Comparison of 68GA-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in detection of metastatic bone disease in various cancers

被引:0
|
作者
Kepenek, F. [1 ]
Kaplan, I [1 ]
Can, C. [1 ]
Karaoglan, H. [1 ]
Guzel, Y. [1 ]
Komek, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Saglik Bilimleri Univ, Diyarbakir Gazi Yasargil Training & Res Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Diyarbakir, Turkiye
来源
MEDECINE NUCLEAIRE-IMAGERIE FONCTIONNELLE ET METABOLIQUE | 2023年 / 47卷 / 04期
关键词
18F-FDG; 68Ga-FAPI-04; PET; CT; SUVmax; Bone metastasis; LESIONS; TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.mednuc.2022.12.002
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Objective. - Our aim in this retrospective study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting bone metastases of various cancers and to evaluate the potential usefulness of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in detecting metastatic bone disease. Material and method. - Our retrospective study included 44 patients diagnosed with bone metastases due to various cancers between January 2021 and February 2022. All patients underwent 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging within 14 days. In the semi-quantitative analysis of the skeletal system, all regions with higher uptake than background activity were considered pathological. SUVmax and Metastasis-to-background ratio (TBR) values were calculated from metastatic sites. Results. - A total of 827 bone metastases were detected in our study. The diagnostic accuracies of FAPI PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT were 91.8% and 81.5%, respectively (P < 0.001). When all bone metastases were compared, the SUVmax of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was statistically significantly higher than that of 18F-FDG PET/CT (median 6.15 vs. 5.2; P < 0.001). When FDG and FAPI SUVmax values were compared according to metastasis types, FAPI SUVmax and TBR values in osteolytic, medullary and mixed type bone metastases were found to be statistically significantly higher than FDG (P-values: < 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.001, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between FDG and FAPI SUVmax values in osteoblastic bone metastases (P = 0.26). Conclusion. - It has been shown that 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT is superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting metastatic bone disease and may have more clinical impact on disease management. ⠂C 2023 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 207
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for the Evaluation of Cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison With 18F-FDG PET/CT and Abdominal 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR
    Zhang, Zeyu
    Cheng, Chao
    Jiang, Hui
    Pan, Guixia
    Yu, Yong
    Jin, Gang
    Zuo, Changjing
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 49 (05) : 409 - 418
  • [2] 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT Findings of Abdominal Leiomyosarcoma
    Guzel, Yunus
    Can, Canan
    Sogutcu, Nilgun
    Gundes, Ebubekir
    Gundogan, Cihan
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 46 (12) : E594 - E597
  • [3] 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Metastatic Papillary Renal Cell Cancer
    Civan, Caner
    Isik, Emine Goknur
    Karadogan, Seyfullah
    Sanli, Yasemin
    Kuyumcu, Serkan
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 48 (05) : E223 - E224
  • [4] Comparison of 68GA-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT findings in peritonitis carcinomatosa cases
    Guzel, Yunus
    Kaplan, Ihsan
    HELLENIC JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 26 (01) : 26 - 34
  • [5] Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in the staging and restaging of gastric adenocarcinoma
    Gundogan, Cihan
    Komek, Halil
    Can, Canan
    Yildirim, Ozgen Ahmet
    Kaplan, Ihsan
    Erdur, Erkan
    Poyraz, Kerem
    Guzel, Yunus
    Oruc, Zeynep
    Cakabay, Bahri
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 43 (01) : 64 - 72
  • [6] Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing ovarian cancer
    Liu, Yunuan
    Pan, Jiangyang
    Jing, Fenglian
    Chen, Xiaolin
    Zhao, Xinming
    Zhang, Jingmian
    Zhang, Zhaoqi
    Wang, Jianfang
    Dai, Meng
    Wang, Na
    Zhao, Xiujuan
    Han, Jingya
    Wang, Tingting
    Chen, Xiaoshan
    Yuan, Huiqing
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (12) : 4531 - 4542
  • [7] 68Ga-FAPI-04 Versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Wang, Hao
    Zhu, Wenwei
    Ren, Shuhua
    Kong, Yanyan
    Huang, Qi
    Zhao, Jun
    Guan, Yihui
    Jia, Huliang
    Chen, Jinhong
    Lu, Lu
    Xie, Fang
    Qin, Lunxiu
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [8] 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT Versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma
    Gundogan, Cihan
    Guzel, Yunus
    Komek, Halil
    Etem, Hulya
    Kaplan, Ihsan
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 47 (02) : E113 - E115
  • [9] 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/MR Versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Detection of Ovarian Cancer
    Sun, Gaofeng
    Zou, Ruoyao
    Yao, Liangqing
    Zuo, Changjing
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 48 (06) : 525 - 527
  • [10] Comparison of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT with 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosis and staging of gastric and colorectal cancer
    Wang, Bin
    Zhao, Xinming
    Liu, Yunuan
    Zhang, Zhaoqi
    Chen, Xiaoshan
    Jing, Fenglian
    Chen, Xiaolin
    Hua, Yu
    Zhao, Jianqiang
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 45 (07) : 612 - 621