Self-determination Theory and Social Work Values

被引:3
|
作者
Kirzner, Rachel S. [1 ,3 ]
Miserandino, Marianne [2 ]
机构
[1] Stockton Univ, Sch Social & Behav Sci, Galloway, NJ USA
[2] Arcadia Univ, Psychol Dept, Glenside, PA USA
[3] Stockton Univ, 101 Vera King Farris Dr, Galloway, NJ 08205 USA
关键词
self-determination theory; program planning; program evaluation; social work ethics; social justice; BASIC PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; STRUCTURAL RACISM; AUTONOMY; WELL; POVERTY; SATISFACTION; ADHERENCE; STUDENTS; MOTIVES;
D O I
10.1177/10497315231155424
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Self-determination theory (SDT) is an evidence-based approach to programs promoting behavioral change. Social work researchers are increasingly incorporating SDT into program planning and evaluation. Yet the theory itself, developed within the discipline of psychology, has not been fully evaluated for congruence with social work values and perspectives. We compare the core tenets of SDT to values found within the United States National Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics, and find that there is a significant overlap between SDT and social work values. Areas of congruence include autonomy, relatedness, and the importance of human relationships. There are some concepts within SDT that need special consideration when used by social workers, in particular competence and motivation. These constructs have been used to support narratives of individual responsibility in the face of problems caused by societal structures. Further, the theory's traditional framing of context has not explicitly highlighted social justice. SDT has been shown to be an effective strategy in supporting behavioral change. Social workers must be careful to include structural factors such as poverty and discrimination when applying SDT to planning and evaluating social work programs. With these considerations, we suggest that SDT can be a powerful tool for planning and evaluation of social interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 665
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Self-determination theory and work motivation
    Gagné, M
    Deci, EL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2005, 26 (04) : 331 - 362
  • [2] SOCIAL-WORK AND SELF-DETERMINATION
    LEVY, CS
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK, 1995, 40 (05) : 720 - 720
  • [3] SOCIAL-WORK AND SELF-DETERMINATION
    SPICKER, P
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 1990, 20 (03): : 221 - 236
  • [4] Self-determination theory and the social psychology of creativity
    Hennessey, BA
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2000, 11 (04) : 293 - 298
  • [5] Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations: The State of a Science
    Deci, Edward L.
    Olafsen, Anja H.
    Ryan, Richard M.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 4, 2017, 4 : 19 - 43
  • [6] Self-Determination Theory: about the quality of work motivation
    Van den Broeck, Anja
    Vansteenkiste, Maarten
    De Witte, Hans
    Lens, Willy
    Andriessen, Maarten
    [J]. GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE, 2009, 22 (04): : 316 - 335
  • [7] Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory
    Gagne, Marylene
    Parker, Sharon K.
    Griffin, Mark A.
    Dunlop, Patrick D.
    Knight, Caroline
    Klonek, Florian E.
    Parent-Rocheleau, Xavier
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 1 (07): : 378 - 392
  • [8] A profile approach to self-determination theory motivations at work
    Moran, Christina M.
    Diefendorff, James M.
    Kim, Tae-Yeol
    Liu, Zhi-Qiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2012, 81 (03) : 354 - 363
  • [9] APPLICATION OF THE SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY IN WORK MOTIVATION RESEARCH
    Majstorovic, Nebojsa
    [J]. PRIMENJENA PSIHOLOGIJA, 2008, 1 (1-2): : 5 - 18
  • [10] Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory
    Marylène Gagné
    Sharon K. Parker
    Mark A. Griffin
    Patrick D. Dunlop
    Caroline Knight
    Florian E. Klonek
    Xavier Parent-Rocheleau
    [J]. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2022, 1 : 378 - 392