Developing a Framework for Self-regulatory Governance in Healthcare AI Research: Insights from South Korea

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Junhewk [1 ]
Kim, So Yoon [2 ]
Kim, Eun-Ae [3 ]
Sim, Jin-Ah [4 ]
Lee, Yuri [5 ]
Kim, Hannah [2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Dent Educ, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Asian Inst Bioeth & Hlth Law, Dept Med Humanities & Social Sci, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Ewha Womans Univ, Ctr Res Compliance, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Hallym Univ, Dept AI Convergence, Chunchon, South Korea
[5] Myongji Coll, Dept Hlth & Med Informat, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Healthcare AI research; Research ethics; Research governance; AI governance; Self-regulation; Interdisciplinary approach;
D O I
10.1007/s41649-024-00281-w
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper elucidates and rationalizes the ethical governance system for healthcare AI research, as outlined in the 'Research Ethics Guidelines for AI Researchers in Healthcare' published by the South Korean government in August 2023. In developing the guidelines, a four-phase clinical trial process was expanded to six stages for healthcare AI research: preliminary ethics review (stage 1); creating datasets (stage 2); model development (stage 3); training, validation, and evaluation (stage 4); application (stage 5); and post-deployment monitoring (stage 6). Researchers identified similarities between clinical trials and healthcare AI research, particularly in research subjects, management and regulations, and application of research results. In the step-by-step articulation of ethical requirements, this similarity benefits from a reliable and flexible use of existing research ethics governance resources, research management, and regulatory functions. In contrast to clinical trials, this procedural approach to healthcare AI research governance effectively highlights the distinct characteristics of healthcare AI research in research and development process, evaluation of results, and modifiability of findings. The model exhibits limitations, primarily in its reliance on self-regulation and lack of clear delineation of responsibilities. While formulated through multidisciplinary deliberations, its application in the research field remains untested. To overcome the limitations, the researchers' ongoing efforts for educating AI researchers and public and the revision of the guidelines are expected to contribute to establish an ethical research governance framework for healthcare AI research in the South Korean context in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 406
页数:16
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Urgent Need for Developing a Framework for the Governance of AI in Healthcare
    Baig, Mansoor Ali
    Almuhaizea, Mohamad A.
    Alshehri, Jumanah
    Bazarbashi, Mohammad Shouki
    Al-Shagathrh, Fahad
    [J]. IMPORTANCE OF HEALTH INFORMATICS IN PUBLIC HEALTH DURING A PANDEMIC, 2020, 272 : 253 - 256
  • [2] Developing policy theories in South Korea: lessons from the advocacy coalition framework
    Park, Kyudong
    Weible, Christopher M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2018, 11 (02) : 136 - 150
  • [3] Self-regulatory ability, fatigue, and the experience of pain: Mechanistic insights from pain-free undergraduates
    Boggero, Ian A.
    Segerstrom, Suzanne C.
    [J]. PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 56 (09)
  • [4] The role of healthcare providers in expanding legal abortion: Qualitative insights from Argentina, Ireland, and South Korea
    van Keizerswaard, Lisa Juanola
    de Vries, Irene
    Moran, Nicole
    Poorter, Saskia
    Kok, Maryse
    Zamberlin, Nina
    Kim, Sunhye
    Favier, Mary
    Chavkin, Wendy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 164 : 21 - 30
  • [5] Developing a sustainability implementation framework: insights from academic research on tools, initiatives and approaches
    Bautista-Puig, Nuria
    Lozano, Rodrigo
    Barreiro-Gen, Maria
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (10) : 11011 - 11031
  • [6] Developing a sustainability implementation framework: insights from academic research on tools, initiatives and approaches
    Núria Bautista-Puig
    Rodrigo Lozano
    Maria Barreiro-Gen
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25 : 11011 - 11031
  • [7] The Development of Epistemic Vigilance and Epistemic Trust Across the Lifespan: Perspectives from Empirical Research on Self-Regulatory Social Learning
    Talia, Alessandro
    Kling, Laura
    Taubner, Svenja
    [J]. PRAXIS DER KINDERPSYCHOLOGIE UND KINDERPSYCHIATRIE, 2024, 73 (04) : 362 - 379
  • [8] Modeling Conceptual Framework for Implementing Barriers of AI in Public Healthcare for Improving Operational Excellence: Experiences from Developing Countries
    Joshi, Sudhanshu
    Sharma, Manu
    Das, Rashmi Prava
    Rosak-Szyrocka, Joanna
    Zywiolek, Justyna
    Muduli, Kamalakanta
    Prasad, Mukesh
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [9] Local Self-Governance in Antiquity and in the Global South. Theoretical and Empirical Insights from an Interdisciplinary Perspective
    Slootjes, Danielle
    [J]. CLASSICAL REVIEW, 2024,
  • [10] A critical juncture in universal healthcare: insights from South Korea’s COVID-19 experience for the United Kingdom to consider
    Kyungmoo Heo
    Keonyeong Jeong
    Daejoong Lee
    Yongseok Seo
    [J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8