Blockchain Transaction Fee Forecasting: A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods

被引:1
|
作者
Butler, Conall [1 ]
Crane, Martin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dublin City Univ, Sch Comp, Dublin D09 PX21, Ireland
[2] Dublin City Univ, ADAPT Res Ctr, Dublin D09 PX21, Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Ethereum; gas; LSTM; CNN-LSTM; Direct-Recursive Hybrid; attention; wavelet denoising; wavelet coherence; matrix profile;
D O I
10.3390/math11092212
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Gas is the transaction-fee metering system of the Ethereum network. Users of the network are required to select a gas price for submission with their transaction, creating a risk of overpaying or delayed/unprocessed transactions involved in this selection. In this work, we investigate data in the aftermath of the London Hard Fork and shed insight into the transaction dynamics of the network after this major fork. As such, this paper provides an update on work previous to 2019 on the link between EthUSD/BitUSD and gas price. For forecasting, we compare a novel combination of machine learning methods such as Direct-Recursive Hybrid LSTM, CNN-LSTM, and Attention-LSTM. These are combined with wavelet threshold denoising and matrix profile data processing toward the forecasting of block minimum gas price, on a 5-min timescale, over multiple lookaheads. As the first application of the matrix profile being applied to gas price data and forecasting that we are aware of, this study demonstrates that matrix profile data can enhance attention-based models; however, given the hardware constraints, hybrid models outperformed attention and CNN-LSTM models. The wavelet coherence of inputs demonstrates correlation in multiple variables on a 1-day timescale, which is a deviation of base free from gas price. A Direct-Recursive Hybrid LSTM strategy is found to outperform other models, with an average RMSE of 26.08 and R-2 of 0.54 over a 50-min lookahead window compared to an RMSE of 26.78 and R-2 of 0.452 in the best-performing attention model. Hybrid models are shown to have favorable performance up to a 20-min lookahead with performance being comparable to attention models when forecasting 25-50-min ahead. Forecasts over a range of lookaheads allow users to make an informed decision on gas price selection and the optimal window to submit their transaction in without fear of their transaction being rejected. This, in turn, gives more detailed insight into gas price dynamics than existing recommenders, oracles and forecasting approaches, which provide simple heuristics or limited lookahead horizons.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Blockchain transaction fee and Ethereum Merge
    Jain, Archana
    Jain, Chinmay
    Krystyniak, Karolina
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 58
  • [2] Transaction fee economics in the Ethereum blockchain
    Donmez, Anil
    Karaivanov, Alexander
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2022, 60 (01) : 265 - 292
  • [3] Bitcoin daily price prediction through understanding blockchain transaction pattern with machine learning methods
    Xiao Li
    Linda Du
    [J]. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 2023, 45
  • [4] Bitcoin daily price prediction through understanding blockchain transaction pattern with machine learning methods
    Li, Xiao
    Du, Linda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION, 2023, 45 (01)
  • [5] Comparison of Machine Learning Based Methods for Residential Load Forecasting
    Shabbir, Noman
    Ahmadiahangar, Roya
    Kutt, Lauri
    Rosin, Argo
    [J]. 2019 ELECTRIC POWER QUALITY AND SUPPLY RELIABILITY CONFERENCE (PQ) & 2019 SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND MECHATRONICS (SEEM), 2019,
  • [6] Comparison of statistical and machine learning methods for daily SKU demand forecasting
    Evangelos Spiliotis
    Spyros Makridakis
    Artemios-Anargyros Semenoglou
    Vassilios Assimakopoulos
    [J]. Operational Research, 2022, 22 : 3037 - 3061
  • [7] A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Forecasting Dow Jones Stock Index
    Alihodzic, Adis
    Zvornicanin, Enes
    Cunjalo, Fikret
    [J]. LARGE-SCALE SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING (LSSC 2021), 2022, 13127 : 209 - 216
  • [8] Comparison of statistical and machine learning methods for daily SKU demand forecasting
    Spiliotis, Evangelos
    Makridakis, Spyros
    Semenoglou, Artemios-Anargyros
    Assimakopoulos, Vassilios
    [J]. OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (03) : 3037 - 3061
  • [9] Electricity market transaction model design combining blockchain and machine learning
    Liu, YunXiang
    Zhou, Feng
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING (ICCECE), 2021, : 458 - 464
  • [10] Research on Blockchain Transaction Privacy Protection Methods Based on Deep Learning
    Li, Jun
    Zhang, Chenyang
    Zhang, Jianyi
    Shao, Yanhua
    [J]. FUTURE INTERNET, 2024, 16 (04)