Catsouphes, Marcie
    Valcour, Monique
    Lobel, Sharon
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS-A EUROPEAN REVIEW, 2017, 26 (04) : 413 - 427