Techno-economic and life cycle assessments for bioenergy recovery from acid-hydrolyzed residues of sugarcane bagasse in the biobased xylose production platform

被引:12
|
作者
Pan, Shiyou [1 ,2 ]
Zabed, Hossain M. [1 ]
Zhao, Mei [1 ]
Qi, Xianghui [1 ]
Wei, Yutuo [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Food & Biol Engn, 301 Xuefu Rd, Zhenjiang 212013, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Univ, Coll Life Sci & Technol, Guangxi Microorganism & Enzyme Res Ctr Engn Techno, State Key Lab Conservat & Utilizat Subtrop Agrobio, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lignocellulose; Biorefinery; Waste management; Energy valorization; TEA-LCA; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION; ECONOMIC-ASSESSMENT; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; WHEAT-STRAW; JET FUEL; ETHANOL; PURIFICATION; BIOREFINERY; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136718
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The acid-hydrolyzed residues of lignocellulosic biomass are the primary organic solid wastes during xylose production, while their management and/or valorization have often been overlooked. Here, based on the xylose production platform, four scenarios were established for techno-economic and life cycle assessments (TEA-LCA) of sugarcane bagasse-derived hydrolysis residue obtained from H2SO4 pretreatment, including landfill (baseline), incineration with cogeneration system, bioethanol production, and biomethane production. According to the TEA results, the landfill scenario exhibited the lowest economic benefits, with an internal rate of return (IRR) 18.8% and a net present value (NPV) of 23,270,090 $. In contrast, the incineration scenario showed the best economic results, with IRR and NPV improving by 4.7% and 68.8%, respectively. The bioethanol and bio-methane scenarios exhibited an IRR of 0.2% and 2.2% higher than the IRR of the landfill, respectively. Furthermore, the economics of all four scenarios were sensitive to plant capacity, hemicellulose to xylose con-version rate, and xylose price. The LCA showed that landfill was the worst option, followed by bioethanol and incineration, while the biomethane scenario reduced 39.3% of the adverse impacts using the ReCiPe single score, as it avoided a higher amount of production of synthetic fertilizer and natural gas. The environmental perfor-mance was sensitive to the conversion rate of hemicellulose to xylose as per the sensitivity analysis. This study indicated that the valorization of acid-hydrolyzed residues into bioenergy was attractive for the xylose plant, and give the decision-makers a clear perspective for developing a sustainable disposal policy for acid-hydrolyzed residues.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sugarcane bagasse valorization to xylitol: Techno-economic and life cycle assessment
    Shaji, Arun
    Shastri, Yogendra
    Kumar, Vinod
    Ranade, Vivek V.
    Hindle, Neil
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2022, 16 (05): : 1214 - 1226
  • [2] Bioenergy production from sugarcane bagasse with carbon capture and storage: Surrogate models for techno-economic decisions
    Wiesberg, Igor Lapenda
    de Medeiros, José Luiz
    Paes de Mello, Raphael V.
    Santos Maia, Jeiveison G.S.
    Bastos, João Bruno V.
    Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F.
    [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 150
  • [3] Bioenergy production from sugarcane bagasse with carbon capture and storage: Surrogate models for techno-economic decisions
    Wiesberg, Igor Lapenda
    de Medeiros, Jose Luiz
    Paes de Mello, Raphael, V
    Santos Maia, Jeiveison G. S.
    Bastos, Joao Bruno, V
    Araujo, Ofelia de Queiroz F.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 150
  • [4] Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of sustainable bioenergy production: a review
    Osman, Ahmed I.
    Fang, Bingbing
    Zhang, Yubing
    Liu, Yunfei
    Yu, Jiacheng
    Farghali, Mohamed
    Rashwan, Ahmed K.
    Chen, Zhonghao
    Chen, Lin
    Ihara, Ikko
    Rooney, David W.
    Yap, Pow-Seng
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2024, 22 (03) : 1115 - 1154
  • [5] Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of sustainable bioenergy production: a review
    Ahmed I. Osman
    Bingbing Fang
    Yubing Zhang
    Yunfei Liu
    Jiacheng Yu
    Mohamed Farghali
    Ahmed K. Rashwan
    Zhonghao Chen
    Lin Chen
    Ikko Ihara
    David W. Rooney
    Pow-Seng Yap
    [J]. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2024, 22 : 1115 - 1154
  • [6] Biobased propylene and acrylonitrile production in a sugarcane biorefinery: Identification of preferred production routes via techno-economic and environmental assessments
    Rode, Lukhanyo
    Bosman, Catharine Elizabeth
    Louw, Jeanne
    Petersen, Abdul
    Nosrati Ghods, Nosaibeh
    Görgens, Johann Ferdinand
    [J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2024, 190
  • [7] Ethylene production: process design, techno-economic and life-cycle assessments
    Chen, Yuqiu
    Kuo, Mi Jen
    Lobo, Raul
    Ierapetritou, Marianthi
    [J]. GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2024, 26 (05) : 2903 - 2911
  • [8] Techno-Economic Analysis of 2,3-Butanediol Production from Sugarcane Bagasse
    Gadkari, Siddharth
    Narisetty, Vivek
    Maity, Sunil K.
    Manyar, Haresh
    Mohanty, Kaustubha
    Jeyakumar, Rajesh Banu
    Pant, Kamal Kishore
    Kumar, Vinod
    [J]. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2023, 11 (22): : 8337 - 8349
  • [9] Techno-Economic Analysis of 2,3-Butanediol Production from Sugarcane Bagasse
    Gadkari, Siddharth
    Narisetty, Vivek
    Maity, Sunil K.
    Manyar, Haresh
    Mohanty, Kaustubha
    Jeyakumar, Rajesh Banu
    Pant, Kamal Kishore
    Kumar, Vinod
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (22) : 8337 - 8349
  • [10] Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessments for Sustainable Rare Earth Recovery from Coal Byproducts using Biosorption
    Alipanah, Majid
    Park, Dan M.
    Middleton, Andrew
    Dong, Ziye
    Hsu-Kim, Heileen
    Jiao, Yongqin
    Jin, Hongyue
    [J]. ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2020, 8 (49) : 17914 - 17922