Director turnover, board monitoring and audit fees: Some Australian evidence

被引:1
|
作者
Kanapathippillai, Sutharson [1 ]
Yaftian, Ali [1 ]
Mirshekary, Soheila [2 ]
Sami, Heibatollah [3 ]
Gul, Ferdinand A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Fac Bus & Law, Deakin Business Sch, 70 Elgar Rd, Burwood, Vic 3125, Australia
[2] Texila Coll, 440 Elizabeth St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[3] Lehigh Univ, Dept Accounting, Accounting, 820 Loraine St,A Rdmore, Bethlehem, PA 19003 USA
[4] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sch Business & Creat Ind, 72 Nyes Crescent, Buderim, Qld 4556, Australia
关键词
Director turnover; Audit fees; Internal controls; Board monitoring; Business risk; Audit risks; CEO TURNOVER; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; LITIGATION RISK; UPPER ECHELONS; INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION; BUSINESS RISK; IMPACT; MANAGEMENT; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102246
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper explores the association between director turnover and increased audit fees in Australia. The study, aligned with upper echelon theory, reveals that the characteristics and actions of top management, as reflected in director turnover, impact corporate decisions and risktaking behavior. Specifically, higher director turnover is linked to elevated audit fees, disrupting the stability of top management's monitoring and advisory functions. The association is more pronounced for external turnover compared to internal turnover. Additionally, firms with robust corporate governance quality exhibit a weakened positive relationship between director turnover and audit fees. Notably, the COVID-19 pandemic further amplifies the director turnover/audit fees connection. The findings suggest that auditors are likely to consider and price in the impact of board instability on internal controls and monitoring/advisory functions.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimistic tone and audit fees: Some Australian evidence
    de Castro, Vincent Bicudo
    Gul, Ferdinand A.
    Muttakin, Mohammad Badrul
    Mihret, Dessalegn Getie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDITING, 2019, 23 (02) : 352 - 364
  • [2] Corporate political donations and audit fees: Some evidence from Australian audit pricing
    Gul, Ferdinand A.
    Khan, Arifur
    Lai, Karen
    Mihret, Dessalegn Getie
    Muttakin, Mohammad Badrul
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDITING, 2024, 28 (02) : 340 - 363
  • [3] Abnormal audit fees and audit quality: Australian evidence
    Hossain, Sarowar
    Wang, Jenny Jing
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2023, 48 (03) : 596 - 624
  • [4] Board Structure and Audit Committee Monitoring: Effects of Audit Committee Monitoring Incentives and Board Entrenchment on Audit Fees
    Karim, Khondkar
    Robin, Ashok
    Suh, SangHyun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND FINANCE, 2016, 31 (02): : 249 - 276
  • [5] Board reforms and audit fees: international evidence
    Huang, Yuan
    Li, Xiao
    Song, Zilong
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2022, 29 (05) : 1227 - 1246
  • [6] The impact of board reforms on audit fees: International evidence
    Kim, Incheol
    Kong, Joon Ho
    Yang, Rong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2024, 51 (1-2) : 45 - 83
  • [7] Managerial ownership, audit firm size, and audit fees: Australian evidence
    Shan, Yuan George
    Troshani, Indrit
    Tarca, Ann
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND TAXATION, 2019, 35 : 18 - 36
  • [8] Audit fees, board ethnicity and board independence: evidence from South Africa
    Muniandy, Balachandran
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2022, 37 (04) : 409 - 437
  • [9] Board characteristics and audit fees
    Carcello, JV
    Hermanson, DR
    Neal, TL
    Riley, RA
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2002, 19 (03) : 365 - 384
  • [10] Former CEO Director and Audit Fees
    Cai, Yongbin
    Li, Mengzhe
    Guo, Siyuan
    Nan, Xingheng
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2023, 59 (04) : 1074 - 1088