Socially responsible supply chain initiatives and their outcomes: a taxonomy of manufacturing companies

被引:9
|
作者
Picasso, Fernando Goncalves [1 ]
Biazzin, Cristiane [2 ]
Paiva, Ely Laureano [1 ]
Partyka, Raul Beal [1 ]
机构
[1] Fundacao Getulio Vargass Sao Paulo Sch Business A, Dept Operat Management, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Northern Kentucky Univ, Haile Coll Business, Highland Hts, KY USA
关键词
Corporate responsibility; Empirical study; Cluster analysis; Supply chain ethics; Supplier-manufacturer relationships; SCM performance; MODERN SLAVERY; INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; CSR; MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPACT; PROCUREMENT; COMMITMENT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1108/SCM-11-2020-0578
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to propose a taxonomy based on socially responsible practices across supply chains. The authors compare and contrast different socially responsible initiatives in manufacturing supply chains and their effect on economic performance, socially responsible outcomes and manufacturing costs. Design/methodology/approach This study is based on survey data collected in 262 manufacturing plants located in 15 countries. Cluster analysis is conducted to develop the research taxonomy. Moreover, socially responsible initiatives were compared on a country level. Finally, multiple regressions were performed to identify associations between performance, manufacturing and socially responsible variables. Findings The taxonomy was constructed based on four socially responsible corporate dimensions (legal, ethical, discretionary and economic). The results identified three clusters of manufacturing organizations that adopt different approaches to socially responsible initiatives across supply chains and their performance. Originality/value Previous studies explored the elements and the impacts of the go-no-go decisions in the intersection between CSR and the supply chain. The present study brings new insights by analyzing how socially responsible initiatives in supply chains and their performance are different. Moreover, the sample encompasses 15 countries, and it proposes a taxonomy and directions to support the managers' decision-making process.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 106
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Supply Chain Solutions for Manufacturing Companies
    Rahman, M. N. Ab.
    Wasilan, H.
    Ismail, A. R.
    Ghani, J. A.
    Deros, B. Md
    [J]. AEBD '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORLD MULTICONFERENCE ON APPLIED ECONOMICS, BUSINESS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2009, : 29 - 34
  • [2] UPDATE ON SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE COMPANIES
    OJALA, M
    [J]. DATABASE-THE MAGAZINE OF ELECTRONIC DATABASE REVIEWS, 1995, 18 (03): : 6 - 6
  • [3] FINDING SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE COMPANIES
    OJALA, M
    [J]. DATABASE, 1994, 17 (05): : 86 - 89
  • [4] Investing in Socially Responsible Companies
    Goldberg, Jennifer
    Goldberg, Stephen R.
    Ratliff-Miller, Paulette
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2008, 20 (01): : 53 - 58
  • [5] Achieving a socially responsible supply chain through assessment and collaboration
    Sancha, Cristina
    Gimenez, Cristina
    Sierra, Vicenta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 : 1934 - 1947
  • [6] Coordination of a Socially Responsible Supply Chain with Cause Marketing Campaigns
    Xin Li
    Minghui Xu
    Xintong Shi
    [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2021, 30 : 728 - 747
  • [7] Coordination of a Socially Responsible Supply Chain with Cause Marketing Campaigns
    Li, Xin
    Xu, Minghui
    Shi, Xintong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2021, 30 (06) : 728 - 747
  • [8] Optimal Policies in a Green Supply Chain with Socially Responsible Manufacturer
    Sang, Shengju
    [J]. ENGINEERING LETTERS, 2019, 27 (04) : 696 - 707
  • [9] Stakeholder Forces of Socially Responsible Supply Chain Management Orientation
    Park-Poaps, Haesun
    Rees, Kathleen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 92 (02) : 305 - 322
  • [10] Stakeholder Forces of Socially Responsible Supply Chain Management Orientation
    Haesun Park-Poaps
    Kathleen Rees
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 92 : 305 - 322