Comparison of Machine Learning Model Performance based on Observation Methods using Naked-eye and Visibility-meter

被引:0
|
作者
Park, Changhyoun [1 ]
Lee, Soon-Hwan [2 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Inst Environm Studies, Busan 46241, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Earth Sci Educ, Busan 46241, South Korea
来源
关键词
XGBoost; fog prediction; visibility; machine learning; weather phenomenon number; WINTER FOG; POLYNOMIALS; REGION;
D O I
10.5467/JKESS.2023.44.2.105
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In this study, we predicted the presence of fog with a one-hour delay using the XGBoost DART machine learning algorithm for Andong, which had the highest occurrence of fog among inland stations from 2016 to 2020. We used six datasets: meteorological data, agricultural observation data, additional derived data, and their expanded data. The weather phenomenon numbers obtained through naked-eye observations and the visibility distances measured by visibility meters were classified as fog [1] or no-fog [0]. We set up twelve machine learning modeling experiments and used data from 2021 for model validation. We mainly evaluated model performance using recall and AUC-ROC, considering the harmful effects of fog on society and local communities. The combination of oversampled meteorological data features and the target induced by weather phenomenon numbers showed the best performance. This result highlights the importance of naked-eye observations in predicting fog using machine learning algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 118
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Monitoring the level of Light Pollution and its Impact on Astronomical Bodies Naked-Eye Visibility Range in Selected Areas in Malaysia using the Sky Quality Meter
    Faid, M. S.
    Husien, Nurulhazwani
    Shariff, N. N. M.
    Ali, M. O.
    Hamidi, Z. S.
    Zainol, N. H.
    Sabri, S. N. U.
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS (ICIMSA), 2016,
  • [2] Classification of Depression Using Machine Learning Methods Based on Eye Movement Variance Entropy
    Jiang, Zhongyi
    Zhou, Ying
    Zhang, Yihan
    Dong, Guanzhong
    Chen, Yun
    Zhang, Qiaoyang
    Zou, Ling
    Cao, Yin
    [J]. IEEE Access, 2024, 12 : 146107 - 146120
  • [3] Visibility Prediction based on kilometric NWP Model Outputs using Machine-learning Regression
    Bari, Driss
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-SCIENCE (E-SCIENCE 2018), 2018, : 278 - 282
  • [4] Naked-Eye 3D Display Based on Microlens Array Using Combined Micro-Nano Imprint and UV Offset Printing Methods
    Chen, Linyi
    Chen, Guangxue
    Liao, Liyu
    Chen, Haozhi
    [J]. MOLECULES, 2020, 25 (09):
  • [5] Performance analysis and comparison of Machine Learning and LoRa-based Healthcare model
    Verma, Navneet
    Singh, Sukhdip
    Prasad, Devendra
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2023, 35 (17): : 12751 - 12761
  • [6] Performance analysis and comparison of Machine Learning and LoRa-based Healthcare model
    Navneet Verma
    Sukhdip Singh
    Devendra Prasad
    [J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2023, 35 : 12751 - 12761
  • [7] Development of a Probabilistic Seismic Performance Assessment Model of Slope Using Machine Learning Methods
    Kwag, Shinyoung
    Hahm, Daegi
    Kim, Minkyu
    Eem, Seunghyun
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (08)
  • [8] Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Annual Precipitation Prediction Using Different Decomposition Methods
    Song, Chao
    Chen, Xiaohong
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 27
  • [9] Performance comparison of deep learning and machine learning methods in determining wetland water areas using EuroSAT dataset
    Gunen, Mehmet Akif
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (14) : 21092 - 21106
  • [10] Performance comparison of deep learning and machine learning methods in determining wetland water areas using EuroSAT dataset
    Mehmet Akif Günen
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 21092 - 21106