Do They Have a Choice? Surrogate Decision-Making After Severe Acute Brain Injury*

被引:12
|
作者
Goss, Adeline L. [1 ]
Voumard, Rachel Rutz [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Engelberg, Ruth A. [5 ,6 ]
Curtis, J. Randall [5 ,6 ]
Creutzfeldt, Claire J. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Highland Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Neurol, Oakland, CA 94602 USA
[2] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Palliat & Support Care Serv, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Univ Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Inst Humanities Med, Clin Eth Unit, Lausanne, Switzerland
[5] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Cambia Palliat Care Ctr Excellence, Seattle, WA USA
[7] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Seattle, WA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
acute brain injuries; clinical decision-making; communication; neurology; prognosis; PALLIATIVE CARE; LIFE-SUPPORT; PROGNOSIS; SATURATION; AID;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0000000000005850
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives:In the early phase of severe acute brain injury (SABI), surrogate decision-makers must make treatment decisions in the face of prognostic uncertainty. Evidence-based strategies to communicate uncertainty and support decision-making are lacking. Our objective was to better understand surrogate experiences and needs during the period of active decision-making in SABI, to inform interventions to support SABI patients and families and improve clinician-surrogate communication. Design:We interviewed surrogate decision-makers during patients' acute hospitalization for SABI, as part of a larger (n = 222) prospective longitudinal cohort study of patients with SABI and their family members. Constructivist grounded theory informed data collection and analysis. Setting:One U.S. academic medical center. Patients:We iteratively collected and analyzed semistructured interviews with 22 surrogates for 19 patients. Interventions:None. Measurements and Main Results:Through several rounds of coding, interview notes, reflexive memos, and group discussion, we developed a thematic model describing the relationship between surrogate perspectives on decision-making and surrogate experiences of prognostic uncertainty. Patients ranged from 20 to 79 years of age (mean = 55 years) and had primary diagnoses of stroke (n = 13; 68%), traumatic brain injury (n = 5; 26%), and anoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest (n = 1; 5%). Patients were predominantly male (n = 12; 63%), whereas surrogates were predominantly female (n = 13; 68%). Two distinct perspectives on decision-making emerged: one group of surrogates felt a clear sense of agency around decision-making, whereas the other group reported a more passive role in decision-making, such that they did not even perceive there being a decision to make. Surrogates in both groups identified prognostic uncertainty as the central challenge in SABI, but they managed it differently. Only surrogates who felt they were actively deciding described time-limited trials as helpful. Conclusions:In this qualitative study, not all surrogate "decision-makers" viewed themselves as making decisions. Nearly all struggled with prognostic uncertainty. Our findings underline the need for longitudinal prognostic communication strategies in SABI targeted at surrogates' current perspectives on decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 935
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING IN SEVERE BRAIN INJURY
    TURKSTRA, LS
    ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1992, 49 (04) : 349 - 350
  • [2] The temporality of uncertainty in decision-making and treatment of severe brain injury
    Mathiasen, Mia Krogager
    Jorgensen, Lene Bastrup
    From, Mette
    Aadal, Lena
    Pallesen, Hanne
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [3] Women's Career Decision-Making After Brain Injury
    Iaquinta, Maria
    Amundson, Norman E.
    Borgen, William A.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CAREER DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 11 (01): : 38 - 48
  • [4] Decision-making regarding treatment limitation after severe traumatic brain injury: A survey of French neurosurgeons
    Boyer, F.
    Audibert, G.
    Baumann, C.
    Colnat-Coulbois, S.
    Pinelli, C.
    Claudot, F.
    Baumann, A.
    NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2018, 64 (06) : 401 - 409
  • [5] Clinician perspectives on decision-making capacity after acquired brain injury
    Mukherjee, Debjani
    McDonough, Carol
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2006, 13 (03) : 75 - 83
  • [6] Decision-making after traumatic brain injury in children: A preliminary study
    Hanten, Gerri
    Scheibel, Randall S.
    Li, Xiaoqi
    Oomer, Imran
    Stallings-Robertson, Garland
    Hunter, Jill V.
    Levin, Harvey S.
    NEUROCASE, 2006, 12 (04) : 247 - 251
  • [7] ASSESSING DECISION-MAKING CAPACITY AFTER BRAIN INJURY: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL APPROACH
    Owen, Gareth S.
    Freyenhagen, Fabian
    Martin, Wayne
    PHILOSOPHY PSYCHIATRY & PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 25 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [8] "What choice do we have?" Reactive and proactive decision-making for aging in place with dementia
    Auriemma, Catherine L.
    Butt, Maayra I.
    Mcmillan, Julia
    Silvestri, Jasmine A.
    Chow, Carolyn
    Bahti, Melanie
    Klaiman, Tamar
    Harkins, Kristin
    Karlawish, Jason
    Halpern, Scott D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2024,
  • [9] AIDS AND SURROGATE DECISION-MAKING
    HANSELL, DA
    MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 58 (05): : 375 - 378
  • [10] A surrogate for decision-making in the ICU
    Burchardi, H
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 27 (08) : 1243 - 1244